Mafiascum.net

In post 73, ObviousScum wrote:this is nagl

What's that?

In post 75, Hectic wrote:

In post 73, ObviousScum wrote:this is nagl

What's that?

not a good look

In post 68, emps wrote:

In post 67, Hectic wrote:I've changed my mind. VOTE: Jake

wot

explain this one to me

Basically what I said in 66.

Emps seemed to jump from the Hectic wagon to my wagon. Interesting.

In post 78, Jake The Wolfie wrote:Emps seemed to jump from the Hectic wagon to my wagon. Interesting.

you thought my vote on hectic was serious?

i think both were pretty obviously jokes

In post 69, emps wrote:actually now that i look at his posts they seem kinda akward/forced tbh

Why'd you take your vote off me after holding this opinion?

In post 80, Hectic wrote:

In post 69, emps wrote:actually now that i look at his posts they seem kinda akward/forced tbh

Why'd you take your vote off me after holding this opinion?

that was referring to jake fyi

In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes

idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?

In post 82, ObviousScum wrote:

In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes

idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?

i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?

my jake votes kinda serious tho

In post 83, emps wrote:

In post 82, ObviousScum wrote:

In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes

idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?

i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?

my jake votes kinda serious tho

But why was it serious?

In post 84, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

In post 83, emps wrote:

In post 82, ObviousScum wrote:

In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes

idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?

i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?

my jake votes kinda serious tho

But why was it serious?

because your jokes felt forced/overly formal?

In post 85, emps wrote:

In post 84, Jake The Wolfie wrote:

In post 83, emps wrote:

In post 82, ObviousScum wrote:

In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes

idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?

i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?

my jake votes kinda serious tho

But why was it serious?

because your jokes felt forced/overly formal?

Is that good evidence for me being scum, or "look at the trees" evidence?

In post 85, emps wrote:because your jokes felt forced/overly formal?

In post 87, GeorgeBailey wrote:

In post 85, emps wrote:because your jokes felt forced/overly formal?

Spoiler:

is that the right image?

am i missing a joke here

quack

quack

whoa, mod interference!

I'm the real quack here, don't let anyone tell you different

In post 7, Amrun wrote:VOTE: Iconeum

We cannot be doomed to cross voting as town in LyLo again. One of us dies here.

I accept this. It's better for everyone if we get this out of the way now.

VOTE: Amrun

In post 17, emps wrote:hey obviousscum are you by chance an alt of blatant scum

emps you shalleth not fool me again with your gamblers fallacy. You have rolled scum in your last 4 (or is it 5 games), so you are close to 100% scum this time as well.

But I have to kill amrun first so we can win LYLO, please stand by for D2.

In post 89, Non lmh wrote:quack

In post 90, the worst wrote:quack

In post 91, ObviousScum wrote:whoa, mod interference!

I'm the real quack here, don't let anyone tell you different

I hard counter claim all of these. I'm the quack doctor.

#stopmodabuse