Mafiascum.net

In post 68, Roden wrote:That's true for any alignment lol. It's the fact that you said you weren't paying attention even though you clearly were is what feels off to me.

Explain how I clearly was. I think my shift from being in the game to not being in the game is pretty clear.

Titus has played with me before and she can confirm that I don’t always read carefully in the beginning. Or maybe she doesn’t pay that much attention to my play, I dunno.

In post 69, T3 wrote:I lowkey don't like ramy or rodens shading of each other.

Am I shading Roden? I feel like I’m just trying address their doubts about me while assuming good faith.

Like, I feel like it’s too early to guess someone’s motive. The only player I think I’ve shaded is the one my vote is on. Oh, and I called someone’s bloodline weak.

In post 75, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 68, Roden wrote:That's true for any alignment lol. It's the fact that you said you weren't paying attention even though you clearly were is what feels off to me.

Explain how I clearly was. I think my shift from being in the game to not being in the game is pretty clear.

Titus has played with me before and she can confirm that I don’t always read carefully in the beginning. Or maybe she doesn’t pay that much attention to my play, I dunno.

It was your response and your vote adding to a mini wagon on T3 right after he claimed Miller that just felt too convenient for you to have not read anything yet.

Don't get me wrong, this isn't tunnel worthy or anything, it just felt off and I wanted to know how others felt since Bugspray didn't seem to like one of your other posts either.

In post 76, Rannygazoo wrote:

In post 69, T3 wrote:I lowkey don't like ramy or rodens shading of each other.

Am I shading Roden? I feel like I’m just trying address their doubts about me while assuming good faith.

Actually I think that's fair.

@everyone, thoughts on roden/ramy interactions?

Also townpoints for Roden for 78.

In post 74, T3 wrote:excallq don't get an avatar.

It's more that I think they're both slightly scummy for that.

How can we both be scummy if you don't think we're both scum?

Actually I think I get what you mean by that.

I don't think the interactions signify either s/s or t/t or t/s.

Bug is town.

hi; I just got here (have been travelling)

post 24 makes excallq look very suspicious

ill do RQS in a few hours when i have computer accessability

In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.

I mean hello everyone.

This looked pretty clearly like a joke to me.

In post 85, cw357 wrote:hi; I just got here (have been travelling)

post 24 makes excallq look very suspicious

ill do RQS in a few hours when i have computer accessability

Can't sleep.... people are blaring their tv. And it's not even something good, it's an antiques show /j

It's 10:26 in the beautiful land of the east coast of the united states so I really suld be sleeping but every time I nod off I hear from a block over: "THAT'S AN INCREDIBLE $5000 SILVE CUP MADE IN 1400S CHINA" or something ridiculous.

Oh yeah I meant to VOTE: cw

oh look a solid silver life size goat

In post 85, cw357 wrote:hi; I just got here (have been travelling)

post 24 makes excallq look very suspicious

ill do RQS in a few hours when i have computer accessability

This is a first, promising to do RQS later. Why RQS?

In post 86, T3 wrote:

In post 24, excallq wrote:I am posting because it will look suspicious if I don't.

I mean hello everyone.

This looked pretty clearly like a joke to me.

Of all the things I saw, 24 was the most scum-indicative. It looked like nervous scum who didn’t know what to say. Joking to alleviate the nervousness is a tactic.

However, the fact that cw agrees with me makes me rethink it. I was in cw’s last game and I have some thoughts about it, but I’ll keep them to myself for as long as they remain irrelevant to finding scum in this game.

Setup analysis time

@DGB you’re pretty old. Does ‘miller who was informed that there’s a macho 2-shot cop’ make sense from a balance perspective?

I mean, site meta is that millers claim ASAP, so the mods and reviewers must have known that an informed miller would share immediately, if what T3 says is true

It's entirely possible he was given more information and is waiting to share it at a more optimal time. Or, he might need to survive more rounds to gain more information. I don't think it would be hard to verify him as a Miller either.

In post 91, Rannygazoo wrote: Of all the things I saw, 24 was the most scum-indicative. It looked like nervous scum who didn’t know what to say. Joking to alleviate the nervousness is a tactic.

New to forum but not new to game. If night one when literally no attention is being paid to me were enough to make me nervous scum I'd probably have given this game up long ago.

In post 84, DrippingGoofball wrote:Bug is town.

can you please make real posts?

In post 92, Rannygazoo wrote:Setup analysis time

@DGB you’re pretty old. Does ‘miller who was informed that there’s a macho 2-shot cop’ make sense from a balance perspective?

Apart from claims by myself, does anyone take seriously any claim made in the first 10 pages?

In post 97, geraintm wrote:

In post 92, Rannygazoo wrote:Setup analysis time

@DGB you’re pretty old. Does ‘miller who was informed that there’s a macho 2-shot cop’ make sense from a balance perspective?

Apart from claims by myself, does anyone take seriously any claim made in the first 10 pages?

yes

In post 85, cw357 wrote:ill do RQS in a few hours

Don't bother. RQS is a scumtell anyway