Mafiascum.net

In post 904, Bell wrote:Maybe I just really like Flea's posting this game and I'm biased tho.

In post 909, Taly wrote:
i refuse to be LHF this game, ill do stuff soon.

i legit have had 9 hours nonstop of working on assignments, i have 5+ projects/tests due in less than 2 weeks, and as soon as tomorrow.

i also have 2 doctor's appointments tomorrow and Friday because my body is rebelling

i
am
fucked

but yeah, sorry if im a bit ambiguous rn. ill utilize it as a means to gamesolve soon.

Nope, can't reach. You're not LHF. Also hope you're ok <3 try not to burn out, drink water and do the self care! (> ^_^ )>

In post 916, Alisae wrote:

In post 913, SirCakez wrote:

In post 741, Alisae wrote:the more im thinking about the tasks the more I am going to dread doing them.

In post 742, Alisae wrote:honestly makes me just want to not do tasks but i feel like that's unfair to my team

town af posting from Alisae
keep doing you Ali

i am going to deathtunnel you

OOOO lemme get popcorn first ◕‿↼

In post 936, Bell wrote:I demand Taly focus on their life instead of playing mafia until such time as they are less preoccupied.
Life should be lived in the moment.
What a lovely platitude.

(۶•̀ᴗ•́)۶

In post 952, MURDERCAT wrote:VOTE: Blitzo

I think I'm ready to leave RVS

We're still in RVS? o.o

In post 960, Akarin wrote:So I've yet to see an argument for why the game would be designed around tasks being pointless, despite people asserting this to be true.

They're not pointless and should definitely be done as it's a viable wincon, just not the de-facto wincon. Same as in game, you're trying to find the imposters and complete your tasks. It's a viable wincon, not the de-facto wincon and honestly I've rarely seen a game where it's a task win. This is why I'm more skeptical on BM's "HAH no scumhunting required"

In post 966, Akarin wrote:It's frustrating because I feel like people's eyes started glazing over at the mech talk and they just shut their brains down and stopped thinking about it.

People don't like being told how to play their game I guess and want to do their own thing.

In post 977, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 974, TheGoldenParadox wrote:obviously i can't prove this, but i think blitzo wrote this AFTER previewing and faked it

Probably not but this is a town thing to say I think

On the other hand, I think this is engineering a miselim on LHF using some stretchy reasoning that doesn' require proof. (´･＿･‘)

In post 983, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 977, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 974, TheGoldenParadox wrote:obviously i can't prove this, but i think blitzo wrote this AFTER previewing and faked it

Probably not but this is a town thing to say I think

battle mage is like, fairly town to me and i'm not inclined to eliminate there

buddys? I dunno. I don't know either player and this seems like a sloppy play if they are, not sure what I think here. (｡･~･｡)

In post 984, Blitzo wrote:PEDIT - #973 is simply not a good post.

Agreed, that's just like "HAH you can't say that, because half the game is like that!" In some people it can be tell.

In post 994, Blitzo wrote:You are correct that I am misnumbering - it was 974, not 973.

In post 974, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 972, Blitzo wrote:My second thought was that TGP was entirely forgettable.
I might let that develop for a bit and see what happens.

obviously i can't prove this, but i think blitzo wrote this AFTER previewing and faked it so they didn't

Already covered this. Still think 973 is a bit stinky though

In post 999, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 561, OutWorldER wrote:

In post 544, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also reminding people Reck scumslipped in a post

Which post was the scumslip? Are you talking about 121?

no it was a longer one
he said "we nk" in a way that looks like he wrote up the post in the scum PT and left that in accidentally.

Linky?

In post 1004, xRECKONERx wrote:

In post 912, SirCakez wrote:

In post 732, xRECKONERx wrote:TOWN
titus, gammaem, flea, outworlder*

AT LEAST ONE SCUM
alisae, battlemage, murdercat, pooky, cakez, tgp

SOME BIG NULL PILE SOMEWHERE
dgb, taly, blitzo, haschel

SCUMMY OUTSIDE OF MASSCLAIM BULLSHIT
murdercat, akarin, bell

what the fuck is this readslist

it's a readlist, nice of you to quote it and ask what it is

do you want to like, ask an actual question? or u just makin noise?

(ᗒᗜᗕ)՛̵̖

In post 1005, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 565, Flea The Magician wrote:GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORNIN CREW!

