Posted: Thu Jul 15, 2021 8:18 am
uhhhhhhhhh jeteon? is this a trick question :^)In post 747, HockeyFan wrote:because who tunnels of 80% of d1 on 1 player smhIn post 744, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:hockey, huuuuuuuuuh
that actually can't be your conclusion from this
how is instigating a tunnel d1 scum
you haven't either, which is explicitly why i haven't voted yetIn post 748, T3 wrote:VFP has literally done nothing except make an unexplained and bad meta case against me.
I like to. I also think its a good idea.In post 747, HockeyFan wrote:because who tunnels of 80% of d1 on 1 player smhIn post 744, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:hockey, huuuuuuuuuh
that actually can't be your conclusion from this
how is instigating a tunnel d1 scum
Oh hockey is jeteon? I'm the noah guy from the politics server.In post 751, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:uhhhhhhhhh jeteon? is this a trick question :^)In post 747, HockeyFan wrote:because who tunnels of 80% of d1 on 1 player smhIn post 744, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:hockey, huuuuuuuuuh
that actually can't be your conclusion from this
how is instigating a tunnel d1 scum
you haven't either, which is explicitly why i haven't voted yetIn post 748, T3 wrote:VFP has literally done nothing except make an unexplained and bad meta case against me.
Name a game I have ever made a bad meta case against you!In post 748, T3 wrote:VFP has literally done nothing except make an unexplained and bad meta case against me.
no, jeteon is jeteon and hockeyfan is hockeyfanIn post 753, T3 wrote:Oh hockey is jeteon? I'm the noah guy from the politics server.
but the majority of the content is thisIn post 631, VFP wrote:T3 is just trying to survive here rather than scum hunt.
Thats not what town T3 does.
--In post 447, VFP wrote:Everything in his ISO
In post 466, VFP wrote:Your scum side is showing, T3!
In post 399, VFP wrote:Buldge / T3 scum team?In post 393, The Bulge wrote:James/VFP scumteam? i dig it
I dig it.
You get content from me day 2 onwards!
In post 751, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:uhhhhhhhhh jeteon? is this a trick question :^)In post 747, HockeyFan wrote:because who tunnels of 80% of d1 on 1 player smhIn post 744, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:hockey, huuuuuuuuuh
that actually can't be your conclusion from this
how is instigating a tunnel d1 scum
cows, this is the third time, u have attempted to discredit my push on VFP becasue of "wHy wOuLd sCuM dO tHis/how is that scum". I think cows flips red if VFP is red
you haven't either, which is explicitly why i haven't voted yetIn post 748, T3 wrote:VFP has literally done nothing except make an unexplained and bad meta case against me.
Stop trying to bus VFPIn post 756, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:
VFP, real talk
i need more content like thisbut the majority of the content is thisIn post 631, VFP wrote:T3 is just trying to survive here rather than scum hunt.
Thats not what town T3 does.--In post 447, VFP wrote:Everything in his ISOIn post 466, VFP wrote:Your scum side is showing, T3!In post 399, VFP wrote:Buldge / T3 scum team?In post 393, The Bulge wrote:James/VFP scumteam? i dig it
I dig it.
your push sux + VFP's push sux but i think T3 is scum + you're projectingIn post 758, HockeyFan wrote:Stop trying to bus VFP
having a bad push > having no push fite me.In post 759, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:your push sux + VFP's push sux but i think T3 is scum + you're projectingIn post 758, HockeyFan wrote:Stop trying to bus VFP
I think u made a typo, should beIn post 761, JamesTheNames wrote:Can we get a list of the people who want to hammer scum T3 or town VFP?
I want to hammer T3.
FTR, at 1 point in a time, I didnt want to condemm any of these but since we're so close to deadline, I think we just condemm in those 2. I am also down to pivot to T3 if I have toIn post 763, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:hockey there's something that i don't know and you do and i keep seeing reasoning like VFP is tunnelling someone for most of the game, or VFP didn't no lim D1, so i'm just gonna assume that you just want a policy at this point
i think T3 having more scum equity is very apparent
singlehandedly the best pair to condemn fromIn post 764, HockeyFan wrote:FTR, at 1 point in a time, I didnt want to condemm any of these but since we're so close to deadline, I think we just condemm in those 2. I am also down to pivot to T3 if I have toIn post 763, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:hockey there's something that i don't know and you do and i keep seeing reasoning like VFP is tunnelling someone for most of the game, or VFP didn't no lim D1, so i'm just gonna assume that you just want a policy at this point
i think T3 having more scum equity is very apparent
sooooo which one are you gonna bus?In post 766, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:singlehandedly the best pair to condemn fromIn post 764, HockeyFan wrote:FTR, at 1 point in a time, I didnt want to condemm any of these but since we're so close to deadline, I think we just condemm in those 2. I am also down to pivot to T3 if I have toIn post 763, cowsloveSushirolls wrote:hockey there's something that i don't know and you do and i keep seeing reasoning like VFP is tunnelling someone for most of the game, or VFP didn't no lim D1, so i'm just gonna assume that you just want a policy at this point
i think T3 having more scum equity is very apparent
T3 of courseIn post 767, HockeyFan wrote:sooooo which one are you gonna bus?
