Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2020 5:44 am
Vote count 1.18
with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2020-07-07 13:00:00)
I made it to page 26.In post 580, DkKoba wrote:In post 233, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are you high or something?In post 192, Tuxedo Mask wrote:They are also being way less confrontational.
I'm less confrontational because we're in the look for good guys phase, not the look for bad guys phase.In post 237, Tuxedo Mask wrote:You can still make a town block by aggressively scum hunting. You just use POE.In post 233, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:are you high or something?In post 192, Tuxedo Mask wrote:They are also being way less confrontational.
I'm less confrontational because we're in the look for good guys phase, not the look for bad guys phase.In post 241, Deimos27 wrote:This is a very good response and I feel like an idiot for not making the connection on my own.In post 235, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Like I'm not even looking for scum right now, so it makes no sense to run aggressive attacks on people since we're doing coalition building not scum lynchingIn post 242, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:that's such an ass-backwards way of building a good town block.In post 237, Tuxedo Mask wrote:You can still make a town block by aggressively scum hunting. You just use POE.
Attacking people to try to make them slip doesn't really work when you're not in the lynching phase of the game. if anything it's a distraction.In post 243, Tuxedo Mask wrote:I really don't see it as a reason to play differently, care to explain? It also doesn't wave away the reduced post count. Something Bear said they do as scumIn post 241, Deimos27 wrote:This is a very good response and I feel like an idiot for not making the connection on my own.In post 235, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Like I'm not even looking for scum right now, so it makes no sense to run aggressive attacks on people since we're doing coalition building not scum lynchingI think this interaction is important.In post 244, Tuxedo Mask wrote:I consider your playstyle a distraction regardless. If you think someone is scummy and can convince others, that seems like a good way to keep scum out of the coalition.In post 242, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:that's such an ass-backwards way of building a good town block.In post 237, Tuxedo Mask wrote:You can still make a town block by aggressively scum hunting. You just use POE.
Attacking people to try to make them slip doesn't really work when you're not in the lynching phase of the game. if anything it's a distraction.
It's the primary reason why I read Tux as town and why I had my early scumread on Pooky(the comment about going further into their ISO)
I don't find their analysis logical or consistent.
Ooo that's fun analysisIn post 204, Tuxedo Mask wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... er_sort=GoIn post 199, Deimos27 wrote:Game's been up for what, 10 hours? And he has 33 posts. I don't know how much he usually posts, but that looks pretty solid to me.In post 192, Tuxedo Mask wrote:I don't have a town read of Pooky, they said in Lovers that they post way less as scum. And while they're posting more than many others in this game, they are posting way less than themselves. They are also being way less confrontational.
What do you mean by being less confrontational?
In that same amount of time he got to 90 posts in Lovers. He was also heavily pursuing reads. Just constant unrelenting pressure, and insults. He also cited his post count as evidence of his townies multiple times. Saying he doesn't post nearly as much as scum. He is currently not posting nearly as much.
These are literally my reads, minus TuxIn post 214, DonCorleone wrote:Okay.
Sleeper is town.
Clover is town.
Pooky is lightly town.
Votato is lightly town.
Aldus is null.
Bugspray is null.
Deimos is lightly scum.
Tux may be scum.
There are so many parts of this post that ping me tonally.In post 706, Clover Ebi wrote:Does anyone know if DK is normally this energetic/aggro as scum? I'm inclined to townread this entrance. It feels pretty genuine to me.In post 324, DkKoba wrote:im actually reading harder into their ISO.. how TF did yall let him get in so far??????????????????
Sleeper on page 15 seems pretty ok to me. The uneasy thought process is one I have all the time yet try to hide and fail to do so.
Idk how anyone has me in a team right now when I should be in zero with how little I've posted.
Why is DK obvtown bad for the current coalition?In post 742, Klick wrote:HURT: all
Alright let's do this. This looks like a shitshow
I've skimmed a little bit in the last few pages and DK's ISO and my main takeaway was that DK was pretty obvtown. That would imply the current proposed coalition is sus. But I'll read up and see if that impression sticks.
In post 769, Deimos27 wrote:I'm paranoid enough of Pooky and DC to replace them for Koba and Tux
About what I'd expect from a town response here.In post 235, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Like I'm not even looking for scum right now, so it makes no sense to run aggressive attacks on people since we're doing coalition building not scum lynching