In post 62, Porkens wrote:Grendal didn’t even wait for my answer before they voted for me and called me the scummiest on the roster, despite citing no reasoning except that which applies to another player as well.
Grendal, what makes me scummier than everyone else?
Well, what exactly were you agreeing with in mark's op?
Answer that first please
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:20 am
by Porkens
No, you need to explain why you said I was scummy without having given me a chance to answer or not. If you had waited, I’d be under the gun, but you didn’t so now your under priority.
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:39 am
by Vaxkiller
Ill stop this nonsense, both of you answer all questions!
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 10:53 am
by cassowary
In post 52, Grendel wrote:Also, I'd like you thoughts on Porken when you get the chance. Maybe even a vote if you are feeling it.
Uh, I don't really see what you're seeing here, to be honest.
Re flavor claims: I do agree flavor almost certainly is not alignment-indicative, bc my flavor character doesn't match my alignment. That said, I don't really see the point of doing flavor claims except, like, for fun? It seems kind of game-irrelevant? I'm happy to flavor claim if we decide we want to do that, though.
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 10:56 am
by cassowary
Wait... if porkens thought flavor could be AI but didn't want to claim their flavor (#40), does that imply they thought their flavor was incriminating and could reveal their alignment to be mafia? Hmm... food for thought.
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 11:05 am
by cassowary
In post 49, Grendel wrote:Also curious why Porken/Mystix were both so evasive about role claiming if they both feel its non-ai here.
I guess this is what Grendel was saying. I think it's a good point and I'm kind of curious why porkens has jumped on trying to flip the suspicion back on grendel rather than just, like... answering the question here? I mean, if you think Grendel is trying to frame you here, surely your case would be bolstered by countering his assumption about your reasoning rather than just basically going "well why didn't you vote for mistyx then" (mistyx didn't think flavor is AI at the time, so she's not as sus in this situation imo)
yeah ok, i'm down for this logic, at least for now
VOTE: porkens
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 11:26 am
by Flea The Magician
In post 17, cassowary wrote:i'd prefer a nice green tea if you could, it's a bit late in the day and i don't want to be up all night
Lovely to play with you again Flea - I really felt for you when you threw yourself on vax, just for the town to elim him anyway, in our previous game together
Night all
istg if that happens again in this game amma be miffed...
Just because you're a god doesn't mean your wagon is good.
goog gods. god is in good, so my wagon is good. Bask amongst my glory.
Not all gods are good.
In fact, I'd argue that no gods exist, or if they do, then they hide from us so they funtionally don't exist.
There is only 1 truly bad deity imo. But we'll leave religion at the door
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 11:32 am
by Porkens
In post 79, cassowary wrote:Wait... if porkens thought flavor could be AI but didn't want to claim their flavor (#40), does that imply they thought their flavor was incriminating and could reveal their alignment to be mafia? Hmm... food for thought.
My flavor would give scum a great guess at my role.
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:28 pm
by Turin Turambar
VOTE: Vaxkiller
I got cursed by a jerkass God, so I don't trust Gods...
In post 79, cassowary wrote:Wait... if porkens thought flavor could be AI but didn't want to claim their flavor (#40), does that imply they thought their flavor was incriminating and could reveal their alignment to be mafia? Hmm... food for thought.
My flavor would give scum a great guess at my role.
Noted. Will revisit this later. UNVOTE:
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:42 pm
by cassowary
Yeah, that makes sense.
UNVOTE: porkens
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:27 pm
by Marky Mark
In post 74, Porkens wrote:It wasn’t really a comment on “tone.” The words we choose have desired effects. The words you chose seem to be LAMIST and specifically designed in other ways to seem town. In short, I think you are trying to “look town” moreso than a genuine town would feel necessary.
I mean yeah, it's definitely that and not anything else.
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:28 pm
by Marky Mark
@Porkens and Grendel pls just both answer each other's questions and stop arguing over who answers first. Would be interesting to hear from both of you
I got cursed by a jerkass God, so I don't trust Gods...
