Posted: Thu May 07, 2020 7:22 am
I think its the exact opposite and he's a bit too aware actuallyIn post 452, Flavor Leaf wrote:Note to self, Hoctac is extremely not self aware.
I think its the exact opposite and he's a bit too aware actuallyIn post 452, Flavor Leaf wrote:Note to self, Hoctac is extremely not self aware.
sure manIn post 748, Tchill13 wrote:@nero would you consider my early game actual scum hunting opposed to farside's?
The real question is if she did it because she knows me and Auro might be expecting the same silly start as double mafiaIn post 463, davesaz wrote:I feel like mastina's reads are mostly made up, and the stated level of seriousness is a lie.
I don't know yet if it's AI.
You seem to be ignoring me, farside. You sure all of my posts were nonsense?In post 722, farside22 wrote:I'm seeing a lot of nonsense that I can't relate anything too.
People thinknig fence-sitting is bad are usually champions of making terrible arguments.In post 472, davesaz wrote:Many people would see such behavior as "fence sitting".In post 60, Vecna wrote:you realized it was something scum often do early, but then added some relativism by seeing how town would also do it.
I heartily approve of nuance in posting. "Scum would often do X but sometimes town does X too" isnotfence sitting, it's giving useful nuance by shading it like 75% gray instead of black. Calling that fence sitting is lazy at least, and disingenuous scum at times.
Bottom line I think the quote is fine, and it's a good reason to give someone town points. (in this case Vecna giving Nero points IIRC)
Whoops, typo, corrected now.
Nero, why is your memory of me so poor. Trying to get serious reads from the first few pages is something I will always try. Its by far the best place to get accurate game-long reads for me in a lot of situations.In post 479, Nero Cain wrote:just your read on him. I'm a little worried that he was buddying me and he's town reading me for the first time ever. He say's he normally treats me like that but I just don't really remember that and I'm too lazy to look.In post 474, davesaz wrote:Was there anything in particular you're interested in?
Shouldn't that be a reason to suspect him a bit?In post 474, davesaz wrote:Generally Vecna seems more reasonable than what I expect from the first 3-4 page-downs in iso,
yes but you had already played with me twice, once as each alignment and that did nothing for you. Why does Mastina's town read finally get you to budge?In post 753, Auro wrote:Difference being it's Mastina, and I now have experience that informs me.
This alt mix thing clearly has too low a volume of JJD in it. Entertain me some A50. cmon nowIn post 491, 50 Judge Powers wrote:You should be a constant not a variable to yourself, unless you are expecting your alignment to be switched during the course of the day. I mean, play according to your current alignment and eat the rope already.In post 383, Saudade wrote:No i am also a variable in itself because I interact with the other 20 variables
Also, regarding your signature.. so you mean Ultravox' Vienna (which is actually a girl's name) or Falco's Vienna (calling) which is the capital of Austria??
I agree with you but my post said absolutely nothing about what you re talking about.In post 760, Vecna wrote:Trying to get serious reads from the first few pages is something I will always try. Its by far the best place to get accurate game-long reads for me in a lot of situations.
Truth be told, I find it extremely entertaining.In post 762, Tchill13 wrote:Kind of an arrogance
Id have been very suspicious of mastina if she wasnt scumreading you.In post 492, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Even as scum, I don't fake feelings. I feel what I feel, and you of all people should know better than to post this. You have even said in other games where you were actually town, that my emotions are NAI, so now suddenly it is? BS. This is how I know you're scum. When you try to twist what you know of my meta in order to convince people who don't that what you're saying is correct when you know it isn't. << That's the kind of shit that makes me angry.In post 485, mastina wrote:I know ETL AtEs as both alignments and her AtE this game didn't feel town at all; it felt particularly 'fake', for lack of a better word--maybe overblown would be better? In that I have little doubts ETL felt emotions, but her posting here felt like it was overplaying them, for lack of better terminology. Forcing the feelings, I guess you could say.
This was a fat juicy pitch over the plate and it wasn't swung on. I'm disappointed.In post 748, Tchill13 wrote:@nero would you consider my early game actual scum hunting opposed to farside's?
I liked farside mainly due to the questions early game. If farside thinks they were hollow im not sure if I should have liked farside that much for them.
Wait, how so? What exactly are you talking about?In post 768, Vecna wrote:Your play is a textbook playstyle that town mastina will scumread. Especially after the things you did this game.
Did we think that though? Im pretty sure neither me nor Auro actually thought soIn post 497, Elements wrote:this is blatantly not true or not so many people would think you're scum no?In post 495, mastina wrote: This has been, by far, one of the most obvtown games of mine all year; I literally never get more obviously town than I am this game.
I didn't really get this vibe but w/e. I mean, in double you did keep sitting there ans saying that you needed NSG to game solve (but iit was me that did so) so maybe this whole thing w/ mastina isn't outside of your town game.In post 763, Auro wrote:I recall keeping you at "meh, fine, town" in Doubles, no?
Is it just me or do the attempts at humor/semi-trolling from this account feel forced and not very natural? Or is it just because its nowhere near funny?In post 509, Null Vote wrote:Sorry, no one here knows the 5G conspiracy. I have already tested it.