In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
VOTE: t3
I already responded to this. Also, I think Titus's 'mindmeld' is towny.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:19 am
by T3
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
Oh wait NVM I didn't respond to this.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:35 am
by Alchemist21
In post 54, Datisi wrote:another person that i kind of dislike right now is alchemist. something feels very scummy-nitpicky about his 39/41/43. like, it feels wrong that alch ia shading umlaut for not pressing seanzie while going for flubber just because umlaut didn't find coyness townie. umlaut found flubber's push to be suspicious so he went there, why would town!umlaut automatically have to be evaluating the pushee as well?
It may be nitpicky but I’m trying to understand Umlaut’s motivation here. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect him to have reacted to the slot literally everyone else was reacting to.
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
Let me have bad reads in peace.
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
Let me have bad reads in peace.
This post is in a weird place between “I know it’s a joke” and “dude wtf” for me. I haven’t liked any of T3’s posts so far.
VOTE: T3
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:46 am
by Vulture
How does one man who joins so many mafia games never learn.
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
Let me have bad reads in peace.
This post is in a weird place between “I know it’s a joke” and “dude wtf” for me. I haven’t liked any of T3’s posts so far.
VOTE: T3
My post was like 50% a joke and also 50% this is also the "scummy I know how I play excuse"
In post 68, Datisi wrote:while it's far from the first time i get some suspicion my way for my tone of speaking, i do kind of expect better from someone who's already played a few games with me.
Let me have bad reads in peace.
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
+1 to this.
You make a good point, I was probably being somewhat hyprocritical.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 4:21 am
by Alchemist21
In post 82, Vulture wrote:How does one man who joins so many mafia games never learn.
This post is worse than the antagonizing post itself.
There’s not a lot more I have to add to this that hasn’t been said. Umlaut jumped on what we were all thinking.
Datisi felt different this game than the last one I played with him in a way I can’t word exactly, but noticed.
Vulture can have a townlean. They are looking at early interactions in a towny critical way. Not unfakable, but a good look. Also, the "I have a gut read but I can't articulate it" thing I think comes from town a lot more than scum.
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
In post 73, Datisi wrote:if flubber was reacting to something that wasn't rvs, then flubber's own post can't have been rvs either, right? so why are you suspecting umlaut for taking flubber's "rvs" interaction too seriously?
Oh wait NVM I didn't respond to this.
So uhh.... are you going to?
He's right.
And the followup question?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:21 am
by Datisi
hate to be annoying, but... why are you voting umlaut then? >_>
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:22 am
by T3
In post 91, Datisi wrote:hate to be annoying, but... why are you voting umlaut then? >_>
Oh, that. UNVOTE:
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:24 am
by Datisi
if that were almost anyone else, i'd start screaming for their head because they're obviously making it up as they go, but gut tells me this is not *completely* out of t3's townrange.
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:27 am
by tris
,
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:27 am
by tris
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 5:29 am
by tris
i'm just going to leave that there. i don't know why i thought i was going to get a pagetop lol