Posted: Fri May 31, 2013 2:25 pm
Hi everyone. I've been keeping up, but waiting for eye pain to get better a little so I can pull through and make some posts. That's on me. :/
I'll try after breakfast.
I'll try after breakfast.
It's 10:49 AM. I'm done with breakfast now. Why is NS 25% not scum?In post 751, TheIrishPope wrote:Breakfast at 9 PM?
Silly timezones
Bert, all I have to tell you is Wisdom is scum and NS is 75% scum
I write this with the greatest civility I can muster. For all I know, you could be scum, and you could have picked a hydra to be the gunbearer so that you could frame Kerberos the other hydra, killing two birds/hydras with one stone.In post 659, TheIrishPope wrote:No, I am including the fact that scum chose a hydra to be the gunbearer for one reason only: hydra dissonance. Gives scum more chance to survive.
And they couldn't choose Kerberos because, you know, scum.
Point out where my logic is flawed.
You are right! It has nothing to do with what they've done ingame. I'm still right though.
PEdit: Yes Mara, that was my case. Why else would they choose Oil?
Second PEdit: Every hydra argues.
In post 671, Wisdom wrote:One of them may be, most likely Jacob. Need to hear more from them.
Why is bork town?
I think the key word Wisdom can see in your post is "seems to." Will you do us a favor and tell us what new points he brought in that were overlooked?In post 673, notscience wrote:He seems to be actively scumhunting and bringing in new points that were overlooked.
Why do you think he's scum?
I agree. It's getting on my nerves. I got a chance to skim through the Cult game he recently finished with Arcangel. I can sense her frustration with what happened in that game. Initially, I ruled TIP as null/leaning town based on his excessive, overbearing tunneling sensational type posting. I don't trust what I think, and I hate how I can't reach a decision on him. I'm confused, and I don't think what he's doing is pro-town at all. He has me fooled if he's town, but the same can be said if he's scum. Please don't call me out for posting fluff for this because this is my thought process. I mean, why spam so much...it doesn't even help the game in general, then I/we have to weed through more posts and look for scummy tells...it makes looking through TIP's posts for content like looking for a needle in a haystack. Sorry, frustrated here too. Darn it. Okay, moving on.In post 734, notscience wrote:Why is TIP constantly trying to be a kiss-up?
In post 665, TheIrishPope wrote:So you people are convinced I'm scum because I am scumhunting.
Seems legit.
Anyway, talk to Oil
I really liked 666. Something about it felt genuine.In post 666, Wisdom wrote:Funny you're focusing on that of all things in the conversation.
Caught scum, methinks.
In post 492, Kerberos wrote: You aren't taking a stance though which is odd because I have seen town wisdom take stances early on in the game. I am scum reading you for calling people out for Anti-town over scummy actions and for leeching off of other peoples reasons when making your arguments. The only thing that was your own was your little argument with Fege and starting up the conversation with me. Nothing you are doing reminds me of town Wisdom in the slightest
Looking back, I looked at cases made against you, Wisdom. Honestly, if the three heads is scum, then this case/meta makes sense for them to make so that they make can be putting dirt on you early so that you don't bleed obvtown down the stretch towards the end of the game. It's like a political commercial sorta. This is my total BS commenting at this point but honestly I have a headache and I need to stay active so what the hell I'm posting whatever I think because I'm grumpy and cornball emotional. You always sound so damn paranoid that it irked me without me realizing why. I'm trying to get used to it.In post 493, Wisdom wrote:Except there's no such thing as town Wisdom; I'm tired of hearing things like that.
I had a feeling that there were scum partaking in an argument on 28 but I couldn't tell who when I saw those pages too. My gut still says Angel is being so damn defensive and it just looked so fake the way she was trying to instigate reactions. Is this her playstyle? I don't know her, and no I'm not using "not knowing her" as an excuse. I think it's just that Angel was SOOOOOO defensive. I mean, why so defensive when entering the game. OK I have not played with you before, but that was like so over-defensive. I mean, I thought Bork was pretty defensive, but you were more so and I was flabbergasted. Angel, it seems like you pulling I mean manafacturing cases out of your mind and some things you said made sense and some things you said didn't. You'll ask me what things made sense and what didn't. When you ask me that, I will go look back, your asking me will motivate me to look back. So ask away whatever you want to ask so I get off my lazy buttocks. But I will tell you I really like the point about Kerb and Bork and how people might rush to look at small contexts sometimes too soon, to his/her detriment. But moving forward, what really bothered me was:
Why wouldn't you just say that's scummy? It just suggested that you didn't want to say directly that Wisdom is scum to you, and in my own wack wild world Wisdom is town to you. I hate myself for thinking this. I really do. I'm leaning scum on you. You brought new points to the table, I give you credit for that, but I still don't like the tone and feeling I get from your posts. Just way too defensive and not genuine feeling to me. Sorry if that makes no sense.In post 697, ArcAngel9 wrote:Your unwillingness to give town reads!! that's anti-town. therefore, makes you most possible scum.In post 695, Wisdom wrote:And that makes me scum because?
In post 725, don_johnson wrote:a) i said: wisdom thinks jacob is scum.
b) wisdom says: you are not reading.
statement was actually correct, but you decided to try and make it sound as if statement a was not correct.
seeing as how you bolded your vote for jacob and have implied all game that your suspicion of jacob was serious, i kind of assume you would continue to bold your "vote".
p-edit:
who would you shoot first?
In post 726, Wisdom wrote: I'd shoot bork if I had the gun right now.
Why did you have to wait for Wisdom to say who he wanted to shoot, and then when you have to think a while before telling everyone else to shoot Bork? That bothers me. I'm leaning scum on you still, even if your posts make me laugh sometimes lol. But wait, there's more!!! (DING DING DING)
In post 573, borkjerfkin wrote:Also I like the majority of your reads so that's ++ for you too
Don, what were you talking about with this "nice omgus" comment? I felt Bork's reply to me when I gauged his handle on me as sort of appeasing (not sure what to make of it), but nothing more than that?
i'm a numbers guy. i scumhunt early by thinning the herd, dividing players into smaller groupings, etc. i am not a conventional player i guess. the list is the group i find most likely to hit scum. fact is, scummy players are town and townie players can be scum. at some point you have to cut through all the white noise and start killing. i play fast. i prefer games that are under 40 pages, day 1 and 2 speed lynches, random vig shots, pina colada's and long walks on the beach. picture it in real life, we are all standing around talking and someone hands don_johnson a gun. he's probably drunk and just starts waving it around, settles on the a small group of people and then POW! he fires into the group and caps somebody in the ass. then we check his wallet.kerb wrote:Also I don't like how your reads are barely changing, but also half the other player list are they all leaning town or they null or what? I think you're just bullshiting your lists.
internet=america. not my problem.kerb wrote:Oh and your comments to AA were uncalled for. She's not English as her first language. You need to get over that and stop being a pissant.
And you felt the need to post this because?
5 pages behind....In post 770, JacobSavage wrote:I'm also about 5 pages behind...
Wisdom, we have 3 of the 4. Now, who's the last?In post 771, Oil Tycoons wrote:5 pages behind....In post 770, JacobSavage wrote:I'm also about 5 pages behind...
So, you HAVE been active lurking. Excellent. Thanks for confirming scum.