Mafiascum.net

In post 748, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 725, Titus wrote:

In post 718, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 717, Titus wrote:Normally, I wouldn't like Roden's post but I kinda do atm. Why is a mystery?

I don't think HockeyFan plays the game this why if scum with SF.

That leaves me with a conundrum as one of them should be scum with SF as the posting doesn't make sense.

What if... all 3 of us are town? I dont see why u think SF must be paired with one of us. Like what in her posting implies that? Sf's recent readslist had me as town and Roden as scum. Do you think scum!Sf puts either of thier partners in T/S. wouldnt they want to put them in null?

HockeyFan, you're new here obviously, not an alt. I generally have a rule of three. If scum lists three or more people in a list, it usually has scum in it. Roden being scum in her list is NAI.

SF selectively paying attention to only one of you and Roden doing the same thing doesn't sit well with me. Perhaps I am reading partners wrong as the goal may have been agency capture or whiteknight given how people reacted to your post.

Why so partner-focused this early?

It checks my work. If I get to three scumreads who can't be scum together, I accept it but keep looking at plausible teams. It's decent unless and until a mech solve happens.

So salsa is your first scum? If so isn't now a great time to vote?

Oh I had moved my vote to Kop. I intended to quote my SF post and saw that.

VOTE: SF

Realistically, I am down for either SF or Kop right now.

In post 736, T3 wrote:VOTE: salsa
Salsa is doing... basically nothing. She has maybe 15 serious posts in her 85 post ISO.

how do you distinguish that from her playstyle

I kinda wanna give SF a day because I miselim’d her D1 as scum in a previous game for similar play I think
link for those who want to see what I mean

In post 623, HockeyFan wrote:???? what does this mean.

I was tryna see if we were thinking the same thing when you replied to that. Because I am thinking about a narrative right now -- and you could be thinking of the same exasct narrative. And I knwo I am town, and if we are thinking about the same thing -- that could lead us to you being town having the same intuitive thought as me.

In post 755, Gamma Emerald wrote:I kinda wanna give SF a day because I miselim’d her D1 as scum in a previous game for similar play I think
link for those who want to see what I mean

i think this is scum.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

Grandpa, who is your mason buddy?

In post 757, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 755, Gamma Emerald wrote:I kinda wanna give SF a day because I miselim’d her D1 as scum in a previous game for similar play I think
link for those who want to see what I mean

i think this is scum.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald

Go on...

You wanna back that up?

In post 758, Titus wrote:Grandpa, who is your mason buddy?

DGB. LOL

In post 724, T3 wrote:

In post 722, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 716, T3 wrote:

In post 697, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, superbowl9 wrote:pedit: apparently softing D1 for no reason is cool now???

i was trying to think about this but im so confused.. the biggest flag is "i cant be a townleader because of my role" seems like bs to me LOL... just seems a bit of an excuse so he could continue to slide by being inactive.
it isn't cool at all, but im not sure how to proceed...

Nah.

Scum don't do that.

Absolutely false and do not try to convince people that this is the case

Pretty much all the time when I've seen someone openly claim PR on day 1 without any reason they have been town.

Can confirm.

The moon confirms this. Roden goes to my towncore.

In post 763, Titus wrote:The moon confirms this. Roden goes to my towncore.

????

In post 760, Gamma Emerald wrote:You wanna back that up?

I already have brought a scumcase on you and you have continued to act like you have contributed but you haven't done shit in this game. I am tired of you just being here and being townread for no fucking reason. Excuse my language.

I led it slide the first time where you have deflected me multiple times, but after that after you continue to ignore, it got annoying to the point where it isn't in town's wincon to continue the narrative / discussion > that makes you scum.

Just look at your own ISO, all you have done is nothing but ask questions (never follow up on them), sheep other people's read, and just restate other people's thoughts.

Also, where I voted you is a scummy quote, you saying you want to give SF a day comes froma scum mindset, because you have TMI they could be town, and will later on go with the flow on wether town scumreads him or townreads him. If town townreads him, you will townread him and get the credit that easily, if town scumreads him, you will scumread him and possibly miscondemn them; basically you are setting up this miscondemn.

You haven't pushed anyone; nor have played aggressive and this is through your town meta -- I have spectated some games, and you aren't acting completely how you would.

Look at post 701, 702, 703, then look at post 755, that nature where I talked about earlier -- just further confirms that. Just also look at post 519; never providing content but continues to sheep Hockeyfan here. The progression from 512 - 513. Come on man, these are just a few examples. ISO them, and you will find a LOT more. I am suprised NO ONE has spoke on about this lame playstyle.

VOTE: GrandpaMo
Idk which games you meta’ed but I think this is BS regardless

Also the reason I haven’t pushed as hard this game is because my effort hasn’t felt like it’s been needed here, both in terms of how this game and my other games are going

In post 766, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: GrandpaMo
Idk which games you meta’ed but I think this is BS regardless

In post 767, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also the reason I haven’t pushed as hard this game is because my effort hasn’t felt like it’s been needed here, both in terms of how this game and my other games are going

LOL -- you literally contradict your statement here.

You OMGUS me. Then say my meta read is BS -- I can give you an analysis on those games if youd like lmfao, so there is no need to lie!

2nd -- The way you contradict is by saying "I haven't pushed as hard this game" you admitted that you have been using effort, this usually comes from someone who does effort most of the time, then continue to say "hasn't felt like it's been needed here", a wack logic to undermine that statement. Actually scumread me, don't scumnread me because I scumread me. If you are town, you don't look like town in my perspective. Prove to me you are town, unless I have to believe you are scum. Bad reaction.

Like, I do this sort of cheerleader act sometimes when I don’t feel like taking the wheel
That’s what I’ve been doing this game and unless your spectating managed to miss that entirely I feel like you should get that

One step ahead of ya lmao

In post 756, GrandpaMo wrote:

In post 623, HockeyFan wrote:???? what does this mean.

I was tryna see if we were thinking the same thing when you replied to that. Because I am thinking about a narrative right now -- and you could be thinking of the same exasct narrative. And I knwo I am town, and if we are thinking about the same thing -- that could lead us to you being town having the same intuitive thought as me.

Ok but what narrative are u thinking of. Your post said "you would be able to tell me the team by just pointing out std for it". The answer is no, I cant.

In post 763, Titus wrote:The moon confirms this. Roden goes to my towncore.

?????????????? Didnt u just say SF can be paired with Roden lol

btw Gpa basically thunderdoming Gamma and letting attention get to him makes me feel a bit better about him but as i said earlier, still think theres one scum between them

@HockeyFan, I was until I saw Roden's PR hint.

Ah, ok. So, has your read on SF changed now that SF cant be paired with Roden(for now)

bump