Page 31 of 167

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:23 am
by Redados
In post 747, duppin wrote:
In post 745, Redados wrote:
In post 597, duppin wrote:
In post 364, Redados wrote:I'm semi-upset that we're on page 15 and it feels like we just left RVS. Not cool.
i have to admit that i really dislike this post. also credited Shelly for finally moving the game out of rvs in , i can appreciate the fact that perhaps the game didn't move in the direction you wanted but yeah.
overall you come across as really careful to me which i find suspicious
trying to do more of a stream of consciousness for this game just because of the sheer number of pages, I am not being very careful especially
hm I could probably buy that. When you've caught up please let me know who you find suspicious
I've caught up, but I've read everything exactly once. I plan on keeping it that way, because of the sheer number of pages. When we get to something more consequential, like a lim, or if someone asks me to expand on a read, I will ISO dive or reread. But because we're 20 pages past less than 24 hours in, I can't do as much re-reading as I have done in my nine player games.

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:24 am
by duppin
In post 750, Redados wrote:
In post 747, duppin wrote:
In post 745, Redados wrote:
In post 597, duppin wrote:
In post 364, Redados wrote:I'm semi-upset that we're on page 15 and it feels like we just left RVS. Not cool.
i have to admit that i really dislike this post. also credited Shelly for finally moving the game out of rvs in , i can appreciate the fact that perhaps the game didn't move in the direction you wanted but yeah.
overall you come across as really careful to me which i find suspicious
trying to do more of a stream of consciousness for this game just because of the sheer number of pages, I am not being very careful especially
hm I could probably buy that. When you've caught up please let me know who you find suspicious
I've caught up, but I've read everything exactly once. I plan on keeping it that way, because of the sheer number of pages. When we get to something more consequential, like a lim, or if someone asks me to expand on a read, I will ISO dive or reread. But because we're 20 pages past less than 24 hours in, I can't do as much re-reading as I have done in my nine player games.
but surely you find some people more suspicious than others? I am not asking for detailed reads at least not yet, just some names

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:36 am
by Noraa
In post 737, Odd Day Jester wrote:
In post 735, Noraa wrote:this-this doesn't count cuz idk what a townblock is
People you think are town.
I've never played with anyone here besides the few in doggos
currently only have reads on the people in doggos
shelly plays strange. I dont understand her line of thinking ... ever. She'll be on my null for a long time bc I have a very hard time figuring her out.
Redados is giving me VERY different vibes here as compared to doggos where he was town. And these vibes r low-key scummy as well so he has an SR from me.
Mundivore has said like two things so im not sure what to think there. As town he was much more active...

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:39 am
by NorwegianboyEE
You could at least try to have an impression on other players than those you played with.

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 3:42 am
by Noraa
Everyone else I have reads on but im waiting to find out if these are play style or actually AI

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 4:15 am
by Redados
In post 751, duppin wrote:but surely you find some people more suspicious than others? I am not asking for detailed reads at least not yet, just some names
not sure yet beyond what I've already said.

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 4:25 am
by duppin
In post 755, Redados wrote:
In post 751, duppin wrote:but surely you find some people more suspicious than others? I am not asking for detailed reads at least not yet, just some names
not sure yet beyond what I've already said.
I see, but could you explain what you are waiting for at the moment then? you don't seem to be pushing in any direction and you seem to be fine with everything that is going on which surprises me given the fact that you were very vocal about not liking the current game state earlier

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 4:28 am
by Redados
In post 756, duppin wrote:
In post 755, Redados wrote:
In post 751, duppin wrote:but surely you find some people more suspicious than others? I am not asking for detailed reads at least not yet, just some names
not sure yet beyond what I've already said.
I see, but could you explain what you are waiting for at the moment then? you don't seem to be pushing in any direction and you seem to be fine with everything that is going on which surprises me given the fact that you were very vocal about not liking the current game state earlier
I'm waiting to see some real wagons and how people react to them as opposed to these reaction-test wagons.

