Mafiascum.net

Because you're trying to metaread someone that you clearly cannot metaread very well and you were tetering on trying to call them scum based off of that. You can say that "oooohhh noooooo I was just trying to figure it out!" but talking to someone about their meta is about the way to figure someone out using their meta. This is something that was clearly shown through your conversation.

hiraki whats that in repsonse to? the pagetop sort of makes it hard for me to follow the flow of posts

In post 75, Hiraki wrote:Because you're trying to metaread someone that you clearly cannot metaread very well and you were tetering on trying to call them scum based off of that. You can say that "oooohhh noooooo I was just trying to figure it out!" but talking to someone about their meta is about the

worst

way to figure someone out using their meta. This is something that was clearly shown through your conversation.

How do you know I can’t metaread them well?

And my post was as much about announcing my suspicions as the conversation.

Again, I’m not sure what you’re expecting a few pages in, but you’re not exactly offering a lot yourself.

hot take: luca blight is town

In post 74, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 63, Hiraki wrote:

In post 62, Datisi wrote:remeber the game before where we were TvT and screamed at each other for 100 pages before you quickhammered me? good times.

Yeah, I think I just don't like your style, which is fine.

Perfectly fine with my vote atm. This conversation seems more than forced and really dumb. I don't get how a conversation that has nothing to do with the game will help you figure out something that has to do with the game when you don't even have a good grasp of Datasi's meta after 3 pages. And Datasi has the most posts in this game by far without me checking.

Content leads to more content. Simple as that, really.

Not sure what Datisi’s post count has to do with anything.

In post 77, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 75, Hiraki wrote:Because you're trying to metaread someone that you clearly cannot metaread very well and you were tetering on trying to call them scum based off of that. You can say that "oooohhh noooooo I was just trying to figure it out!" but talking to someone about their meta is about the

worst

way to figure someone out using their meta. This is something that was clearly shown through your conversation.

How do you know I can’t metaread them well?

And my post was as much about announcing my suspicions as the conversation.

Again, I’m not sure what you’re expecting a few pages in, but you’re not exactly offering a lot yourself.

ye i agree luca's town

In post 73, bugspray wrote:pedit: no, madoka but it seems like you're definitely trying to convey some meaning and i'm bad at figuring that stuff out

Oh, there's no meaning, I just like to look at them. I'll stick with blue. It never occurred to me that red-green colorblind individuals would have difficulty distinguishing those colors from the background.

In post 80, Madoka wrote:

In post 73, bugspray wrote:pedit: no, madoka but it seems like you're definitely trying to convey some meaning and i'm bad at figuring that stuff out

Oh, there's no meaning, I just like to look at them. I'll stick with blue. It never occurred to me that red-green colorblind individuals would have difficulty distinguishing those colors from the background.

oh alright
i thought from the connatations green/red have here it like actually meant something

In post 76, bugspray wrote:hiraki whats that in repsonse to? the pagetop sort of makes it hard for me to follow the flow of posts

The last post. Yours was not worth responding to.

In post 77, Luca Blight wrote:How do you know I can’t metaread them well?

In post 75, Hiraki wrote:but talking to someone about their meta is about the worst way to figure someone out using their meta. This is something that was clearly shown through your conversation.

In post 77, Luca Blight wrote:Again, I’m not sure what you’re expecting a few pages in, but you’re not exactly offering a lot yourself.

Why do we need to compare ourselves? From the person who can throw suspicion based off of meta reads that aren't very well formed, read is bad now because it's not that weak? Weren't you the one talking about driving conversation?

You’re the one complaining, Hiraki.

I think anything that gets people talking/giving opinions early doors is a positive thing.

In post 77, Luca Blight wrote:but you’re not exactly offering a lot yourself.

This isn't a complaint? What should we characterize it as?

In post 78, Datisi wrote:hot take: luca blight is town

True, but why do you think so?

lamist

Shiki - first non-RVS with an 'eh' reason. good questions, but that's not what makes town. towncreds for meta effort though. i'm not sure if scum goes to the game and says "well im gonna research their meta and make fake townreads based on that, so i can be seen as town."

Datisi - his posts in the early game feels like he's trying too hard to appear like he's trying.
bugspray - said something weird, but that's not what makes scum.
Question to both Datisi and bugspray: Why is Luca Blight town?

Luca Blight - withholding my read.

Holden - not answering's Madoka's questions properly, but could just be tired.
Question: You really think Datisi was pocketing you?

Madoka - Good questions, but that's not what makes town.
Hiraki - i'm getting some scum-cornered vibes.

George Bailey - pops in and out, had the opportunity to hunt a bit, diasppointed that he didn't. not getting a lot of "excited to know more about the town" vibes from him.

How many scum do you think we have in this setup? Is there a possibility of third-party factions?

In post 85, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 78, Datisi wrote:hot take: luca blight is town

True, but why do you think so?

In post 86, bugspray wrote:lamist

this is a bit lamist

but bugspray, you agree that you townread him, so whats up

In post 85, Luca Blight wrote:

In post 78, Datisi wrote:hot take: luca blight is town

True, but why do you think so?

your right into the conversation no beating around the bush straight to the point behaviour. your thoughts make sense to me, and mindmeld on 74 and 77.

who are you calling lamist, bugs?

In post 84, Hiraki wrote:

In post 77, Luca Blight wrote:but you’re not exactly offering a lot yourself.

This isn't a complaint? What should we characterize it as?

Not in the full context, no.

I think you’re read regarding Datisi was fine - it prompted my comment and further discussion. But when you’re criticizing people for dumb conversations and the like, I’d expect to see something superior from yourself?

VOTE: Datisi

let's build this wagon fast

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Hiraki - i'm getting some scum-cornered vibes.

Who on earth is cornering me? My scumread?

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Question to both Datisi and bugspray: Why is Luca Blight town?

answered in 90

In post 91, Luca Blight wrote:But when you’re criticizing people for dumb conversations and the like, I’d expect to see something superior from yourself?

Why?

In post 68, bugspray wrote:luca stands out as townish to me; his tone feels different to that newbie game where i was masons with clidd and he was scum

its just a brainworm meta read

wrt 86
i just really like saying lamist because i pronounce it funny in my brain every time i type it
lamist lamist lamist lamist

In post 93, Hiraki wrote:My scumread?

was there *any point* to you saying "lamist" there?

Oops, thanks for that.