Mafiascum.net

In post 73, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:

In post 71, votato wrote:VOTE: puppy t'is a sad day for humanity when we have to turn on dogs.

This is L-1 btw.

according to the vote count there was 1 vote prior to this page, we've added 3, and lynch is at 7. so its L-3. am i wrong? i could be, but i dont think so.

In post 72, CantHateAPuppy wrote:My vote was on a very weak townread because i liked Quick's answer -- should i leave it there while i look for a better one?

Your non-answer and abject terror are noted.

In post 74, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 59, votato wrote:

In post 58, Blair wrote:VOTE: Puppy

Be advised, I have exited RVS.

in that case: justification? hopping on a wagon without justification post RVS seems bad

*Checks vote count before this*

A wagon you say?

unvote: puppy
Vote: votato

You say that and hop off of the wagon onto one that doesn't exist??

In post 75, votato wrote:

In post 73, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:

In post 71, votato wrote:VOTE: puppy t'is a sad day for humanity when we have to turn on dogs.

This is L-1 btw.

according to the vote count there was 1 vote prior to this page, we've added 3, and lynch is at 7. so its L-3. am i wrong? i could be, but i dont think so.

Ah, I'm thinking it's a newbie game set up. You're correct.

Fortunately for you, VP's recent vote was worse.

VOTE: VP Baltar

P-edit: Oh good, you saw that, too. Join me in my crusade as we march toward a town victory!

also clearly didnt check the vote count prior to voting, or he would have noticed it wasn't L-1. hmm, im torn here. so many places to vote, so few votes to cast...

In post 76, Blair wrote:

In post 72, CantHateAPuppy wrote:My vote was on a very weak townread because i liked Quick's answer -- should i leave it there while i look for a better one?

Your non-answer and abject terror are noted.

Sorry blair, but you can't call me terrified just because you really want it to be true.

In post 80, votato wrote:also clearly didnt check the vote count prior to voting, or he would have noticed it wasn't L-1. hmm, im torn here. so many places to vote, so few votes to cast...

Cast one with me!

VOTE: Atarashi Hajimari

[/sarcasm] Now a younger, less mature Blair would probably point that I did, in fact, just do so - and probably imply that your terror was evident from the way your scumbuddy leapt in to deflate the wagon.

I'm trying to improve myself and grow as a person, however, so I'll settle for asking you to take another stab at that question, because I think you're smart enough to see the problem with your last answer.

... Although, let's be honest... [sarcasm]

FOS: Atarashi Hajimari

I don't think you should "be willing to sheep" "for now" and at the same time put someone at L-2.

Puppy: Great minds think alike.

FoS on Atarashi is fair because I am EXTREMELY susceptible to buddying and I've played with Atarashi before so I suspect he knows that.

Everyone else please start spewing town so we can wrap this one up with minimal complications.

Blair who's my scumbuddy? A page 4 game solution would be a new record.

NPOM -- FOS but no vote?

Ooh, is that an admission that there are only two of you?

(Context screams that I was referring to the person I'm voting for, by the way)

In post 77, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:You say that and hop off of the wagon onto one that doesn't exist??

I don't understand the question.

I'm saying there was no wagon at the time Blair voted. Just my early game vote. It was some classic scum early game "analysis".

Blair, you seem town. Votato is not.

In post 90, VP Baltar wrote:Votato is not.

Say more.

In post 87, CantHateAPuppy wrote:Blair who's my scumbuddy? A page 4 game solution would be a new record.

NPOM -- FOS but no vote?

I still like my vote where it is. They could be scumbuddies for all we know.

Hypothesis: Puppy is not explaining why he took his vote out of play because he knows the more times I ask the more petty it will sound as the game progresses.

Little does he know I do not fear looking petty!

In post 86, Blair wrote:I am EXTREMELY susceptible to buddying

???? You acted the exact opposite to this in our previous game together.

In post 80, votato wrote:also clearly didnt check the vote count prior to voting, or [they] would have noticed it wasn't L-1.

Indeed. I was counting votes. There are two games I'm in right now that are both in the beginning stages of D1. I got them mixed up.

In post 86, Blair wrote:FoS on Atarashi is fair because I am EXTREMELY susceptible to buddying and I've played with Atarashi before so I suspect he knows that.

Everyone else please start spewing town so we can wrap this one up with minimal complications.

This is a searching for town cred statement.

In post 94, Atarashi Hajimari wrote:

In post 86, Blair wrote:I am EXTREMELY susceptible to buddying

???? You acted the exact opposite to this in our previous game together.

Hmm, maybe that was a conclusion I drew after the fact.

Somehow, this exchange was helpful to me. Thank you.

Why is everyone so scummy? Except Quick and Puppy.

In post 84, NoPowerOverMe wrote:FOS: Atarashi Hajimari

Why is this not a vote? C'mon, I'm a big person. I can take it.

[quote="In post 84I don't think you should "be willing to sheep" "for now" [/quote]

The overuse of quotations here is strange. Like...

1. When you say "be willing to sheep", are you trying to say that sheeping in general is bad? Scummy?
2. When you say "for now", are you trying to say that there is a correct time to sheep and an incorrect time to sheep?


[quote="In post 84and at the same time put someone at L-2.[/quote]

As votato correctly pointed it out to me, I did no such thing.