All town wagon?
By definition, if i scumread you it cannot have been an all-town wagon.
- Norwee
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:32 am
by mc esther
okay, youre literally just telling me that my posts are scummy because im scum lmao. yes, everything ive said associatively has been exclusively fmpov. again, hence why i kinda want a three-group flip, because i know that my townflip is associatively meaningful, and i literally cannot prove this any other way (which is, the most infuriating thing in the world).
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:35 am
by mc esther
and like, holy shit if im scum please just vote me, i'll literally even self-hammer if that sweetens the deal. why wouldnt you want that? you either get a clear or a correct lim out of it, isnt this literally win-win?
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:36 am
by mc esther
i'd rather eliminate innocentvillager because im worried town will fuck up yeelo without the spare miselim, but this is far better than any six-group elim imo.
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:36 am
by Brighter Puppy
Even if i were to suddenly want to vote you now, the day is still early and need to hear from more slots.
- Norwee
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:37 am
by mc esther
yeah that's definitely true, and im really hoping dunn will pick it up like i have
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:39 am
by mc esther
(okay, im hoping dunn will pick it up minus the "why the fuck would you think that" reads, there's only room for one conspiracy theorist in this game)
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:42 am
by mc esther
In post 752, mc esther wrote:i'll literally even self-hammer if that sweetens the deal
i'll also promise to not self-hammer, if that's what actually sweetens the deal.
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 12:59 am
by mc esther
to be clear, in the absence of "okay but only if you..." either way, my preference is to not, this is practically my first day in terms of content and omg it feels good to suddenly have actual takes on the thread and shit.
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:04 am
by mc esther
but yes, it's a bit premature to be discussing this literally within twelve hours of gamestart (yes i think im done frivolously multiposting now)
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:05 am
by Brighter Puppy
Oh and when i said: "Would like to hear from other slots"
That was with big emphasis on InnocentVillager.
- Norwee
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:27 am
by mc esther
In post 738, mc esther wrote:does that hold even if myself and std both flip town? (okay, that cant really happen, that's gg perfect scumgame; i guess more, if inno flips maf and std flips town). like, would you really go dwlee over prism there, do you believe scum!dwlee so strongly advocates for eliminating three-group?
In post 740, mc esther wrote:they pushed three-group elimination at the start of day (before i'd made the observation that my townflip clears you and dunn). it's possible that they simply hadnt noticed (after all, it took me an embarrassing little while!), but this point probably came up in pt, right?
you didnt really answer this (you kinda just got caught up in the whole "but i dont think youre town" thing, which, fair lol), and though i think i can guess the answer, i'd kinda like to hear the reasons for it. is this an exception to your "no, prism cant be scum" belief, or would you instead take a line closr to "i dont see why dwlee would necessarily be aware of this"/"i dont see why theyd be so concerned with soft-clearing someone"? again, like, im asking your advice on how you would solve from my [stated] perspective, that im town and therefore maf on the wagon has to be elsewhere; i dont really care whether or not you believe my stated perspective is legitimate.
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:32 am
by mc esther
i guess it's a little selfish of me to expect the thread to spend so much time on a perspective they literally cant verify, but lmao youve been telling me that prism literally cant be maf and im like "okay, it's a weird read sure and i have a bad history with those; but even if i assume it's bad on those grounds and go for std first, can it really [again again, to me] be anyone else over prism if std flips town?"
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:45 am
by Brighter Puppy
I don't understand where you're going with this Dwlee argument. Namely, why it's supposedly towntelling that Dwlee argued for eliminating in the small hood? And it's not like they argued strongly either, they literally just said "ok maybe we can eliminate in 6 hood then" during middle of day 1 after seeing some minor opposition to their argument, and when Todoroki grew up as an wagon. Maybe this isn't exactly
damning
to the slot, but i sure as hell don't see why it would be town indicative.
