Mafiascum.net

In post 72, Datisi wrote:

In post 71, Gypyx wrote:You

(daitsi)

have some pretty susp placement, but i'm waiting to see more

who?

I'm bad at reading names

the hoopla argument is a fence-sit -> 'i like this, but i don't like that, not sure'

the datisi argument is a fence-sit -> 'you did x, which is suspicious, but meh'

the smart argument is a fence-sit -> 'smart has a weird entry, but it's gut. Let's vote this'

SS confirmed town, gypyx scum

you can thank me later

not to mention the entire post was made after datisi called gypyx out to say *something relevant*

so gypyx:

what did you think was weird about SS's entry?
why is datisi suspicous for the number, but not someone else who also picked that number?

In post 78, Iconeum wrote:not to mention the entire post was made after datisi called gypyx out to say *something relevant*

Well uh yea that kinda was the point of the post? Like datisi asked me for thoughts, i provide them

it's not an opinion if you don't have a conclusion to it

which is why i think it was a very scummy post: you tried to give an answer to datisi, but without *actually* having to do anything

gypyx, it was a serious question tho: why is datisi's placement suspicious, but not Marquis?

I see, didn't really think this post through to be fair, i think i've just been overexagerating the fact that these reads are not reliable because there's not much content if you get what i'm saying, anyways bascially i think i'm confident enough on these posts, and i have high trust in my gut

Marquis's is susp too, i just focused on the current posters

do you have no thoughts on my posts so far?

I don't have thoughts yeah

In post 84, Gypyx wrote:I see, didn't really think this post through to be fair, i think i've just been overexagerating the fact that these reads are not reliable because there's not much content if you get what i'm saying, anyways bascially i think i'm confident enough on these posts, and i have high trust in my gut

Marquis's is susp too, i just focused on the current posters

then why'd you bother making the post if this is the case?

In post 29, Datisi wrote:duck, is that because i'm not in the scuM PT WITH YOU YOU SCUMDUCK

: (
damnit guys wrap it up, he caught us.

In post 39, Hoopla wrote:

In post 38, Datisi wrote:i don't think it's necessarily town!indicative this time around though. you?

may have rolled town.
may have figured out that as scum participating in the jokes & early game narratives is a safer opening than the forced scumhunting routine.

i perch happily on this fence.

i was just thinking that, any room left on that fence?

In post 46, Hoopla wrote:so, in those 14 games, how often do you think scum have gone for a WIFOM-play and selected the same number as a buddy? have a guess.

yughrguyhreu 0 or 1

i've caught scum, duck!

quack 'em for me will ya

In post 88, Iconeum wrote:

In post 84, Gypyx wrote:I see, didn't really think this post through to be fair, i think i've just been overexagerating the fact that these reads are not reliable because there's not much content if you get what i'm saying, anyways bascially i think i'm confident enough on these posts, and i have high trust in my gut

Marquis's is susp too, i just focused on the current posters

then why'd you bother making the post if this is the case?

Wdym?

In post 50, Hoopla wrote:positions

you missed 413 and i am so upset.

oh positions
yeah
i'm awake.

In post 57, Hoopla wrote:413 - x

yeah ty i'm happy now

In post 93, Gypyx wrote:

In post 88, Iconeum wrote:

In post 84, Gypyx wrote:I see,

didn't really think this post through to be fair, i think i've just been overexagerating the fact that these reads are not reliable because there's not much content if you get what i'm saying

, anyways bascially i think i'm confident enough on these posts, and i have high trust in my gut

Marquis's is susp too, i just focused on the current posters

then why'd you bother making the post if this is the case?

Wdym?

why did you bother to make a response post that you don't support, as shown by the bolded

In post 69, Green Crayons wrote:VOTE: Ico

hey talk to me about this? i don't think it was random, and that is a weird and mystical and exciting feeling.

In post 97, Iconeum wrote:

In post 93, Gypyx wrote:

In post 88, Iconeum wrote:

In post 84, Gypyx wrote:I see,

didn't really think this post through to be fair, i think i've just been overexagerating the fact that these reads are not reliable because there's not much content if you get what i'm saying

, anyways bascially i think i'm confident enough on these posts, and i have high trust in my gut

Marquis's is susp too, i just focused on the current posters

then why'd you bother making the post if this is the case?

Wdym?

why did you bother to make a response post that you don't support, as shown by the bolded

Just that my mind changed between the response post and you questioning me about the response