Mafiascum.net

In post 74, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm town so i'm not going to

Prove it give me a reason to have faith in you.

In post 70, cyrus62 wrote:@nathann unvote your self to show me I can work with you

I don't maybe see the point, not like I can single-handedly push a Coalition with myself in it through, but sure.

HURT: Nathann

Why did you decide to trust me right after my last post? You can answer this later if you want to hear Pavowski's answer first, but I am curious.

And why do you find that someone hurting themselves is Town!indicative? Or rather, why do you keep asking that people do so?

if i were scum i'd hurt myself to appease you

In post 77, Save The Dragons wrote:if i were scum i'd hurt myself to appease you

I was literally thinking of writing out a post how Save The Dragons is mildly Townie for not hurting himself, as I imagined Scum!him would've done that for appearances.

I want to say Scum wouldn't be this blatant about it either... Not sure yet, though.

In post 76, Nathann wrote:

In post 70, cyrus62 wrote:@nathann unvote your self to show me I can work with you

I don't maybe see the point, not like I can single-handedly push a Coalition with myself in it through, but sure.

HURT: Nathann

Why did you decide to trust me right after my last post? You can answer this later if you want to hear Pavowski's answer first, but I am curious.

And why do you find that someone hurting themselves is Town!indicative? Or rather, why do you keep asking that people do so?

Scum need 1 person in the 5 to not lose town can win if two town are not in 5 we can still win scum will refuse to hurt them selfs. I started trusted you since you were willing to add pav and me to your 5.

Just disagree with this. Scum can absolutely hurt themselves. Scum can even be named to the coalition without voting themselves onto it.

Self-hurting is not a townlock on anybody. And btw saying "self-hurt so I know I can work with you" is giving scum a roadmap to how to play you.

And I'm not sure about Nathann yet.

In post 80, Pavowski wrote:Just disagree with this. Scum can absolutely hurt themselves. Scum can even be named to the coalition without voting themselves onto it.

Self-hurting is not a townlock on anybody. And btw saying "self-hurt so I know I can work with you" is giving scum a roadmap to how to play you.

And I'm not sure about Nathann yet.

Showing good faith in pavHURT: nathann at pav who do you trust? HEAL: pav I'm showing good faith in you but I'm still asking you not to vote me till your sure you can.

i think i like pav

In post 81, cyrus62 wrote:

In post 80, Pavowski wrote:Just disagree with this. Scum can absolutely hurt themselves. Scum can even be named to the coalition without voting themselves onto it.

Self-hurting is not a townlock on anybody. And btw saying "self-hurt so I know I can work with you" is giving scum a roadmap to how to play you.

And I'm not sure about Nathann yet.

Showing good faith in pavHURT: nathann at pav who do you trust? HEAL: pav I'm showing good faith in you but I'm still asking you not to vote me till your sure you can.

Cyrus could you please direct some of your energy to some of the other players in game. You're stressing me out. And the fact that you're concerned about a single vote, which is purely a signifier right now, makes me think twice about townreading you.

I do not legitimately have anybody at this point. Some of these slots have barely spoken.

Save The Dragons wrote:i think i like pav

Aww, thanks.

I do not trust enchant or feral. I can't shake a nagging feeling that std isn't town.

VOTE: std this is how much I distrust std

In post 65, Nathann wrote:If I had to come up with a Scumread, I think Farren's the closest to it? He gives me a vibe of an analytical player, who right now feels as if he's forcing himself to post and keep up the analytical appearance? But the game isn't exactly full of content, to be fair. Everyone else feels null so far.

I am an analytical player - although the analysis part sometimes resembles throwing everything in a big box labeled SOLUTIONS, shaking it a few times, and seeing what comes out. Especially when deadlines are involved.

The surprising thing is that it works from time to time.

In post 63, cyrus62 wrote:no you're not useing proper logic as town I am willing to keep my self out as a act of good faith why because right now I would think scum was would want either of them in it there is only 7 town 5 day 2 and 3 day 3 if we don't hit scum so scums best actions is to be the 5

Of course, if you're Town and in the Coalition, then that means there's one spot less for scum to occupy. It also means that - if the Coalition fails - you only have to find scum amongst four players instead of amongst five players.

In post 68, Hakai wrote:

In post 51, Farren wrote:cyrus - you come across to me like you're in wheeling-and-dealing mode. Is that where your head is now?

VOTE: Farren

Understanding people is important to figuring out their alignment.

In post 73, cyrus62 wrote:

In post 71, Save The Dragons wrote:you don't trust me? :crying:

Give me a reason hurt your self.

In post 74, Save The Dragons wrote:i'm town so i'm not going to

Would you do it if you were scum? If so, why?

In post 77, Save The Dragons wrote:if i were scum i'd hurt myself to appease you

I'll take this as an answer to my last question.

In post 85, cyrus62 wrote:I do not trust enchant or feral. I can't shake a nagging feeling that std isn't town.

Who the heck is feral?

If that's supposed to be me, . Please spell my name correctly.

In post 92, Farren wrote:

In post 85, cyrus62 wrote:I do not trust enchant or feral. I can't shake a nagging feeling that std isn't town.

Who the heck is feral?

If that's supposed to be me,

please stop

. Please spell my name correctly.

Farren my bad but my actions are pure.

Theres not enough information to get a read on me

In post 51, Farren wrote:cyrus - you come across to me like you're in wheeling-and-dealing mode. Is that where your head is now?

*putting player hat back on*

Also, cyrus, I didn't see you answer this question.

In post 93, cyrus62 wrote:Farren my bad but my actions are pure.

Thank you. That's on a personal, outside-of-the-game level.

In post 94, Save The Dragons wrote:Theres not enough information to get a read on me

Of course there is. The only way there wouldn't would be if you'd literally posted nothing at all since the game started.

heh. That was supposed to be "wouldn't be", not "wouldn't would be."

In post 86, cyrus62 wrote:VOTE: std this is how much I distrust std

Is there anything making you distrust him other than him not wanting to hurt himself?