Mafiascum.net

It's also instaloss coz no one would lynch the Jester and the Jester wouldnt lynch scum.

In post 55, YellowSnow wrote:

In post 51, Porkens wrote:

In post 24, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If someone does something scummy on the first page, it's still scummy. Wanting to lynch a claimed jester because we may not find other scum is scummy. Why not just find scum?

Are you defending blurryface or the jesterclaim?

Actually I was attacking Mohab

Ok so were you chainsawing for blurryface or the jesterclaim? https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... aw_Defense

I am scum reading Mohab. Scummy is as scummy does.

I have never played with Jesters in a real mafia site either, and seeing as the only downside is a mislynch, I assumed since everyone here, including me, is a clown, and we're probably going to mislynch anyways, it'd be better to get rid of a Jester if we don't have any better leads. But go off I guess, town.

That's a pretty scummy assumption .

If Jester win doesnt end the game, the Jester HAS to be lynched before LyLo because scum wont kill him.
If Jester win end the game, then Jester claiming Jester is stupid coz then scum kills them.

So ergo, if there's a Jester claim the correct action is to lynch them and let them win, however not skip the day.
This is why I believe that there's no scum incentive in wanting to lynch a Jester claim that Mohab believed to be true, nor is there anything wrong with the reads he got in the early game.

I disagree jester is still town

Norwegian, thoughts on this Jester talk? What do you think should be done if there is a Jester?

In post 76, Porkens wrote:

In post 55, YellowSnow wrote:

In post 51, Porkens wrote:

In post 24, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If someone does something scummy on the first page, it's still scummy. Wanting to lynch a claimed jester because we may not find other scum is scummy. Why not just find scum?

Are you defending blurryface or the jesterclaim?

Actually I was attacking Mohab

Ok so were you chainsawing for blurryface or the jesterclaim? https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... aw_Defense

I like this post. It's NAI or anything, but I like it.

Lynching negative utility is low-hanging fruit in my opinion

In post 83, Quick wrote:

In post 76, Porkens wrote:

In post 55, YellowSnow wrote:

In post 51, Porkens wrote:

In post 24, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If someone does something scummy on the first page, it's still scummy. Wanting to lynch a claimed jester because we may not find other scum is scummy. Why not just find scum?

Are you defending blurryface or the jesterclaim?

Actually I was attacking Mohab

Ok so were you chainsawing for blurryface or the jesterclaim? https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... aw_Defense

I like this post. It's NAI or anything, but I like it.

I wasn't chainsawing anything I was commenting on Mohab exclusively

In post 84, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Lynching negative utility is low-hanging fruit in my opinion

Problem with that is that, Jester isnt exactly negative utility it's literally a different win condition, sure they can help town... if they want to, but their win condition encourages them to do things like acting scummy on purpose, spam posting, active lurking or who knows what else to encourage people to lynch them.

Of course a claimed Jester means a Jester willing to work with the town in exchange for being lynched so they can win, so in the end they have to be lynched too anyway and scum gets a free NK at some point.

So no, they arent town.

They are a voting member of the town.

In post 85, NoPowerOverMe wrote:

In post 83, Quick wrote:

In post 76, Porkens wrote:

In post 55, YellowSnow wrote:

In post 51, Porkens wrote:

In post 24, NoPowerOverMe wrote:If someone does something scummy on the first page, it's still scummy. Wanting to lynch a claimed jester because we may not find other scum is scummy. Why not just find scum?

Are you defending blurryface or the jesterclaim?

Actually I was attacking Mohab

Ok so were you chainsawing for blurryface or the jesterclaim? https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... aw_Defense

I like this post. It's NAI or anything, but I like it.

I wasn't chainsawing anything I was commenting on Mohab exclusively

I just like that he linked it. Didn't really look at what he was implying. That's quite defensive of you though. Why so serious?

In post 77, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I am scum reading Mohab. Scummy is as scummy does.

In post 79, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's a pretty scummy assumption .

Why is it scummy to make that assumption?

I mean I get that they are third-party but there's no benefit in lynching them over scum

In post 81, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I disagree jester is still town

? its a third party role

In post 87, NoPowerOverMe wrote:They are a voting member of the town.

not that this shit matters, this is a normal

In post 89, Porkens wrote:

In post 77, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I am scum reading Mohab. Scummy is as scummy does.

In post 79, NoPowerOverMe wrote:That's a pretty scummy assumption .

Why is it scummy to make that assumption?

Because Town should always want to lunch scumover a jester in my opinion

In post 92, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 87, NoPowerOverMe wrote:They are a voting member of the town.

I hope you try hard this game. I liked your play in the other one ftr.

In post 93, popopopopopopo wrote:not that this shit matters, this is a normal

Normally I'd agree, but there were some people that believed Jester to be able to be included in a Normal and have done behaviour that can be analysed on that context.

We can't talk about ongoing games even vague comments.

In post 95, Quick wrote:

In post 92, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 87, NoPowerOverMe wrote:They are a voting member of the town.

I hope you try hard this game. I liked your play in the other one ftr.

bro that shit was so TILTING do not get me started, you came in with the HEAT

In post 95, Quick wrote:

In post 92, popopopopopopo wrote:

In post 87, NoPowerOverMe wrote:They are a voting member of the town.

I hope you try hard this game. I liked your play in the other one ftr.

Not that it mattered in the end.