And regarding: "whether it even can be anyone else other than Prism if STD!town", i'd argue that yes. There can in fact be anyone else. Namely Dwlee or Dunnstral. Did i miss where you went over why these slots are town? Because i feel like you said some reasons, but they weren't very good. And seemed to be based mostly on "This is from my POV as town" which for obvious reasons, i don't consider to be highly valid arguments. And even if you are town, that doesn't necessarily make your reasoning there correct.
Me and Fire even discussed that Dunnstral hasn't done anything town indicative other than be logical and advocate for the correct plays. Which scum can easily do. If Dunnstral is scum then he is one of those scum players that are hard to catch because you can only really say "Maybe they are going along with everything too smoothly/kindly" and that they would have stronger opinions or be more opposed to things if they were town.
- Norwee
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:47 am
by Brighter Puppy
Oh wait, i misread some votes.
Dwlee stayed voting small hood all of day 1.
But like... why is that something you think is townie?
- Norwee
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:49 am
by Brighter Puppy
Just to mention, i can maybe see some reasons for Dwlee!town. But they are not even close to what you are describing as the main reasons for why they are.
- Norwee
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:55 am
by Brighter Puppy
My thoughts might have been a bit messy there, looking back on it. Apologies.
- Norwee
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:01 am
by Pavowski
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:06 am
by mc esther
lmao maybe i should consider the all-town wagon theory, because at this point i feel more like im being encouraged to spam the thread repeating the same "yes, i did explicitly say im asking from my perspective" points ad nauseum than i am getting a real answer to a question whose basic premises i think ive outlined pretty explicitly.
i think i am town.
i think maf are on the wagon.
the above two makes you and dunn town.
scum!dwlee, knowing my alignment and reasonably assuming i believe maf to be on the wagon, would have the ability to determine this for themself.
scum!dwlee is therefore advocating for clearing puppy and dunn in advocating for a three-group flip day three.
is it more likely that scum!dwlee simply hadnt thought this through, or doesnt care about clearing a player, than that prism is mafia?
again, for i think the eightieth time at this point, from my perspective?
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:06 am
by mc esther
ebwop: in advocating for a three-group flip day two
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:13 am
by Brighter Puppy
Ok so you’re saying Dwlee would be intentionally making himself suspicious because of wagonomics if he were scum and to argue in favour of limming his partner in small-hood.
I did not understand your argument up to now.
To answer, i do not think on these terms. As scum from big hood is likely to buss their partner in small hood at some point, so to argue in favour of limming there is never town indicative imo.
- Norwee
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:15 am
by mc esther
okay. i'll take that under consideration as i chew on the prism read some more. i very much stand by it for now, but "dwlee's gotta bus eventually, why wouldnt he try it now?" is the sort of counterpoint i was looking for, thanks.
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:25 am
by Prism
Finished parsing and will write something up.
If you have any specific questions, now would be a good time.
I am curious as to why you think I was so ready to vote in the 6 given 646 and 655.
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 5:59 am
by Prism
I also do not think it was an all-town wagon at this juncture, and would not be surprised if there were 2, but I think you are underselling the possibility.
I have tried to make this as collated as possible.
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2022 6:12 am
by Prism
Contextually, it is important to know what happened in the 6hood overnight.
I advocated for 3, Kuriyama concurred, dwlee concurred. I frame it very explicitly as having a strong preference but not strongarming. The only comment from me in favor of voting in the 6, which came in the 6hood rather than in this thread, was when dwlee came by and dismissed Dragons' push on him without reacting to anything substantively. I said something along the lines of "Now I'm down to vote in 6" as an empty threat.
I stand by my statement that it is best to force people to hunt in both categories even if I want 3 at the end of the day.
If you remain concerned about my interactions with notscience, specifically around the unvote, I would strongly encourage visiting Perpetual MELO in conjunction with the above linked 516.
As a final note, I have been willing to play along with not outing your main, but it is difficult to do so when you ask about my expectations for you. You have been very sharp at setup design, and immediately understood that voting in 3 was better. It was jarring to see you find that single mediocre reason persuasive.