Mini 1,573: How Do You Want to Die? (Game over!)

Antihero · Post Post #750 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 2:21 am

In post 748, HighShroomish wrote:Anti- please explain how my inaction was "calculated"

well, you have a decent number of posts (16), but you've refused to actually do anything in any of them.
VOTE: Shroomish

also, you're not going to unvote the mason claim?

goodmorning, you need to stop sitting on your haunches and make a move.

goodmorning · Post Post #751 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 3:14 am

I like to watch.

More importantly, I'm trying to sort you/Titus. I don't really see that happening today though.

VOTE: SSK

Snork · Post Post #752 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 3:42 am

Ika/pants - quote and show crumbs please.

Snork · Post Post #753 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:09 am

Also, this game is now 30 pages long and Kitoari only has 1 post. That's not right. Can we please get an immediate replacement?

Snork · Post Post #754 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:10 am

I am currently reworking wagon analysis. Will return with that later.

HighShroomish · Post Post #755 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:21 am

In post 750, Antihero wrote:
In post 748, HighShroomish wrote:Anti- please explain how my inaction was "calculated"
well, you have a decent number of posts (16), but you've refused to actually do anything in any of them.
VOTE: Shroomish

also, you're not going to unvote the mason claim?

goodmorning, you need to stop sitting on your haunches and make a move.

Really? I have just been twiddling my thumbs when I'm asking you questions? Saying I have a decent number of posts directly contradicts your statement about "calculated inaction." Pick one. And don't act like I'm not doing anything, cause I am.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: ANTI
Now I will.

Snork · Post Post #756 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:27 am

First look points to SSK with huge flashing red signs. Secondary options would be in {Shroomish, BE, Kitoari, Anti} with varying degrees of strength. Anti vote jumping makes me wary and I should examine his ISO a bit closer. I don't want to let go of my strongest town read there.

I absolutely need the Kitoari slot sorted. It is unacceptable that a person has been allowed to occupy a slot while not actually playing. Blacklisted forever, that's for sure.

Would like to see a current vote count before I vote, but it will be SSK.

Antihero · Post Post #757 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:31 am

In post 755, HighShroomish wrote:Really? I have just been twiddling my thumbs when I'm asking you questions? Saying I have a decent number of posts directly contradicts your statement about "calculated inaction." Pick one. And don't act like I'm not doing anything, cause I am.

no it doesn't.
post number =/= doing something

Titus · Post Post #758 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:41 am

Mod: I am willing to take on one additional game to get this one filled.

I will be back later...Shroomish's vote...I think scum are having trouble determining who to bus.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #759 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:00 am

VOTE COUNT

Antihero (3): Titus, MafiaSSK, HighShroomish
HighShroomish (2): ika, Dr Pants, Antihero
MafiaSSK (1): goodmorning
ika (2): Burning_Earth, bubbajack8
Not voting (2): Kitoari, Snork

With

11

players alive, it takes

6

votes to lynch a player.

Day 2 ends in (expired on 2014-06-07 18:25:24).

In post 739, Burning_Earth wrote:
Unvote

In post 740, Burning_Earth wrote:
Vote SSK
for doing nothing.

Use the correct format, please.

In post 753, Snork wrote:
Also, this game is now 30 pages long and Kitoari only has 1 post. That's not right. Can we please get an immediate replacement?

I'm trying.

In post 758, Titus wrote:
Mod: I am willing to take on one additional game to get this one filled.

Noted.

HighShroomish · Post Post #760 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:14 am

In post 757, Antihero wrote:
In post 755, HighShroomish wrote:Really? I have just been twiddling my thumbs when I'm asking you questions? Saying I have a decent number of posts directly contradicts your statement about "calculated inaction." Pick one. And don't act like I'm not doing anything, cause I am.
no it doesn't.
post number =/= doing something

Astute observation. Very good.

But I never said anything about post number corralating with doing something. You said I have a decent number of posts. You also said that my inaction was calculated. Having a decent number of posts =! calculated inaction. Which is it? And again, why is my inaction "calculated?"

