Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 4:56 am
Relax im kidding
i havent caugh tup properly, huge chuinks of the thread missing.
i hear ya, but i lik eit because there is that decent chance of hitting scum. Scum do like to lurk. Not all of them, but i bet at least one of them is in the smaller amount of posts.In post 755, sheepsaysmeep wrote:players
yes, for on ce i am one of the lower posters. its been a busy few days. however, i just picked the bottom 3 players, the hard core lurkers.In post 754, humaneatingmonkey wrote:And you. And Sergtacos. Why did you miss them? Can you towntell now?
no, i'm town. i agree with you abotu the BUj wagon, i didnt like the fact tha t you and Hopkirk were on it. before you get cross, for the record i think hopkirk is much scummy than you.In post 758, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Now Moz is scumming it up too smh
I don't like how BuJ's wagon is supported and populated by my top scumreads and my recent scumleans. It throws me off so much.
I don't like how Sergtacos adds a vote to "add pressure" where there's already a lot of pressure.
I don't like how Moz is playing right now, and 'lynch all lurkers' is something I have observed scum does in D1 in my recent games. I could be wrong but Moz is still not in tiptop shape imo.
I have a fat list of scumreads right now. I need help. @Kat
There's at least two troll players in the game + the whole reaction test debacleIn post 752, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Flubb, why do you feel that it's a game that's lax about derphammers and quickhammers?
post like this make me townlean human now.
THIS IS EQUIVOCATION< FENCE SITTING< it doesnt say anything!In post 315, BuJaber wrote:Kat and Hop: I'm gonna be honest here, if I were to fully understand what just happened in the last few pages I will need several rereads. It is all over the place. It hurt my head reading it. So look, I will if I have to, but do I need to? I think the summaries you guys posted make a bit more sense, but they don't align. So the real question I'm asking here is do you both agree that you misunderstood each other, or does one of you think the other is twisting facts?
I can see HEM's case (with regards to HEM's own posts) on Hop making sense. But the Kat/Hop interaction is messier.
Also while I totally see HEM's point of view, I am not sure Hop was doing it intentionally. Him not liking the flubb wagon is more AI imo.
I've been playing around with the theory that flubb's wagon could be entirely town. It felt unnatural and exceptionally quick, and regardless of whether all voters are doing it for the same reason or not, the intention behind it seems to be to get out of RVS and get a wagon going, which means if flubb is town scum would probably be a little nervous joining in a wagon that could be quickhammered plus they could just sit back and watch town mislynch for them. If this is true it makes Hop look significantly worse. However serg being on the wagon complicates matters. Like my initial read of serg was obv scum. But when I saw people TR'ing him I thought it might just be a personality thing. Especially when players who've stated or implied having played with him are claiming he's always difficult to read.
UNVOTE:
for the record, i dont get the obsession with pagetops, who gives a fuck lolIn post 323, northsidegal wrote:-
when backreading it helps me a lot since I always know where the vc is and get an idea of what’s happeningmozamis wrote:for the record, i dont get the obsession with pagetops, who gives a fuck lolIn post 323, northsidegal wrote:-
seph in lieu of n_m or just there and that’s where I’m atIn post 768, sheepsaysmeep wrote:townblock of kat, hem, moz, nm
it's a fair point, i am catching up- as you can see- and he is defintely a weaker read than those other town reads.In post 767, Katyusha wrote:moz i’m still missing why you townread flub
i think monkey is TOO aggro to be scum. yeah i know, it has been done, it CAN be done. But it's quite rare.In post 393, Flubbernugget wrote:Comment on my scum reads assholes