Mafiascum.net

Thanks, Gamma. I was going to respond more but Val asked every question I wanted to.

I actually have the same thought as Snivy. I am wary of trusting someone who is determined to eliminate off of a list. I dunno if I'm allowed to go thru alt's meta of other accounts so I can't tell if this is a typical playstyle yet.

@Gamma, do you trust Jolyne's solve ability?

Not to say that it isn't a valid playstyle. It just feels weird to have this so early on in the game.

Maybe not the same thought as Snivy, actually.

In general, I trust it. There’s reads I disagree with but rather than debate in those I prefer to coalesce our efforts to lim people we both find suspicious.

Hm.

VOTE: Toxic

I changed my mind ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

just cuz of gammas input..?

Yeah. I think that’s good play advice. I got what I wanted out of my vote and now I want to move on to see what I can get out of my next vote.

Doesn’t hurt I townlean Gamma atp.

hmm yeah thats a fine explanation ig

the pics my idea on this wagon, not u specifically btw sorry if it seemed like it LOL

:/
Do u dislike anyone specific on it? If not, why the distaste?

In post 694, Jolyne wrote:

In post 690, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Confidence aside, what is scummy from Alice?
Besides, voting N_M is an universal desire we all have inside us.

lol i was having hopes you were town but at the very least you are confirmed scum to me atp based on the preflips i have - you can go after alice.

Hmph.
I do like the attitude though.

In post 760, marcistar wrote:hmm yeah thats a fine explanation ig

the pics my idea on this wagon, not u specifically btw sorry if it seemed like it LOL

No you don’t get to say that.

Toxic has done literally nothing townie, so shaddup.

I hate white knighting.

In post 751, DArby wrote:Not to say that it isn't a valid playstyle. It just feels weird to have this so early on in the game.

I townlocked half the playerlist(correctly) in a game on MU in the first 24 hours. I am just experienced enough with this game at this point.

I'm actually much less likely as scum to give out townreads like that(not that its beyond my scumrange I just prefer to go about things differently than the aggressive mass clearing).

Glad you at least managed to understand this is possible for me

In post 735, Jolyne wrote:

In post 684, AliceK wrote:Norwee is likely innocent. Darby and Gamma have at least 1 scum.

However I am too lazy to elaborate on that so:
VOTE: Not_Mafia

Alice trying to feed a 1v1 with people I feel are town already (sowing subtle doubt is a scum ploy/trying to force 5050s between townies) - and then after this they try to start a wagon on NM thats an easy way to dodge a lim themselves or norwee - who I believe is a strong possibility of partner - and bar that the plausibility remains when you factor in she may want to keep hands off the norwee wagon to not need to explain herself and look good off it - so it goes both ways here.

OK. But that doesn't explain your vote on me as I did all of it after you started pushing my elim.

Regarding Norwee I just think he is Town.
N_M slot should be dealt with asap.
Darby is likely a scum. About Gamma I scumread him, but I am not very confident about my read. Probably more days can give more intel.

yeet

toxictaipan [4]:

NorwegianboyEE, Dwlee99, Gamma Emerald, DArby

NorwegianboyEE [3]:

Val89

, toxictaipan, redtea

camelCasedSnivy [1]:

marcistar

Val89

[1]:

Not_Mafia

AliceK [1]:

Jolyne

Dwlee99 [1]:

T3

Not_Mafia [1]:

AliceK

not voting [1]:

camelCasedSnivy

mod notes

~ this vc was made with just the counter and without manual checking, so please let me know if there are mistakes

flavour

no context vote
and by no context I mean I have no context except for the vc
VOTE: toxictaipan

val or t3 will you join me and let not_mafia hammer
I forget whether toxic was in jolynes poe or not you can also join me
I can't promise results all I can promise is info but I thinkk it'll be juicy

In post 768, redtea wrote:val or t3 will you join me and let not_mafia hammer
I forget whether toxic was in jolynes poe or not you can also join me
I can't promise results all I can promise is info but I thinkk it'll be juicy

Why are you trying to hammer toxic? His only sin is low activity.

In post 769, AliceK wrote:

In post 768, redtea wrote:val or t3 will you join me and let not_mafia hammer
I forget whether toxic was in jolynes poe or not you can also join me
I can't promise results all I can promise is info but I thinkk it'll be juicy

Why are you trying to hammer toxic? His only sin is low activity.

because the vc looked interesting

In what way is it interesting?

In post 768, redtea wrote:val or t3 will you join me and let not_mafia hammer

You want to hammer a slot before a claim, or before they've had chance to catch up and respond to the wagon - a wagon that appears to have formed because a slot I consider scummy claims the wagonee TMI'd me as town based on a comment that basically expresses with something they themselves had considered (541).

No. Absolutely not. Marci is right; something stinks here.

Anyone else thinking that mafia want this day to end as soon as possible, because of some spicy night mechanics around that "backup acestic" thing?

I could work with you here, but why are you suggesting we start with AliceK over Norwee?

Yeah Jolyne. You should know better than anyone that it is smarter to vote on an leading wagon that you consider as likely to hit scum, than to vanity wagon Alice while the wagon on me stays.