Snork · Post Post #761 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:16 am

VOTE: MafiaSSK

Antihero · Post Post #762 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:25 am

In post 760, HighShroomish wrote:Having a decent number of posts =! calculated inaction.

not true

Antihero · Post Post #763 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:26 am

what i'm talking about: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=17461

HighShroomish · Post Post #764 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:35 am

And what about that? Am I doing anything that that guide says to do? If I am, quote it, and say which point it corralates to and why

Answer. My. Question.

Antihero · Post Post #765 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:45 am

no, you don't get to show up at the last second and nitpick

you quote something that you have done that advanced the game state.

HighShroomish · Post Post #766 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:48 am

I don't need to quote anything. I'm advancing the gamestate right now. On this page. And if you were worried about me "showing up at the last second and nitpicking" then why didn't you say something about it sooner?

AND ANSWER MY FUCKING QUESTION.

Antihero · Post Post #767 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:56 am

here's your ISO

In post 8, HighShroomish wrote:
VOTE: GOODMORNING

Your name itself is subconsciously buddying everyone. It makes people less likely to want to vote you because you greet them so kindly, but I won't be falling for your schemes!

And because it's night where I live. So yeah.

nothing

In post 60, HighShroomish wrote:Woo this is why I hat finals.

VOTE: REINOE

I'm going with the exact opposite of my gut because my gut has been drastically wrong for the past three games.

To answer reinoes RQS(the second one, I must've missed the first.

No clue.

No clue.

No clue.

And you can stop with the RQS now.

nothing

In post 63, HighShroomish wrote:
In post 62, reinoe wrote:
In post 61, reinoe wrote:
Dr Pants wrote:actually scum is probably reinoe, the fact that he's using soft meta to name drop policy lynches is pretty bad
Haha, I felt the same way when you used probability to claim you weren't scum this game.
EBWOP, OH YOU DIDN'T DO THAT. Never wake up and go straight to the computer. Walk around first to get your head on straight.
This is a very good idea. I probably should've done that before statuing to do stuff here...
NOT reinoes RQS, ika's RQS. Fuck finals week.

nothing

In post 89, HighShroomish wrote:FYI I'm just gonna be floating around for most of this until finals are over(a week from today) but I'll be *active*

ika, I think we're done with the RQS. Why do you want people to ask(seemingly) random questions?

nothing

In post 93, HighShroomish wrote:
In post 91, Dr Pants wrote:high shroomish are you scum?
I'm a Randomized JOAT along with an even Night Doc and Odd Night Amnesiac Seer with a One-Shot Suicidal Dayvig that can be used only in LYLO.

nothing

In post 95, HighShroomish wrote:
In post 94, Dr Pants wrote:oh you're an ass. its ok im often an ass too
You think I'm kidding, don't you.

Good because then I would've had to try this-
If you say Gullible really slowly it sounds like oranges.

nothing

In post 97, HighShroomish wrote:
In post 96, Dr Pants wrote:well you should protect me on even nights then, ill bake you cookies
Do you make brownies?

nothing

In post 310, HighShroomish wrote:Will make a post when I get home.

nothing

In post 321, HighShroomish wrote:
@MOD- Are you sure it only takes three votes to lynch?

Well what did you think I was gonna do, B_E? That was highly unnecessary. Fucking opportunistic of you.
Pants is grasping at straws that aren't even there.
Titus' entry to today was weird as fuck to me.
Ika is pinging in every possibly way for me.
VOTE: IKA

oh look, reads

thaaaaaat are incomplete and poorly explained
nothing

In post 325, HighShroomish wrote:Damn I forgot sarcasm doesn't translate well on the internet.

But I had just said that I was going to make a post when I got home... It's only four posts above your 315...

nothing

In post 380, HighShroomish wrote:@ika
Your continual push for RQS at the beginning
You say you have a plan, tell everyone just to know that you have a plan, and expect us to trust you, and I just caught your "crumb".
Your post seem to have a "superiority" attitude.
Titus' entry was weird, but he has good reasoning for voting which I like.

Why was Titus' entry weird as fuck? Person who said I was going off gut and some other shit- Yeah, this was gut. It felt weird. My gut is either spot on, or way off. I'm thinking it's 100% accurate.

limited commentary on ika, plus it seems like you just explain to us why we should like ika, not why ika is scum.
...and the flip-floppy Titus read gets smokescreened behind "gut".