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 4:29 am
by duppin
In post 757, Redados wrote:
In post 756, duppin wrote:
In post 755, Redados wrote:
In post 751, duppin wrote:but surely you find some people more suspicious than others? I am not asking for detailed reads at least not yet, just some names
not sure yet beyond what I've already said.
I see, but could you explain what you are waiting for at the moment then? you don't seem to be pushing in any direction and you seem to be fine with everything that is going on which surprises me given the fact that you were very vocal about not liking the current game state earlier
I'm waiting to see some real wagons and how people react to them as opposed to these reaction-test wagons.
But why don't you try to push a wagon then?

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 4:29 am
by Noraa
^scums never like to start or hammer wagons

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 4:41 am
by Odd Day Jester
In post 757, Redados wrote:I'm waiting to see some real wagons and how people react to them as opposed to these reaction-test wagons.
shelly and Saudade's wagon both seem plenty real to me - composing of people who actually think they're sus. Why do you think they're reaction tests, Charizard?

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:41 am
by Redados
In post 760, Odd Day Jester wrote:
In post 757, Redados wrote:I'm waiting to see some real wagons and how people react to them as opposed to these reaction-test wagons.
shelly and Saudade's wagon both seem plenty real to me - composing of people who actually think they're sus. Why do you think they're reaction tests, Charizard?
I think they're reaction tests because a) everyone is going to find Shelly sus because she is super sus in general (meta) and b) it's not a real wagon, it's the first day of day one

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:43 am
by NorwegianboyEE
I'm not voting Saudade as an reaction test.

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:43 am
by NorwegianboyEE
And even if i did, why would you point it out. That's just anti-town.

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 5:54 am
by Noraa
pointing it out is kinda anti town I agree since if it was a reaction test, then norwee would be town scumhunting and u saying that would ruin everything. However I dont think Saudade has done anything scummy as of right now and would love to hear a case on him.

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:10 am
by Redados
I've only played in nine person games. Anyone have a short list of tips/differences on bigger games vs those initial newbie games?

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:13 am
by Noraa
difference: there's more people
ur welcome

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:14 am
by Redados
VOTE: Noraa

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:17 am
by Noraa
In post 764, Noraa wrote:pointing it out is kinda anti town I agree since if it was a reaction test, then norwee would be town scumhunting and u saying that would ruin everything. However I dont think Saudade has done anything scummy as of right now and would love to hear a case on him.
so I lightly Fos Redados here

[quoteVOTE: ="In post 765, Redados"]I've only played in nine person games. Anyone have a short list of tips/differences on bigger games vs those initial newbie games?[/quote]

He doesn't reply instead starts pulling out his newbie card asking for tips which is exactly what I did in doggos
In post 766, Noraa wrote:difference: there's more people
ur welcome
I jokingly reply
In post 767, Redados wrote:VOTE: Noraa
and I get a vote with no reasoning backing it up

Scum!Redados ur not doing too hot rn
VOTE: Redados

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:18 am
by Redados
not funny and not helpful!

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:19 am
by Noraa
In post 769, Redados wrote:not funny and not helpful!
ooo is this post here that u posted helpful or funny?

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:20 am
by Redados
In post 770, Noraa wrote:
In post 769, Redados wrote:not funny and not helpful!
ooo is this post here that u posted helpful or funny?
I should have included it in post 767. thought it was implied but it wasn't so I added it

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:23 am
by Noraa
Dont u think that's terrible evidence to be backing up a vote? I'm starting to agree that ur not trying to scumhunt and the only people who dont need to scumhunt are the scums themselves

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:32 am
by Odd Day Jester
I'm with Noraa on this one. Redados, I don't find this convincing:
I think they're reaction tests because a) everyone is going to find Shelly sus because she is super sus in general (meta) and b) it's not a real wagon, it's the first day of day one
The fact it's early into the day phase doesn't mean a lot when there's been TONNES of content already.

Also, people are telling you their votes are serious, so why are you insisting everyone's secretly voting for reaction testing purposes?

A NEW PLOTLINE HAS APPEARED. Redado's journey in uncovering all of the super secret reaction tests (I jest, Redados. you're great)

Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2020 6:38 am
by Redados
I think I'm just being sensitive and emotional but initially reading post #766 is the angriest I've felt since joining this site.