I feel like we've kinda started to move beyond RVS - do you have any thoughts on any of the preceding 82 posts?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:34 pm
by Porkens
In post 87, Marky Mark wrote:@Porkens and Grendel pls just both answer each other's questions and stop arguing over who answers first. Would be interesting to hear from both of you
In post 74, Porkens wrote:It wasn’t really a comment on “tone.” The words we choose have desired effects. The words you chose seem to be LAMIST and specifically designed in other ways to seem town. In short, I think you are trying to “look town” moreso than a genuine town would feel necessary.
I mean yeah, it's definitely that and not anything else.
What else is it?
In post 87, Marky Mark wrote:@Porkens and Grendel pls just both answer each other's questions and stop arguing over who answers first. Would be interesting to hear from both of you
My answer is on this page, above two posts that responded to it.
I got cursed by a jerkass God, so I don't trust Gods...
I feel like we've kinda started to move beyond RVS - do you have any thoughts on any of the preceding 82 posts?
Hm, okay.
Your eagerness to create content is interesting to me, although I do not find anything you've done hard to fake as of yet. I am curious, do you usually try to get slightly late RVS voters to give thoughts, or was this done on more of a whim, perhaps related to how excited you are to play this game?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:37 pm
by Fidget
I get that Grendel probably has his hands full answering questions at the moment, but I'd love to toss another one into the thunderdome for him whenever he's gotten those sorted, if this question does not get answered: was your claim that Porkens is the scummiest player related to the curiosity around misty/porkens not claiming flavor?
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 3:15 pm
by Vaxkiller
VOTE: Marky Mark
ez
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 6:21 pm
by Gamma Emerald
So through Star Fox 64 is how I believe I found the channel of one Parabeetle X. I really like his soundfont covers for how unique they sound, by which I mean sometimes it’ll sound like something you wouldn’t guess from either the original song or the soundfont used for the cover. I might show one off via flavor video later, once this story is completed.
Time to put on our thinking caps and batter some scum.
VOTE: Jake 1v1 me bro
--pedit: we are so in sync, Mistyx. Townbloc is clearly already forming
While I agree, I simultaneously find this post to be contrived and therefore suspicious. Let’s prosecute this.
vote: Marky Mark
I'll sheep this.
VOTE: Mark
FTR I meant I agree that we need to “put our thinking caps on and batter some scum.”
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:59 pm
by Grendel
In post 76, Porkens wrote:No, you need to explain why you said I was scummy without having given me a chance to answer or not. If you had waited, I’d be under the gun, but you didn’t so now your under priority.
Apologies, I was eager to get the game out of RVS
my 1st for scum reading you was that saying something positive about Marky, then aggressing them in the next breathe seemed off to me. I was curoius if you actully agreed with something he posted, or scum you was just looking for a quick easy RVS vote
the 2nd was the avoidance of role claiming. Casswoary actually called out my logic there spot on lol.
Spoiler:
In post 79, cassowary wrote:Wait... if porkens thought flavor could be AI but didn't want to claim their flavor (#40), does that imply they thought their flavor was incriminating and could reveal their alignment to be mafia? Hmm... food for thought.
In post 79, cassowary wrote:Wait... if porkens thought flavor could be AI but didn't want to claim their flavor (#40), does that imply they thought their flavor was incriminating and could reveal their alignment to be mafia? Hmm... food for thought.
My flavor would give scum a great guess at my role.
townie pr is a more likely to make a hasty assertion like this then scum is imo. Hasty equal less then 48 hours into the day phase, and there only being a few votes on Porkens. Scum could just lay low and let pressure flow else where.
UNVOTE:
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:06 pm
by Grendel
In post 91, Fidget wrote:I get that Grendel probably has his hands full answering questions at the moment, but I'd love to toss another one into the thunderdome for him whenever he's gotten those sorted, if this question does not get answered: was your claim that Porkens is the scummiest player related to the curiosity around misty/porkens not claiming flavor?
this points against Fidget/Cass/marky team. All three in one why or another asked for elaboration on my Porkens scum lean.
Scum would try to coordinate their movement/attention more diversely then that.
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:08 pm
by Grendel
Marky mark definitely is leaning hard into playing, "Town voice of reason." A favorite of scum's in the early game.