Page 4 of 51
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:39 pm
by Invisibility
In post 74, Jake The Wolfie wrote: In post 72, Invisibility wrote:
haha oh yeah I'm big bad omgus man
also because its like... im at least trying to forward the game forward in the forward direction like
you hadn't done anything
and really why would me being a hypocrite in this situation make me scum
"Jake is scum because they haven't posted. Jake is scum for calling me out on my crap."
oh yeah I'm scum for criticizing you ever
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:39 pm
by Invisibility
also I wasn't even calling you scum when I first voted you
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:42 pm
by Jake The Wolfie
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:45 pm
by Invisibility
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:48 pm
by Invisibility
wait so what are you arguing right now
what's your current point
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 1:51 pm
by Jake The Wolfie
You are saying that I haven't been posting in your
first
post.
Who are your strongest reads and why?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:01 pm
by Invisibility
In post 80, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
You are saying that I haven't been posting in your
first
post.
Who are your strongest reads and why?
and that makes me scum why?
kcda has been pretty productive this game. so has ethos with comparison to everyone else.
Sausasaurus because I read earnestness in his posts
also I think that you're probably scum, because it feels like I poked a nerve that would be poked that a townie likely wouldn't have and your responses to my posts directed at you haven't been all that great either.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:03 pm
by Invisibility
my scumread is basically me blowing on you and you acting like I shot you
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:09 pm
by alimdia
In post 63, Kcdaspot wrote:Pahahaha. No. We not lynching invis
He has 7 posts to your 2. And you're calling him out
Hahahhahahahaha
??? What's your problem mate. Number of posts doesn't matter in the context of what I said. I've had games where people fluff post a shitload but do absolutely jack all. For example, you have quite a lot of posts but a lot of them are fluff at the moment.
Invisibility voted for jake, saying 'post', when Lil Uzi Vert also hasn't posted. Opportunistic because he could have also voted Lil Uzi Vert to get them to post.
The 'Wagon' part was a bit of a joke, since there was only 2 votes I believe?
See above explanation.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:11 pm
by Invisibility
In post 83, alimdia wrote: In post 63, Kcdaspot wrote:Pahahaha. No. We not lynching invis
He has 7 posts to your 2. And you're calling him out
Hahahhahahahaha
??? What's your problem mate. Number of posts doesn't matter in the context of what I said. I've had games where people fluff post a shitload but do absolutely jack all. For example, you have quite a lot of posts but a lot of them are fluff at the moment.
Invisibility voted for jake, saying 'post', when Lil Uzi Vert also hasn't posted. Opportunistic because he could have also voted Lil Uzi Vert to get them to post.
The 'Wagon' part was a bit of a joke, since there was only 2 votes I believe?
See above explanation.
you saying my vote on Jake's wagon was opportunistic or me jumping on Jake and Uzi's wagons was opportunistic?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:25 pm
by alimdia
I'm saying you voting Jake was opportunistic because you could have voted Lil Uzi Vert for the same reason.
So either you didn't see that Lil also didn't post or you wanted to put another vote on Jake.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:29 pm
by Invisibility
In post 85, alimdia wrote:I'm saying you voting Jake was opportunistic because you could have voted Lil Uzi Vert for the same reason.
So either you didn't see that Lil also didn't post or you wanted to put another vote on Jake.
I voted someone with a vote already on them because that applies more pressure to that specific person? why is that a bad thing?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:31 pm
by Jake The Wolfie
oh no im dying help
Invisibility wrote: In post 80, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
You are saying that I haven't been posting in your
first
post.
Who are your strongest reads and why?
and that makes me scum why?
kcda has been pretty productive this game. so has ethos with comparison to everyone else.
Sausasaurus because I read earnestness in his posts
also I think that you're probably scum, because it feels like I poked a nerve that would be poked that a townie likely wouldn't have and your responses to my posts directed at you haven't been all that great either.
Or perhaps you're the scum here trying to entice me to look scummy, thus setting up a lynch.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:32 pm
by Invisibility
In post 87, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
oh no im dying help
Invisibility wrote: In post 80, Jake The Wolfie wrote:
You are saying that I haven't been posting in your
first
post.
Who are your strongest reads and why?
and that makes me scum why?
kcda has been pretty productive this game. so has ethos with comparison to everyone else.
Sausasaurus because I read earnestness in his posts
also I think that you're probably scum, because it feels like I poked a nerve that would be poked that a townie likely wouldn't have and your responses to my posts directed at you haven't been all that great either.
Or perhaps you're the scum here trying to entice me to look scummy, thus setting up a lynch.
um what
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:32 pm
by Invisibility
what the crap
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:33 pm
by Invisibility
what the actual crap are you saying that i voted you to get you to flail to make you into lynchbait what????
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:34 pm
by Jake The Wolfie
In post 90, Invisibility wrote:what the actual crap are you saying that i voted you to get you to flail to make you into lynchbait what????
I mean, is that not your plan?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:35 pm
by Invisibility
vote jake
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:41 pm
by Jake The Wolfie
And now you're just quicklynching. Why would you want a quicklynch?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:43 pm
by alimdia
In post 86, Invisibility wrote: In post 85, alimdia wrote:I'm saying you voting Jake was opportunistic because you could have voted Lil Uzi Vert for the same reason.
So either you didn't see that Lil also didn't post or you wanted to put another vote on Jake.
I voted someone with a vote already on them because that applies more pressure to that specific person? why is that a bad thing?
It was just a contradiction since someone else did the same thing.
This isn't going anywhere
This one the other hand......
This is looks like hard misrepping wtf?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:45 pm
by Invisibility
how is this quicklynching?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:45 pm
by eth0s
Yes I would like to ride this wagon
VOTE: jake
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:50 pm
by alimdia
Sorry Invisibility, I made a big mistake. I didn't see that Dolly unvoted before you voted Jake, thus I backtrack the opportunistic argument.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:54 pm
by Jake The Wolfie
In post 94, alimdia wrote: In post 86, Invisibility wrote: In post 85, alimdia wrote:I'm saying you voting Jake was opportunistic because you could have voted Lil Uzi Vert for the same reason.
So either you didn't see that Lil also didn't post or you wanted to put another vote on Jake.
I voted someone with a vote already on them because that applies more pressure to that specific person? why is that a bad thing?
It was just a contradiction since someone else did the same thing.
This isn't going anywhere
This one the other hand......
This is looks like hard misrepping wtf?
So a call to vote someone isn't calling for people to actually vote them?
eth0s wrote:Yes I would like to ride this wagon
VOTE: jake
Why? Provide your own reads instead of sheeping. Just because you might or might not be read as town does not mean you expect everything you do to be seen as townie.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 2:56 pm
by Kcdaspot
VOTE: Jake the Chihuahua
Yeah this is the lynch today
Hyper defensive is not town. Anyone not on this wagon is a coward