In post 443, HighShroomish wrote:Girls, you're all pretty.

Bubba is town, and Anti stop fucking misrepping people. I for one am not gonna vote every single person I say might be scum, and I doubt most people would. He also never said Pants was a town read. And if you want to get into semantics, he had Pants as (not scum=town) town in that first post and he said the same thing about pants (didn't see him as scum=town) in the second post.

*sigh* Why must multiple people in one game be grasping at nothing?

"girls, you're all pretty"?
ha, sorry, you don't get townpoints for playing "peacemaker". and you take a swipe at something i said, but fail to comment on anything happening overall or how it affects your reads.

nothing.

In post 639, HighShroomish wrote:Well hello.

VOTE: SNORK
your page 20 was bad and I need to make a post that isn't a prod dodge.

and now you show up at the 11th hour.

the rest of your ISO is you being absolutely apoplectic at how anyone could think you're scum.

does that answer your question? or are you just going to go on with this bullshit lieutenant kaffee-shtick charade?

Antihero · Post Post #768 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:58 am

see in the above quote stripes, there are plenty of

words

. however, the reads that are there either don't end up going anywhere or are stupid as shit (namely, the snork one).

does that answer your question?

HighShroomish · Post Post #769 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 6:12 am

Are you sure I'm not trying to figure out WHY people think I'm scum? Because that's what I did. The only reasoning that I've questioned is yours. Because it's crap. I'm not being apoplectic. I'm tearing at shit reasoning. Also, I "showed up at the 11th hour" because I forgot this game existed until I was prodded.

Limited commentary on ika? Oh shit that's horrible! I only gave reasoning! And why would any of that make you like him?

And now why don't you answer the other question I asked you- why did you just now point out that I got here late? Why are you avoiding answering my questions at all?

p-edit: those aren't fucking reads. They're comments, minus ika. Which was explained later.
And you failed to see the part where I said I had only read up to page 20, didn't you.
Now tell me where my posts corralate to the guide you linked.

Antihero · Post Post #770 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 6:16 am

In post 769, HighShroomish wrote:p-edit: those aren't fucking reads. They're comments, minus ika. Which was explained later.
And you failed to see the part where I said I had only read up to page 20, didn't you.
Now tell me where my posts corralate to the guide you linked.

right
comments that didn't do anything except pad your ISO

and the article wasn't meant to be anything except for where i adapted the language "calculated inaction" from. but please, keep nitpicking.

HighShroomish · Post Post #771 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 6:27 am

So your not saying what the guide said and what I did corralate and you created a new definition for something when a definition already exsists. Good to know.

Okay, so if I don't comment on stuff I'm scum, and if I do comment, I'm scum. Gotcha.

And can you please answer my questions when I ask them instead of avoiding them until I put on caps lock?

Dr Pants · Post Post #772 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:15 am

@ GM: I'm not an alt, I accidentally posted with my hydra account

@ Snork: I'll let Ika post his, apart from all the "plan" stuff we were letting on my biggest hint was here:

In post 157, Dr Pants wrote:
In post 154, reinoe wrote:
In post 153, Dr Pants wrote:that plus reinoes "once I flip town Good Morning is confirmed town".
Everyone you're suspicious of is conftown. So feel free to add Anti-hero to that list.
I bus quite a bit in my scum game. You know this. So unless you are a Mason with Good Morning or Anti-hero, then you shouldn't assume they are conf-town.

In post 162, Dr Pants wrote:is that a Mason claim?

In my eagerness to lynch Reinoe I tried to get him to claim mason :p

I also copied what Ika was saying:

In post 581, Dr Pants wrote: I'll give you a hint: I have a scheme going on right now. trust me when I tell you that I am not getting lynched. maybe I'll claim at l-2 as well...

Snork · Post Post #773 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:32 am

You waited nearly 200 posts before crumbing?

Dr Pants · Post Post #774 (ISO) » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:45 am

as a mason, you become more and more effective the longer you stay in the game, kinda like an IC. think of it this way, if people find out your a mason day 1, then you have 2 people out of 13 who are IC'd. Day 2, its 2 out of 11. Day 3, its 2 out of 9. So waiting to crumb is the thing to do, tbh I probably shouldn't have even crumbed day 1 at all.