Page 31 of 64
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:34 pm
by Nachomamma8
↑ Maenara wrote:You have a scum-read on Trollie? Impressive.
The point is, we all know that Trollie is scummy scum, even if he's not admitting it, so we don't need to lynch him right now. Chk has no reason to lie as town, so either he or Nacho is scum. If we have a vig shoot Trollie, and we lynch Nacho, we've got a 50% to be rid of 3 scum by the time day 3 starts.
↑ Maenara wrote: ↑ buldermar wrote:Well I'm also cool with sheeping Maenara.
Dude. Look at my reads in this game. You'd be better off sheeping our foreign minister, and he doesn't even speak the language.
That aside, I think it's plenty clear which people we oughtn't lynch, and which are fine to lynch, but in case of scum not having realized these, let's not mention them. Go-go quicklynch.
(the second quote is a game where maenara was confirmed town and people told her to talk more.
this is called false bravado)
Vote: Bitmap
i feel good about arc, maestro, matt, om, chk, trollie, voided, and toog as town.
venmar is iffy
rofl, mae are both scumfucks
ton of lurkers
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:35 pm
by Nachomamma8
like peregrineV who is reading this thread!
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:39 pm
by MattP
Trollie is very obviously not town
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:53 pm
by Nachomamma8
no
trollie hides away as scum pretty hard
here, i see none of that
you haven't even put him in panic mode yet
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:02 pm
by MattP
MattP read on Trollie Vs. Nacho read on Trollie
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:02 pm
by MattP
What specifically has Trollie posted that rings town to you?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:07 pm
by Nachomamma8
↑ TheTrollie wrote:ok, thank you all for coming *bows*
[applause]
No, no really I
[more applause...applause grows until it drowns out any noise made by THETROLLIE]
The end.
this addition to the case was basically him throwing out extra confidence in his case to make it stronger so someone would listen to it because no one was before
i liked that
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:09 pm
by Voidedmafia
↑ MattP wrote: ↑ Maestro wrote:Who's confTown? List plox.
Bitmap
Nacho
Trollie
Maenara
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:monkey gave VM 4 non-PR posts so he could get his thoughts out through non-wafla shit, but he gives roflcopter an FoS/Vote only PR? Nope.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:11 pm
by MattP
VM, you know post 743 was facetious right?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:12 pm
by Nachomamma8
↑ MattP wrote:MattP read on Trollie Vs. Nacho read on Trollie
would be a very proud townread, yeah
postgame would be amazing
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:17 pm
by MattP
The fact that you're not voting chk / expressing criticism about him is INCREDIBLY scummy when he's practically claiming he has role related info that you're scum
But 759 was a nice townie thing, gj, I reconsidered my read on you for a sec, you're still scum though
VM, Nacho calling chk a townread is practically a scumclaim
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:22 pm
by Nachomamma8
VoidedMafia wrote:Well, I only need to post photos for my PR... but yeah. Though, if rofl's previous meta involves him lurkering a lot or doing lots of unexplained votes, it makes "some" sense.
interesting. so he's not exactly confirmed scum.
matt, chk doesn't have a guilty on me.
i know this.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:24 pm
by MattP
AND THINGS JUST TOOK A TURN FOR THE MORE INTERESTING
EXPLAIN
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:28 pm
by Voidedmafia
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:29 pm
by Nachomamma8
↑ Maenara wrote:Roflcopter, use your next post to FoS: PeregrineV if you have a posting restriction.
hey rofl
why don't you explain why you've kept up the bullshit PR facade for so long?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:31 pm
by PeregrineV
@Nacho- I see your online- can you give me a quick catchup, or at least highlights?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:31 pm
by Nachomamma8
matt, if chk rolls in and explicitly claims a guilty, then i'll explain
otherwise, there's no need
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:33 pm
by Nachomamma8
↑ PeregrineV wrote:@Nacho- I see your online- can you give me a quick catchup, or at least highlights?
i will give you a quick catchup if you promise not to be a lurkfuck
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:38 pm
by MattP
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:matt, if chk rolls in and explicitly claims a guilty, then i'll explain
otherwise, there's no need
You have to explain before he does because:
A) his role is obv more important
B) You should be locked into a claim over him so you cant tailor your claim
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:41 pm
by PeregrineV
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote: ↑ PeregrineV wrote:@Nacho- I see your online- can you give me a quick catchup, or at least highlights?
i will give you a quick catchup if you promise not to be a lurkfuck
Game started Wednesday and day1 ended Thursday. New day started yesterday. Weekends are bad for me.
You got anything useful?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:42 pm
by PeregrineV
↑ MattP wrote: ↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:matt, if chk rolls in and explicitly claims a guilty, then i'll explain
otherwise, there's no need
You have to explain before he does because:
A) his role is obv more important
B) You should be locked into a claim over him so you cant tailor your claim
Matt, If you're on right now, can you give a quick catchup/highlight?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 10:51 pm
by Nachomamma8
↑ MattP wrote:A) his role is obv more important
B) You should be locked into a claim over him so you cant tailor your claim
i know that he is lying for another reason that has nothing to do with my role
i'm not asking him to claim. all he has to say is "yes. i am claiming investigative role."
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:01 pm
by Nachomamma8
↑ PeregrineV wrote: ↑ MattP wrote: ↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:matt, if chk rolls in and explicitly claims a guilty, then i'll explain
otherwise, there's no need
You have to explain before he does because:
A) his role is obv more important
B) You should be locked into a claim over him so you cant tailor your claim
Matt, If you're on right now, can you give a quick catchup/highlight?
actually catch up should be really easy
mattp called medhi scum
medhi was scum
bitmap is survivor third party and om gets powers if he lynches anti-town players twice in a row
so bitmap is a pretty solid play for today
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:01 pm
by PeregrineV
Ok, if I get it, Matt is lightning rod, Bitmap Survivor, chk claiming Nacho-scum, Om claiming lynch-2-scum-for-great-goodness, Matt part-time conditional multi-shot ultra-vig.
Did I miss anything?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:03 pm
by Nachomamma8
nope 10/10
