Mafiascum.net

In post 72, Vorkuta wrote:In post #6? When it generated such useful discussion and a potential read on a player?
Do better

You haven’t provided useful discussion though. You’ve also made it impossible for me to accurately read at least one player.

I’d say if you are town you’ve done more harm than good. It’s awesome if you gained something but if you’re town you’ve alienated one of your teammates. Somebody who you may need as an ally at some point.

I’ve wasted enough breath on vork. Imma sit back and monitor things for a while. If anyone else has questions I’m around.

In post 74, Wimpy wrote:What I said was fact. What you said is an insult.

False.
What you said was "wrong" hence not a fact: I have thought out my self-vote and my decision-making processes are functioning quite well thank you very much.
What I said was a fact: you are stubborn in your preconceived notions of how mafia should be played and this is the behavior of a VI.

In post 75, Wimpy wrote:You haven’t provided useful discussion though.

*looks at this exchange*
mmk

Vork's 100% nonbiased and accurate readlist volume #1

{papa-mason, profi}
{wimpy}
{plank, elly}
{wake}

People who need to post more and I'm going to bug in a bit
{salad, Zote, Looker, almidia}

Vork's 100% nonbiased and accurate readlist volume #1

{papa-mason, profi}
{wimpy}
{plank, elly}
{wake}

People who need to post more and I'm going to bug in a bit
{salad, Zote, Looker, almidia}

Oops *blames website*
For posterity- wake's scumread is NOT because of his shitty opening (maybe 10%)

BUT because of the following hypocrisy/doublestandard of invoking the gamerule.
>when vork self votes, then it's against wincon
>but when wake lol!quickhammers ASAP, then it's ok and totally according to his wincon.

In post 78, Vorkuta wrote:False.
What you said was "wrong" hence not a fact:

actually there is a game rule that supports what I said IS a fact.

In post 78, Vorkuta wrote:*looks at this exchange*
mmk

This exchange has produced nothing useful at all. The only thing it has done is annoyed me even more than I already am and I still don't know if you are town or scum.

why do people think quick hammers are bad? Like why is wake getting shit for that statement?

yo wimpy, why you so angsty? Take a chill pill my dude.
VOTE: Elements
It's not counter win condition to vote yourself at this stage. There are no wagons, there's no possibility to be lynched from it. It generated discussion which is pro town. I think you should

In post 84, Elements wrote:yo wimpy, why you so angsty? Take a chill pill my dude.
VOTE: Elements
It's not counter win condition to vote yourself at this stage. There are no wagons, there's no possibility to be lynched from it. It generated discussion which is pro town. I think you should vote yourself. It's very liberating.

EBWOP

In post 77, Elements wrote:VOTE: wimpy

This is agood vote

In post 79, Vorkuta wrote:Vork's 100% nonbiased and accurate readlist volume #1

{papa-mason, profi}
{wimpy}
{plank, elly}
{wake}

People who need to post more and I'm going to bug in a bit
{salad, Zote, Looker, almidia}

This is a good read list

In post 86, Saudade wrote:

In post 77, Elements wrote:VOTE: wimpy

This is agood vote

<3

In post 82, Wimpy wrote:actually there is a game rule that supports what I said IS a fact.

zzzz

In post 1, Montosh wrote:Don’t work against your win condition.

Does not apply here.


Wait
You guys aren't actually under the delusion that I intend to keep my vote parked on myself the entire day right?
It's a stupid question, but it needs to be asked in this case.

In post 83, Wimpy wrote:why do people think quick hammers are bad? Like why is wake getting

shit

for that statement?

-hyposcum!wake hammering hyposcum!partner = ACTUAL rule violation, and not a pretend one
-any!wake hammering someone before they have a chance to claim = shit
-any!wake hammering someone before they share their final reads/make their final read/shows their final hand = shit
-any!wake hammering someone to end the day prematurely just for the sake of it = shit

He deserves said shit for that statement.

In post 83, Wimpy wrote:why do people think quick hammers are bad? Like why is wake getting shit for that statement?

Hmmmmmmmmm how many games have you played so far

I like vorkuta the most this game so far

In post 84, Elements wrote:yo wimpy, why you so angsty? Take a chill pill my dude.
VOTE: Elements
It's not counter win condition to vote yourself at this stage. There are no wagons, there's no possibility to be lynched from it. It generated discussion which is pro town. I think you should

I am angsty by nature. anxiety sucks ass

We can agree to disagree about the win con stuff.

I like profi too tbh

Elements is alright'ish...

In post 85, Elements wrote:I think you should vote yourself. It's very liberating.

Plus my mason buddy who i townread......

I think we are going to lynch both scum back to back boys

In post 92, Wimpy wrote:We can agree to disagree about the win con stuff.

I accept your concession

In post 90, Saudade wrote:

In post 83, Wimpy wrote:why do people think quick hammers are bad? Like why is wake getting shit for that statement?

Hmmmmmmmmm how many games have you played so far

too many to count