Page 31 of 66

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:44 pm
by Looker
In post 691, chkflip wrote:Okay, so I don't see the Dunnstral stuff as being anything less than genuine scumhunting. I agree that there could potentially be a maf in osuka/looker, but gun to my head I don't think it's osuka off of today's play. Maybe it's the fact that he resembles my typical style but it reads town to me as well. So my surface level reads so far aside from the obvious IC clears and the cop inno I'm willing to town bucket Dunn and osuka so far. If Walter wasn't IC I'd town bucket him for his post about being disappointed in his D1 play. I'd also town bucket Gyp for a reason I already don't remember off my skim. I'll look back again to find that post if you'd like but you inno'd him, so, I don't think it matters that much.

The more I look at Truth the more I see newb!scum. The aversion to being "honest," the awkward 2-team question piling in with the other newb card self-awareness he keeps doing just isn't sitting well with me rn.
What do you think about superbowl?

  • Are OMGUS's no longer scummy? Can anyone tell me why osuka and superbowl both tried to dogpile me? It didn't come across in what they posted. Redtea's absence and no one calling him out on it is kind of suspect to me, coupled with superbowl switching out our names before going V/LA himself. These reticent non-voters aren't really helpful either.
  • If we had 13 players and 3 are scum, that's about one out of four players. We had superbowl vs bugspray and osuka vs psyche - by the odds one of superbowl or osuka should be scum. I don't see how the worst could be so confident that osuka is not.
  • Does anyone know why superbowl voted me before running away?
  • Does anyone feel that Dunnstral has an actual "list"? Of course I'm paranoid/bias because he's targeting me, but I would expect 'I don't want to vote other people' to bring about a little more questioning.

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:18 pm
by chkflip
In post 750, Looker wrote:What do you think about superbowl?
I haven't seen enough to hold an opinion. He's another I'm interested in seeing more of.

VOTE: Truth

I want to trust my Dunn town read and he's town reading this, but like, also no. The votes are fucking awkward at best, the incessant focus on my slot that has apparently happened throughout most of the game (trying to goo on me, boy?), and there's no actual content in the votes either. Just excuses. This can go and if it flips red I'm gunning on osuka and Dunn holding at least one scum between them.

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:18 pm
by the worst
looker what are your reads

frankly idc whether you think i should be confident or not. i'm not going to take you shading my competency, but you are welcome to discuss if you think i am wrong.

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:21 pm
by osuka
In post 750, Looker wrote:
In post 691, chkflip wrote:Okay, so I don't see the Dunnstral stuff as being anything less than genuine scumhunting. I agree that there could potentially be a maf in osuka/looker, but gun to my head I don't think it's osuka off of today's play. Maybe it's the fact that he resembles my typical style but it reads town to me as well. So my surface level reads so far aside from the obvious IC clears and the cop inno I'm willing to town bucket Dunn and osuka so far. If Walter wasn't IC I'd town bucket him for his post about being disappointed in his D1 play. I'd also town bucket Gyp for a reason I already don't remember off my skim. I'll look back again to find that post if you'd like but you inno'd him, so, I don't think it matters that much.

The more I look at Truth the more I see newb!scum. The aversion to being "honest," the awkward 2-team question piling in with the other newb card self-awareness he keeps doing just isn't sitting well with me rn.
What do you think about superbowl?

  • Are OMGUS's no longer scummy? Can anyone tell me why osuka and superbowl both tried to dogpile me? It didn't come across in what they posted. Redtea's absence and no one calling him out on it is kind of suspect to me, coupled with superbowl switching out our names before going V/LA himself. These reticent non-voters aren't really helpful either.
  • If we had 13 players and 3 are scum, that's about one out of four players. We had superbowl vs bugspray and osuka vs psyche - by the odds one of superbowl or osuka should be scum. I don't see how the worst could be so confident that osuka is not.
  • Does anyone know why superbowl voted me before running away?
  • Does anyone feel that Dunnstral has an actual "list"? Of course I'm paranoid/bias because he's targeting me, but I would expect 'I don't want to vote other people' to bring about a little more questioning.
lol this is a scumpost

I’m down to vote truth or looker this game, leaning towards looker because truth just plays such a weird game that it’s honestly kind of entertaining

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 1:54 pm
by Titus
VOTE: Looker

Let's see what happens with counterwagons.

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 2:07 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 737, Titus wrote:
In post 736, Dunnstral wrote:Poe off people I don't want to vote

I think I wrote Titus off too quickly in my head... it's entirely possible that she is scum
Why did you "write me off" at all? I haven't done much because I just got here.
I'm not sure

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 2:08 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 750, Looker wrote:Does anyone feel that Dunnstral has an actual "list"?
I was looking at the vote count

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 2:11 pm
by Titus
In post 755, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 737, Titus wrote:
In post 736, Dunnstral wrote:Poe off people I don't want to vote

I think I wrote Titus off too quickly in my head... it's entirely possible that she is scum
Why did you "write me off" at all? I haven't done much because I just got here.
I'm not sure
When did you write me off?

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 2:14 pm
by the worst
VOTE: looker

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 3:54 pm
by the worst
Oh I forgot to mention I don't actually have a clear on Gypyx. lol.
at most there's 1 scum between him and Nash based off D1 stuff I think he's more likely than rand town but the fact he's noped outta the thread is making me a bit lukewarm

Nash/chk slot is probably town

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:31 pm
by osuka
VOTE: looker

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:21 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 759, the worst wrote:but the fact he's noped outta the thread is making me a bit lukewarm
That's not really fair if he thought he was cleared

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:43 pm
by the worst
i don't really think he's scum i'm just like, a bit anxious about yelling that he's locktown, lol
he's still >>rand town

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 6:43 pm
by the worst
thank u for keeping me accountable for my nonsense btw

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 7:41 pm
by chkflip
What's the case on Looker, exactly?

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:21 pm
by the worst
what's your case on looker

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:22 pm
by the worst
why don't you want to scumread looker, chkflip?

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:26 pm
by chkflip
Don't put words in my mouth, tough guy.

I see "lol this is a scumpost" followed by three votes and no case. So, as people who've read the game, I'm looking to see if there's something I'm missing. I remember all of two Looker posts and they read the same, which isn't particularly town, but I'm not willing to let Truth continue to newb!scum it up because "lolmeta." Fuck that.

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:28 pm
by the worst
truth isn't off the hook because lolmeta imo
but if we're not policy eliming, we're gonna lynch someone with bad associatives/interactions

i actually think it was u who like, pointed out the osuka/looker antisynergy/opportunism vibe

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:31 pm
by the worst
also i put words into the mouths of
whomever
i
please
!!!

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:35 pm
by chkflip
I said there could be one there. Didn't mention the other bit.

The 1v1 angle they shot early day gave me vibes that it isn't TvT but, I can't stress this enough apparently, I have a much stronger read against Truth.

So again I ask... what's the case on Looker?

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:36 pm
by the worst
uh i read into you putting one scum in looker & osuka, yea. they don't feel like they're interacting in a way which is mutually wholesome and i think i buy osuka's act somewhat more than looker's ya

can you gimme like a nice tidy review on why truth is scum? i think they're playing opportunistically but they may just be trying not to be eliminated

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:40 pm
by chkflip
Aside from what I mentioned in , or...?

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 8:43 pm
by chkflip
His last two votes are attempts to pocket you and the "If I was scum" in the last vote is WIFOM bullshit that you're letting slide for reasons beyond my level of comprehension.

Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:17 pm
by the worst
so sassy ~