Mafiascum.net

In post 752, popsofctown wrote:I'm getting ready for my burger date

In post 750, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i really like tse's entrance into the thread in terms of confidence/how immediately they start solving

In post 755, NaCl wrote:

In post 750, sheepsaysmeep wrote:i really like tse's entrance into the thread in terms of confidence/how immediately they start solving

And you're not going to comment on the fact that he's both townreading and scumreading your slot?

Also, VOTE: TSE

I agree with his thing about the 1 scum in the neighbourhood (leaning towards pops), but I think it's really obvious that that is likely.

Also, I don't agree with most of his reads, mostly unwnd. I just don't see why that jumps out to him as scummy. Also, what has made you think pine is town, TSE? Same for dunnstral, really.

I do agree with the fact that TSE feels too certain on his reads, but it's more that it's relative to the evidence. Like the cases on sheep and unwnd feel really weak, and not explaining townreads is also pretty suspicious. Plus it makes the LA slot higher info.


Also thanks for voting me again and not making a case, pops.

In post 751, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Wow pops has been online.
Wonder what here’s been doing with his time.

Spoiler:

Pops: You man we need to either lynch or kill TSE tonight he’s too good!
Unwnd: Yeah I’m down, let’s hope Town forgets his scum Reads and thoughts.
Mafia 3: Yeah exactly! Don’t worry, later on during today I’ll help you push him
Pops: Thank you BB
Mafia 3: NP.
Unwnd: Yeah if we would have killed him, we would be next to the chopping block.
Mafia 3: Yeah LOL.

In post 746, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 735, tris wrote:

In post 728, TrueSoulEnergy wrote: Scum Lynch Pool:
Unwnd
First of all I didn’t like their first post.
Seems opportunistic despite it being just a picture and it seemed out of place for an entry post.

In post 146, unwnd wrote:I don't know why everyone is dealing in absolutes so soon, the conversation being had just reads like two players convinced by conjecture instead of prior evidence. Pops is acting strange surely but in a position where Pop's strangeness alludes to scum she'd just be giving us more information than I gather she would want to. This is a partial meta read

This could be trying to protect a buddy.

what kind of case is this? was there supposed to be more here?

sure i'll join this VOTE: TSE

Lol more here?
Pops case on me was “Play Terrible”
Which barley is EVER alignment indicative.
I play mafia so much that usually nothing flys past me.
I’ve also played long enough to know that some players play scummy. (Such as Suji)
That’s called a Weak Town.
I’ve dealt with it plenty of times before.

And you want more?
First off all the opening was a weird ass pop in responding to BB.
And I say “this could be protecting a buddy” never stating Pops name.
Then Pop goes “Oh TSE is scummy, Bad Reads /Vote TSE”
Which makes me feel that Unwnd Flipping Mafia gives a high possibility that Pops dose as well.
IDK the fact that pops immediately switched from Suji to Me as soon as that post occurred, felt off.
Like mafia needed to get rid of me and hope that the Town doesn’t remember what I posted and if they do to forget about it so Unwnd and Pops doesn’t get lynched.

In post 747, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 743, popsofctown wrote:Sujimichislot is more likely than rand to flip scum imo. But Creature has a reputation for readability so it seems unwise to lynch there compared to a less readable slot.

Unwnd has been creepy resonant once or twice, and seems to be trying to sort. It's also virtually impossible he gives a care about his assassin target taking his play as a whole, and that bit of information points town.

I don't think he's locktown, I look forward to getting even more to work with in later days. His posts are a lot more interesting to try to follow along with when I don't know if he's town.

Wait so your saying that he doesn’t care to get his target lynched?
This means two things to easily still point him scum:
1) he’s lying about his target
Or
2) since he’s mafia he can just let Mafia buff up and try to pocket his target instead of lynching them.

In post 748, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 744, popsofctown wrote:TSE you are frequently very certain about things.
And there's only one alignment that tends to feel that way.
Not about a requirement that

the word "probably" get sprinkled across every post

, but rather actually

following your thoughts treats certain ideas as cornerstones immediately and that's not town

It’s called “not wanting to miss Lynch town”
Ever tried it?
Yes I’m very considered!
I refuse to allow any mafia to control the game.
I refuse to allow multiple miss lynches to occur.
What’s wrong with going through with my reads? (Highlighted)
What’s wrong with saying the same word over again? Or why even mention it? (Highlighted)

In post 749, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:I think I froze Pops.
Your Welcome Town.

In post 758, sheepsaysmeep wrote:sheep, nacl, pops, tse
dunn, gif
--abu, unwnd, shadoweh
dns, bit, tris, creat

never going to adjust my reads based on the neighborhood sorry

In post 761, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Neighbour*

In post 762, NaCl wrote:@TSE
Because pops had a weird chainsaw defense of LA that involved calling my case bad, ignoring LA's scummy points, and then proceeding to vanity wagon me on and off without ever putting a case on me.

And you realize that pine and sheep are the same slot, right?

In post 690, Definitely Not Scum wrote:I’m liking sheepy for town.

VOTE: Sugimichi

- OS

In post 765, unwnd wrote:

In post 690, Definitely Not Scum wrote:I’m liking sheepy for town.

VOTE: Sugimichi

- OS

I was just about to commend you for your quotewall wrt Bitbringer and then you change your vote like this

What purpose did it serve anyways? There was nothing that seemed like Bitbringer was a dying wagon

In post 758, sheepsaysmeep wrote:sheep, nacl, pops, tse
dunn, gif
--abu, unwnd, shadoweh
dns, bit, tris, creat

never going to adjust my reads based on the neighborhood sorry

In post 579, bitbringer wrote:

In post 578, unwnd wrote:I know you said you were on Weh cause you had nothing but what does mean for your read on her? I don't entirely disagree with your vote on DNS, I just wonder where ['struggling to get into the game] turns into VOTE:

u realize there are two personalities playing this game, right?

-fire

In post 770, unwnd wrote:VOTE: Bitbringer

Just to prove the wagon is far from dead

In post 765, unwnd wrote:

In post 690, Definitely Not Scum wrote:I’m liking sheepy for town.

VOTE: Sugimichi

- OS

I was just about to commend you for your quotewall wrt Bitbringer and then you change your vote like this

What purpose did it serve anyways? There was nothing that seemed like Bitbringer was a dying wagon