Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Btw I’m rusty since I haven’t played in 4 months, so bear with me.
No, because I've played with Roden enough to know that this isn’t Rodens towngame.
Roden is also not likely to genuinely make the mistake as town.
Beyond that, the contribution is generically a scum one regardless of the above.
I don’t like the assumption about the kinds of mistakes Roden (or anyone else) can make. I’ve seen intelligent players make mental errors or misread rules all the time.
Not sure about the generic Scum contribution part, but that’s your take so won’t argue with you on that.
I don’t trust arguments based on meta all that much, so that part is not super convincing to me. How many games have you two played together you think?
They're super opinionated and make a lot of assumptions, they're also pretty clumsy with word choice - Bell
Luke, respect for your scumgame has gone up massively - Hectic
In post 17, mastina wrote:Hi y'all, I'm gonna be fully transparent with this:
I am setting my productivity to 0% today.
You may call that anti-town as much as you want; you can consider it suspicious as much as you want. Which is fair. The scum extra kill mechanism is ludicrously strong and I am fully aware of the risks.
But I have very strong reasons for doing so. I promise that by D4, you'll know why.
I won't go 0% more than once.
But for ~reasons~ I need to go 0% today. Let's just say I'll become a scumhunting GOD.
I kinda feel like you should have just done this, and not declared it tbh.
Are you basically claiming that you have a power worth the over all productivity taking a hit?
Conversely, people probably should not declare intent to go to 100% productivity, because that is paramount to claiming either a VT or a PR with a bad ability.
damn mega townie analysis from you on something that's already been done congrats you're at the top of my TRs
This feels like a horrible reason to town read me tbh.
They're super opinionated and make a lot of assumptions, they're also pretty clumsy with word choice - Bell
Luke, respect for your scumgame has gone up massively - Hectic
They're super opinionated and make a lot of assumptions, they're also pretty clumsy with word choice - Bell
Luke, respect for your scumgame has gone up massively - Hectic
They're super opinionated and make a lot of assumptions, they're also pretty clumsy with word choice - Bell
Luke, respect for your scumgame has gone up massively - Hectic
Btw I’m rusty since I haven’t played in 4 months, so bear with me.
No, because I've played with Roden enough to know that this isn’t Rodens towngame.
Roden is also not likely to genuinely make the mistake as town.
Beyond that, the contribution is generically a scum one regardless of the above.
Don't really know how to respond to this. I know you do vibe reads, but you've never scum read me correctly by doing that. Besides, any info you may have on me is outdated and doesn't really apply to my playstyle any more, for various reasons I don't really want to get into right now.
My issue is that you're stubborn and very unlikely to change your reads, and will keep pushing based on your initial vibes. I don't know how to engage with you here.
Also claiming that I don't make mistakes about set up info is just...wrong. I don't know what you think scum!me gains from faking a misinterpretation of the rules.
In post 0, Datisi wrote:but a group of inspectors is not having it. having an obsession with silly things like sanitary violations and humane working conditions, they attempted to get their way in court; but after that had failed, they took the matters into their own hands, vowing to either take the company down from the inside, or get fired trying.
I think mafia might be the good guys in this setup?
In post 17, mastina wrote:Hi y'all, I'm gonna be fully transparent with this:
I am setting my productivity to 0% today.
You may call that anti-town as much as you want; you can consider it suspicious as much as you want. Which is fair. The scum extra kill mechanism is ludicrously strong and I am fully aware of the risks.
But I have very strong reasons for doing so. I promise that by D4, you'll know why.
I won't go 0% more than once.
But for ~reasons~ I need to go 0% today. Let's just say I'll become a scumhunting GOD.
I kinda feel like you should have just done this, and not declared it tbh.
Are you basically claiming that you have a power worth the over all productivity taking a hit?
Conversely, people probably should not declare intent to go to 100% productivity, because that is paramount to claiming either a VT or a PR with a bad ability.
Had the same thought.
As far as Mastina goes it’s just personal meta for Mastina to claim first post that their role is game breaking but they can’t talk about it.
Be prepared for Mastina to talk about it a lot in spite of that but it’s not that alignment indicative.