I think Flea is town
(for the entire post, not just the explicitly quoted part, I just took the top)

In fairness the top is the best part about that post imo And the upside down face at the bottom

In post 1016, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1015, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 585, SirCakez wrote:Personally I feel OER or Bell are the more likely scums there, not BM

why
tbh Titus' reads seem sensible

BM is playing to town meta

As much as I dislike meta... this is worrying.

In post 1021, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1016, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1015, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 585, SirCakez wrote:Personally I feel OER or Bell are the more likely scums there, not BM

why
tbh Titus' reads seem sensible

BM is playing to town meta

I think this is legitimately wrong

This is interesting, and less worrying.

In post 1022, xRECKONERx wrote:do tasks, kill obvscum, win

play mafia

like people generally do

!(•̀ᴗ•́)و ̑̑

In post 1024, xRECKONERx wrote:i made it real big 4 u

( ^ิ艸^ิﾟ)

In post 1032, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:right now im thinking

we do

3 to a room for 5 roomes
2 people solo (they don't say where they go)

if there's a bonus NK it has to be in a room where 2 scum - 1 town were

hence we get a double guilty.

Thoughts?

What if both NKs are in rooms with 2 people in?

In post 1035, Titus wrote:

In post 1028, SirCakez wrote:BM is lurk fuck as scum and actually plays as town

Can his lurksackness be attributed to real life?

@Gamma, What do you mean by chaotic versus not chaotic?

Me here. Me in Death Curse. Ta-daaaaaa!
Oh wait, about BM. ok.

In post 1043, MURDERCAT wrote:I am guessing there is a lights sabotage that messes with this. But there might also be a sabotage cooldown??

This would be a reasonable expectation. Lights Sab is one of the strongest things in the game so I'd be surprised if it's not in here to mess with us somehow.

In post 1047, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1017, Blitzo wrote:@DGB - was this whole scumread thing a ploy to get me to vote for BM?

No - I want the game to hop.

U(´･×･`)U _boⁱn_g!

In post 1053, Akarin wrote:Okay, so using the magic of random.org, I did a night where everyone goes to a random room:
Assume 4 Imposters, everyone goes to a random room (Imposters can do better than this)

• Cafeteria: Crew #4
• Weapons: Crew #11, Imposter #4
• Navigation: Crew #6, Crew #12, Imposter #1, Imposter #3
• Shields: Crew #1, Crew #13
• Communications: Crew #3, Crew #7
• Admin: Crew #8
• Electrical: Crew #5, Crew #9
• Security:
• Reactor: Crew #2
• Upper Engine: Crew #10, Imposter #2

---

Say Crew #10 dies as a bonus kill to Imposter #2, and they use their normal kill on

Crew #11

.

Imposter #2 and Imposter #4 clear each other. Imposters #1 and #3 are cleared by a big group of town.
Crew #4, #8, #2 are suspicious.

Or if they really wanted to NK crew #9, for example, then Crew #5 has no one to vouch for them either, while

one of the Imposters is cleared by town and only 1 is left in a pool of suspicion with 4 townies.

FTFY. Also Imposters 2 and 4 would be under suspicion at that point imo as one of them would have had to kill, meaning neither is clear. Crew 4, 8 and 2 would also be suspect as well.

Ohwait, is this assuming chaos theory and not organised chaos? Never mind, I see your point.
That said, this is a pretty valid point on using chaos. hmm... It also depends on if the rooms get new PTs every night I guess, or if admin or security has MIRA HQ style logs?

In post 1055, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 1053, Akarin wrote:everyone goes to a random room (Imposters can do better than this)

Everyone agrees this is bad though right? We need to at least let the people who want to group, group.

MINE!

In post 1062, Titus wrote:

In post 1061, Akarin wrote:

In post 1055, MURDERCAT wrote:Everyone agrees this is bad though right? We need to at least let the people who want to group, group.

If it's like 5 people trying to group it's not much different than random is the point.

And no, I'm not sure everyone agrees this is bad. A lot of people keep saying things that make me think they

don't

actually agree this is bad.

Random means we don't accomplish tasks.

I'm not doing random. Period.

No so much random as in we just randomly disperse to an assigned room, more random in that we just all go to a random location based on individual choice. So lets say I head straight to storage for my looongboi task whch s gng t b fn t d - I don't know If anyone else is coming with me or where anyone else is going, and is thus a random distribution.