Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2020 6:56 am
im not saying the self-vote was 100% a scumslip, but its something to be looking at going forward.
So you are saying my self vote was a scum slip?In post 75, votato wrote:im not saying the self-vote was 100% a scumslip, but its something to be looking at going forward.
What do you mean in "our" experience?Tuxedo Mask wrote:Not in our experience.In post 65, votato wrote:I've heard self- voting in rvs is almost always done by scum. Can anyone confirm that?
Votato's "scumslip" is a reach and a half but this reaction reads like you are very anxious to defend yourselfIn post 76, Midari Ikishima wrote:So you are saying my self vote was a scum slip?
Or could be something to note later in the game when I don't find it for anything else but humour. Due to it was posted with a gif of me with a gun to my head.
I think you are reaching a bit there. I mean I thought we were still in RVS. I have you in my town pile for now but it feels a bit reaching.
i think we know better than to pay attention to anything you doIn post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...
why do you townread me then?In post 76, Midari Ikishima wrote:So you are saying my self vote was a scum slip?In post 75, votato wrote:im not saying the self-vote was 100% a scumslip, but its something to be looking at going forward.
Or could be something to note later in the game when I don't find it for anything else but humour. Due to it was posted with a gif of me with a gun to my head.
I think you are reaching a bit there. I mean I thought we were still in RVS. I have you in my town pile for now but it feels a bit reaching.
What do you mean in "our" experience?Tuxedo Mask wrote:Not in our experience.In post 65, votato wrote:I've heard self- voting in rvs is almost always done by scum. Can anyone confirm that?
UnvoteFor now. I want to hear more from everyone else.
@Mod: There are less then 13 not voting....
Gah! I've been outted! It's not suicidal though, I have legit reasons...but nobody cares.In post 80, Deimos27 wrote:From what I've seen of you Battle Mage, it's completely within your meta to play suicidally in RVS, and I don't really know what I gain from voting you for that.
It took you this long to shade me for no reason? You must be scum here! VOTE: votatoIn post 79, votato wrote:i think we know better than to pay attention to anything you doIn post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...
I've seen it done by town D1, but not in RVS.In post 65, votato wrote:I've heard self- voting in rvs is almost always done by scum. Can anyone confirm that?
In post 45, Deimos27 wrote:VOTE: word321
To create a favourable vote distribution that precipitates effective scumhunting, of course.
Mind running this one by me? Feels like you're trying to stay neutral and keep even distribution, but I don't see to what end.In post 58, Deimos27 wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: ceejay
Townlean brassherald for making a high-quality RVS vote.
Townping from votatoIn post 81, votato wrote: why do you townread me then?
You mean besides this?In post 78, Battle Mage wrote:I am surprised nobody is shading me for voting no lynch...
We're talking about the Treestump game we played where a townie self voted on like page 2.In post 81, votato wrote:What do you mean in "our" experience?
By "we" and "our" are you referring to yourself and votato?In post 86, Tuxedo Mask wrote:We're talking about the Treestump game we played where a townie self voted on like page 2.In post 81, votato wrote:What do you mean in "our" experience?
Yes.In post 87, Marashu wrote:By "we" and "our" are you referring to yourself and votato?In post 86, Tuxedo Mask wrote:We're talking about the Treestump game we played where a townie self voted on like page 2.In post 81, votato wrote:What do you mean in "our" experience?
"Staying neutral" is an odd way to put it. I genuinely think my vote is currently in a good location, regardless of vote distributions.In post 84, Marashu wrote:In post 45, Deimos27 wrote:VOTE: word321
To create a favourable vote distribution that precipitates effective scumhunting, of course.Mind running this one by me? Feels like you're trying to stay neutral and keep even distribution, but I don't see to what end.In post 58, Deimos27 wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: ceejay
Townlean brassherald for making a high-quality RVS vote.
I voted him because that's what the cool kids are doing.In post 90, Deimos27 wrote:I am assuming that brassherald's reason for voting ceejay is the same as mine. If not, I rescind my townlean.
The cool kids are the trendsetters.In post 92, Deimos27 wrote:I thought the cool kids were voting Midari, and you were trying to be a trendsetter by voting someone else