Mafiascum.net

Nyeh!

scum probably already willingly bring up self-meta with no provocation, jokingly or defensively, more often than town but has that increased recently or am i just now cottoning onto it

In post 76, redtea wrote:scum probably already willingly bring up self-meta with no provocation, jokingly or defensively, more often than town but has that increased recently or am i just now cottoning onto it

I was going to wait and see how much the votes would build up without me saying anything because it would be funny. But uh me not making the sixth post is not actually self-meta. That was satire.

In post 58, MegAzumarill wrote:Since we don't have an Innocent Child I am making myself the honorary Innocent Child. I am now confirmed town.
No need to thank me

Nice try, scum.
VOTE: Azumarill

In post 76, redtea wrote:scum probably already willingly bring up self-meta with no provocation,

O never do that. Check my previous games.

this guy

did I say the self-meta needed to be accurate, or proposed as accurate
no

I'm gonna unvote before this turns into a Thing
UNVOTE:

In post 81, redtea wrote:did I say the self-meta needed to be accurate, or proposed as accurate
no

It wasn't even an actual self-meta though...

In post 78, Egix96 wrote:

In post 58, MegAzumarill wrote:Since we don't have an Innocent Child I am making myself the honorary Innocent Child. I am now confirmed town.
No need to thank me

Nice try, scum.
VOTE: Azumarill

Imagine voting the confirmed innocent

Q: What is the confirmed innocent doing on MS today?? Don't you have.. like.. candles to blow, wishes to make and a cake to eat?

Thought you were asking me at first, then I realized "Q" probably just means "question".

In post 82, redtea wrote:I'm gonna unvote before this turns into a Thing
UNVOTE:

Considering no other things have happened or are happening, I say thing it up. Why is your vote better off the wagon than on it?

mmmm votecount pls?

In post 87, PenguinPower wrote:mmmm votecount pls?

soon

In post 84, MegAzumarill wrote:

In post 78, Egix96 wrote:

In post 58, MegAzumarill wrote:Since we don't have an Innocent Child I am making myself the honorary Innocent Child. I am now confirmed town.
No need to thank me

Nice try, scum.
VOTE: Azumarill

Imagine voting the confirmed innocent

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p11291164
What your post reminded me of.

In post 89, T3 wrote:

Votecount:

• Gamma Emerald (2): Roden, Galron
  Roden (2): numberQ, ssbm_Kyouko
  MegAzumarill (1): Egix96
  Enchant (1): MegAzumarill
  Not_Mafia (1): ssbm_Kyouko

Day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-11-10 07:56:01).
With 13 alive it takes 7 to eliminate.

ssbm_Kyouko is voting twice and you are missing my vote here.

unofficial

Enchant (1): MegAzumarill
Not_Mafia (1): Not_Mafia
Roden (2): NumberQ, ssbm_Kyouko (This was at 4 votes before 78 and 82)
GammaEmerald (3): Roden, Galron, PenguinPower
MegAzumarill (1): Egix96

redtea has unvoted without re-voting
Gamma has posted without votes


pedit: how dare you ninja my vc and make me pedit it

VOTE: Gamma

He said there was nothing important to discuss so let's make something to discuss.

choo choo VOTE: Gamma

ok, sorry, didnt realise game had started, catching up, ty

In post 83, Roden wrote:

In post 81, redtea wrote:did I say the self-meta needed to be accurate, or proposed as accurate
no

It wasn't even an actual self-meta though...

historically people who fail to understand my very clear posts are scum

In post 86, numberQ wrote:

In post 82, redtea wrote:I'm gonna unvote before this turns into a Thing
UNVOTE:

Considering no other things have happened or are happening, I say thing it up. Why is your vote better off the wagon than on it?

I'm trying to be a more selective in my thinging