Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2021 9:53 am
So they could mislynch and win, no one sred andante
I dont think you have hard bussed. Im saying seeds says we need all 3 town to vote together when that is not the case because scum will easily bus creative here.In post 748, skitter30 wrote:wheme you could also make a very distinct argument that i'm not 'hardbussing my partner' here
If I am trying to town case whemestar can I see this post as townie? If he is scum skitter has pushed that he is sus, he knows that he needs another ML on someone to win the game wheme doesn't really seem to set up much of a plan in who to vote next if that can be considered townie. But maybe it's just that he knows SAMCRO is flipping town and can still call skitter scum the next day regardless.In post 590, WhemeStar wrote:Samcro being scum makes me think his partner cannot be skitter.
I don't think you understand the point I am making. It feels like you are not following my thoughts through. I was trying to express that you not really setting up who your next ML could be considered from a town perspective while Skitter seemed to be moving in to setup on you as an ML. But that if I assume you are mafia the quote loses its meaning in that context because SAMCRO will flip town and maybe in your mind skitter's push on you will lose its momentum in the town's mind.In post 753, WhemeStar wrote:Dude did you not think samcro was obv town ?
Im not liking a lot of your posts today so far and am trying to convince myself that your not a super deep wolf and its just the simple solve with skitter/creativeIn post 759, six pomegranate seeds wrote:I'm not sure what you questioning me accomplishes at this point.
What do you not like about my posts? Can you point something out?In post 760, WhemeStar wrote:Im not liking a lot of your posts today so far and am trying to convince myself that your not a super deep wolf and its just the simple solve with skitter/creativeIn post 759, six pomegranate seeds wrote:I'm not sure what you questioning me accomplishes at this point.
I think you can interpret it in different ways but I don't want to express my thoughts until later - would prefer to hear other's (ie wheme and skitters) answers first.In post 757, Kazyan wrote:The Andante kill doesn't have an obvious cause to me. Maybe it's that Andante's reads were a wildcard? They didn't say anything after the tracker claim.
Still trying to towncase whemestar.In post 756, WhemeStar wrote:I have 0 reason to hard bus creative when it cmae to the samcro/creative 1v1
I don't know I dont really do Night kill analysis because im bad at it.In post 762, six pomegranate seeds wrote:h
It probably came off that way but thats not what I was trying to come across as. I was just trying to say that SAMCRO wasn't the most obv town person at that time anymore so I didn't understand why you were going to flat out refuse to vote him ever. I guess it makes sense from your POV as to why though because if I was you my top town read would have been SAMCRO at that time.In post 763, six pomegranate seeds wrote:488 This is where I had a scumping on you. If you thought creative was so scum why were you trying to make me question my SAMCRO TR when I had just hard committed to SAMCRO town?
Why did you say this skitter?In post 703, skitter30 wrote:i mean im not intending that as a townslip but i still can't tell if we're in 2a or 2c
No worries we have lots of time.In post 661, skitter30 wrote:seeds i really admire your dedication and rereading, you're very thorough
Q for wheme: what was the front Pooky was putting on here?In post 95, WhemeStar wrote:Skitter do you have a lot of experience with pooky?
This play from him currently seems fake and sounds like he’s trying to put on a front for no reason.
Unless he does this type of thing every game then that would change my mind.