Mafiascum.net

Weird because you don't understand the wagon or weird because it was scum driven in your eyes?

Blake I'm finally getting Skitter to make some solid stances just wait a moment.

sigh

I'm 10 pages behind, will catch up shortly

Also, taking weird stances is towny, but I don't even think I have taken any. Which of my reads do you think is weird?

In post 753, MariaR wrote:Blake I'm finally getting Skitter to make some solid stances just wait a moment.

UNVOTE: Skitter30

Okay.

In post 749, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 748, skitter30 wrote:- feels more distant than i think town!him would be

Based on what?

pyp

In post 751, MariaR wrote:Weird because you don't understand the wagon or weird because it was scum driven in your eyes?

weird because i don't udnerstand the wagon so it makes me question if it's scum driven
but then ss started shading the people opposing the wagon which i thought was strange

You saying you're aware of the gamestate is even more concerning than if you told me 'yeah I'm a bit confused right now.' Because you haven't explained why I'm scum. Well, you quoted a post and said 'that's why I'm voting her' but anyone can do that. You say you don't get the gobble wagon after responding to a quote where me and Bingle both cased him. So I know you didn't miss it. To me it feels like you're just making up being clueless to not get on the gobble wagon.

In post 752, Blake Belladonna wrote:VOTE: Skitter30

yeah you're going to have to elaborate

In post 744, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 731, Firebringer wrote:okay but who.
theres me, skitter, and blake who didn't like the wagon.

Who what?

u said someone might be white knighting. I would think u have someone in mind?

In post 759, MariaR wrote:You saying you're aware of the gamestate is even more concerning than if you told me 'yeah I'm a bit confused right now.' Because you haven't explained why I'm scum. Well, you quoted a post and said 'that's why I'm voting her' but anyone can do that. You say you don't get the gobble wagon after responding to a quote where me and Bingle both cased him. So I know you didn't miss it. To me it feels like you're just making up being clueless to not get on the gobble wagon.

i'm pretty sure i said why i'm voting you - your initial gobble case / push was bad and looked fake

i can see the cases and still not get where the flashwagon came from

In post 758, skitter30 wrote:

In post 751, MariaR wrote:Weird because you don't understand the wagon or weird because it was scum driven in your eyes?

weird because i don't udnerstand the wagon so it makes me question if it's scum driven
but then ss started shading the people opposing the wagon which i thought was strange

People often fear what they don't understand. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it's scum driven. Although I find it hard that you don't understand it in the first place considering anytime gobble has been asked to explain something he says you'll carry him. If I, one of your main scumreads are pushing it you should be saying 'hey guys Maria is scum pushing gobble because of xyz' not sitting here going 'what is this wagon?'

In post 762, skitter30 wrote:

In post 759, MariaR wrote:You saying you're aware of the gamestate is even more concerning than if you told me 'yeah I'm a bit confused right now.' Because you haven't explained why I'm scum. Well, you quoted a post and said 'that's why I'm voting her' but anyone can do that. You say you don't get the gobble wagon after responding to a quote where me and Bingle both cased him. So I know you didn't miss it. To me it feels like you're just making up being clueless to not get on the gobble wagon.

i'm pretty sure i said why i'm voting you - your initial gobble case / push was bad and looked fake

i can see the cases and still not get where the flashwagon came from

And why is it bad/fake? You need to use more words that aren't just buzz.

mariar what do you think my push on you is

In post 764, MariaR wrote:And why is it bad/fake? You need to use more words that aren't just buzz.

i don't know. it didn't feel like something you actually believed. i don't have more words to articulate it but i can read it again and try to see if i can

In post 757, skitter30 wrote:pyp

I mean, I'm in total agreement that I'm more distant in this game than I was in that one.

But what makes you think there isn't another reason for it?

In particular, I think that having just come back a few hours ago from a weekend V/LA during which 20 pages of content was produced would put me at a pretty significant distance from the thread, at least for a little while.

In post 765, skitter30 wrote:mariar what do you think my push on you is

Is this where I'm supposed to say 'bad/fake.' Your push on me seems really convenient considering you have no context behind the main base of my push?

In post 766, skitter30 wrote:

In post 764, MariaR wrote:And why is it bad/fake? You need to use more words that aren't just buzz.

i don't know. it didn't feel like something you actually believed. i don't have more words to articulate it but i can read it again and try to see if i can

Why wouldn't I believe it? You haven't played a lot with me. You weren't in the game in question. I just don't get how town you can reach the answer you have because you don't have the information to reach it.

Alright Blake feel free to revote although SS is looking juicy.

i know, i acknowledged that.
i'm not voting you for the distance-ness, because it could be explained by the vla

i voted you for shading the people who objected to the gobble wagon because i don't get how that makes sense from the perspective of someone townreading gobble

In post 769, skitter30 wrote:i voted you for shading the people who objected to the gobble wagon because i don't get how that makes sense from the perspective of someone townreading gobble

Why is that something I'm more likely to do as scum?

Do you think I'm in the habit of intentionally appearing superficially contradictory (and it's NOT contradictory, by the way!) as scum for shits and giggles?

In post 768, MariaR wrote:Alright Blake feel free to revote although SS is looking juicy.

Your skill at reading me is impeccable, as always.

In post 401, MariaR wrote:I want gobble to explain like, anything. His reads feel entirely made up on the spot/meaning to take advantage of the game state. It's a light read that will probably change when he gives me the sit down, but until then I will call him scum. This game had a lot more filler than I was expecting, making it a bit harder to get into it.

it was still a relatively early point of the game and this feels like a baseless accusation ^

In post 428, MariaR wrote:Aka you're not gonna do it because they are made up. Got it~

like why do you think they're made up?

and then you shade gobble for a while without voting him

skitter v maria isn't very interesting.

In post 770, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 769, skitter30 wrote:i voted you for shading the people who objected to the gobble wagon because i don't get how that makes sense from the perspective of someone townreading gobble

Why is that something I'm more likely to do as scum?

Do you think I'm in the habit of intentionally appearing superficially contradictory (and it's NOT contradictory, by the way!) as scum for shits and giggles?

i have no idea, but you can be scum and not playing perfectly and mess up

i don't know why town with those reads would say that, so it seems scummy to me. like it doesn't fit with the thought process you're purporting to have about the game, and that's a scum characteristic imo