a scum motive could possibly be to get townread as quickly as possible using theatrics, like hockey and lambda saidIn post 649, Clasko wrote:JamestheNames - I like them as town rn. I'm taking the claim at face value. They've had some fluff posts but I particularly like James' #304 - no nonsense, clear thought process.I thought the timing of the claim didn't seem like it had a scum motive - near RVS stage, I imagine scum want to continue it for as long as possible to prevent the game opening up as quickly as it could.Him pushing people to vote also seems pro-town as (surface level reasoning incoming) how else are we supposed to eject scum?
overreaction is the essence of grandpa's posts. i think if i were to put all of grandpa's actions on a scale this would lean towards null-town. i also don't believe that hockey/grandpa is a pair because the talk over voting pools seem genuine and therefore not partneryIn post 650, Clasko wrote:GrandpaMo - In my notes, I thought their #305 on HockeyFan felt unnatural - possibly from scum. They know Hockey misinterpreted what TSTBS meant, yet this post looks like an unnatural overreaction, and coming from the guy who originally wanted to drop the discussion wrt James' #40 (see post #130), the whole interaction just gave me scum vibes, which conflicts with what I think about their pro-town actions in pushing people with questions and pressuring the inactive slots. Could Hockey have baited Grandpa with their misinterpretation? Maybe, but I still feel the response was unnatural. I want to have more time to think on Grandpa overall.
that's the impression i got from everybody pushing VFP, and i found it kinda aaaaaaaaaaa after a whileIn post 651, Clasko wrote:VFP - So we have to take a gamble with VFP because he's acting so differently he might be scum and hasn't proven himself that much as town this game... Do I give thim botd due to them being ill/waiting for slots to speak? If someone were to gun-to-head me for an answer, he doesn't look like scum protecting himself/a teammate???
i remember talking about that unvote, i think i'm going to backtrack given recent developments. i will summarize them below:In post 652, Clasko wrote:T3 - I forget who said #203 was good from them (fairly sure someone said it) but I thought part of them unvoting James due to "I put a lot of stock in meta, you don't care about it" when James explicitly stated he hated using meta was weak reasoning for the unvote. Uh, what else... they've reduced their pool of eliminations without giving reasonings, unless prompted, which we all expect from T3 at this point. TR'ing most of the cast and scumhunting less differs from the last two games I was in with them at least, where they were scum. I'm on the fence.
if you think there's enough information to give an updated read on looker now, making one would be beneficialIn post 653, Clasko wrote:Looker - Nothing to add about them currently as they have yet to speak, but I thought StrangeMatter could have done better things with their time instead of asking more questions when the game needed answers - just felt like deflection. I don't take much stock on Rocky's tonal posts (the slot Strange replaced into) compared to in-game actions, and more needed to come from them to justify any sort of read IMO.
nobody knows what bulge thinks anymore because they replaced, but i interpreted it as a sort of reaction test for me to react to because the conclusion they made from a reread that I asked for was aIn post 654, Clasko wrote:The Bulge - Well, that slot just replaced out, but I'll talk about their previous posts - I think Hockey was the one who said they had good tonal posts earlier, which I agreed with (specifically, showing resistance to James' claim - in a 'trying-to-see-the-intent-behind-it' sort of way), but they haven't done enough with their vote or looked anywhere outside of VFP/James. The shift from them townreading Strange's slot due to Rocky's tone, to later admitting the slot could be scum, doesn't sit well with me considering the slot should have been null to begin with (maybe I'm being overly harsh here).
someone noticed my deliberate interaction with nearly everybody here. i'm very happyIn post 655, Clasko wrote:cowsloveSushirolls - Looking back at their ISO, (which was a hard read - it's a LOT) they've done good things for the game. I'm reading their interactions with Hockey as light banter and natural, and the AtE on waiting for replacements slots to speak as genuine. They pushed James where he didn't need to be pushed (IMO) which gives me town vibes. I took note that they have made great strides to interact with most of the players in the thread bar my slot. I do feel like they're trying to bait reactions and ask important questions to get a better picture of the game rather than scum blending in, so I'm somewhat confident calling them town for now - not as much as James, mind you (watch them be the team lmao).
man, i don't even wanna comment on hockeyfanIn post 656, Clasko wrote:HockeyFan - His slot is okay. I think his interactions come off natural enough (similarly to cows' interaction with him). I humoured the idea he might have scum equity with Grandpa (as scum v scum) in my notes since I feel Grandpa's sudden push on him in post 305 would be safe to do since Hockey's slot was townread (to varying degrees) by some in the thread at that time, and scum voting a partner at that stage would present little risk but look good to town (but that's a WIFOM-y rabbit hole I'm not currently prepared to go down). He's acting like a more casual cows, perhaps because they've played together before. He's advancing his reads and the slot seems consistent from what i've read.
Bold claim, would it not look worse for you than it would for me?In post 772, VFP wrote:LLD, Clarke, and Grampa... your votes / not votes are just a waste.
LLD is probably town here from being passive. The others not so much.
A town T3 would probably make James scum.
Clarkso isn't looking good either.
I'm pretty happy with Cow, Hocker, and Looker though.
Grampa is meh I guess?