Mafiascum.net

In post 740, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 709, Greeting wrote:Though

Frog

kinda has a point, the Crescent/

BCG

slot is bad and we might need to just policy elim them.

It isn't a policy if they're legit scummy. If they were just a townie-looking player with a bad playstyle it would be a policy and I oppose that. But it isn't imho.

one reason i called it policy is that I didn't think BCG was actually scummy

In post 747, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:pooky why did you find crescent suspicious? Can you explain your read there?

cuz from my experience playing with her in https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=89682

and modding a game with her in https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=89657

she is very talkative and never stops posting and here she didn't do anything and just ghosted

In post 743, Charloux wrote:Nice double standard you got there. Is one of Pooky/Toog your scum buddy so you didn't call them out for naked votes? That doesn't make a lot of sense...

you are legitimately scum and I will get you voted one day

Like why call out the people that have been naked voting all day? Especially Toog

In post 747, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:No marci, do not sheep pooky, I'm town

In post 751, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 747, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:pooky why did you find crescent suspicious? Can you explain your read there?

cuz from my experience playing with her in https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=89682

and modding a game with her in https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=89657

she is very talkative and never stops posting and here she didn't do anything and just ghosted

if this is actually true, then she must have the absolute worst case of volume meta

ive seen people who dont even post once when they're scum

or maybe she is actually going thru something and that easily explains it and its massively rude for you to assume she's randing out because of being mafia.

In post 750, Cape90 wrote:

In post 740, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 709, Greeting wrote:Though

Frog

kinda has a point, the Crescent/

BCG

slot is bad and we might need to just policy elim them.

It isn't a policy if they're legit scummy. If they were just a townie-looking player with a bad playstyle it would be a policy and I oppose that. But it isn't imho.

one reason i called it policy is that I didn't think BCG was actually scummy

so whats the reason for policy then

marcistar
Save The Dragons
Charloux
MariaR
Fennec
Greeting
KittyTacky
Toogeloo
Enchant
PookyTheMagicalBear
Gamma Emerald
MalcolmTucker
Cape90
Frogsterking




SirRhett putting this dude here bc i legit havent read a single post by them


where im roughly at

In post 756, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:or maybe she is actually going thru something and that easily explains it and its massively rude for you to assume she's randing out because of being mafia.

you asked me why I voted for her

I explained why

also how the fuck am i being rude to Crescent she's literally not even here rofl

In post 759, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 756, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:or maybe she is actually going thru something and that easily explains it and its massively rude for you to assume she's randing out because of being mafia.

you asked me why I voted for her

I explained why

also how the fuck am i being rude to Crescent she's literally not even here rofl

there's a very easy plausible explaination why she isn't posting and it's that? ergo that's going to lead you to misread her very easily

In post 715, Enchant wrote:

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 704, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:charloux and std are town

ur bad

bruh Gamma

What
Even if I overlook BCG TRing two people I don’t, they’re also pushing 3 slots that I think are town (and 1 that I know is town)

In post 718, marcistar wrote:

In post 696, Frogsterking wrote:Marci do you still scum read Malcolm?

eh sure
i think its mid, he seems like lost!

why do u mindlessly simp me so mucb

Lost as in the game that just finished?

In post 761, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 715, Enchant wrote:

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 704, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:charloux and std are town

ur bad

bruh Gamma

What
Even if I overlook BCG TRing two people I don’t, they’re also pushing 3 slots that I think are town (and 1 that I know is town)

maybe dont roll scum against me

In post 723, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 697, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 668, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 665, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 663, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 661, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 658, Save The Dragons wrote:Not really I made like 10 arguments and you barely barely articulated one

Were any of them good though?

Yes

Try harder

I think you just randomly drew my name out of a hat and decided to double down on it and anyone who thinks you have a case is an idiot no offense

I reread and they weren't good. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man straw man fallacy, you're straw manning my case against you.

Also you claimed low activity != scum but there is evidence that there's a correlation. https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... _Detection MathBlade made a similar objection (and later flipped scum) when I accused him D1 in the large theme you just modded.

I am not strawmanning you if anything you are strawmanning me by picking and choosing what part of my case is important and what part of my case is just vaguely beneath you.

I still can't believe you are doubling down on me having work as me being scum.

Mathblade was low activity because he was sick not because he was scum

The thing is there is a way busy scum tend to play and it’s unfortunate to get called on it but it’s a real trend

what is the the way busy scum play

Pretty much exactly how Frogster described your play: basically talking into the thread to look like you’re sorting but not really putting in any actual effort to sort via interaction or w/e

In post 763, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:

In post 761, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 715, Enchant wrote:

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 704, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:charloux and std are town

ur bad

bruh Gamma

What
Even if I overlook BCG TRing two people I don’t, they’re also pushing 3 slots that I think are town (and 1 that I know is town)

maybe dont roll scum against me

Maybe don’t be a fucking creep
You hide behind this newbie facade but it’s painfully obvious who you are. Given that, your play seems remarkably like last time I saw scum!you.

In post 737, KittyTacky wrote:But I prefer BCG today.

I think Fenrir might be a better vote because his Claire vote looks like scum trying to put momentum back onto a town wagon

In post 765, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 763, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:

In post 761, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 715, Enchant wrote:

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 704, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:charloux and std are town

ur bad

bruh Gamma

What
Even if I overlook BCG TRing two people I don’t, they’re also pushing 3 slots that I think are town (and 1 that I know is town)

maybe dont roll scum against me

Maybe don’t be a fucking creep
You hide behind this newbie facade but it’s painfully obvious who you are. Given that, your play seems remarkably like last time I saw scum!you.

i haven't had a "newbie" facade. I indicated I knew several people including you just was lying on the down low.

and no, that's quite impossible for this to resemble the last time you saw scum me other than it matching me personality wise.

you couldn't even explain basic progression on your reads and got caught. its ok. better luck next time.

In post 752, Cape90 wrote:

In post 743, Charloux wrote:Nice double standard you got there. Is one of Pooky/Toog your scum buddy so you didn't call them out for naked votes? That doesn't make a lot of sense...

you are legitimately scum and I will get you voted one day

Like why call out the people that have been naked voting all day? Especially Toog

1)No personal insults please, even if true. You don't call a fat lady fat, do you now?
2)I called out Malcom on his double standard on naked voting, and his connection to std; NOT toog.

In post 766, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 737, KittyTacky wrote:But I prefer BCG today.

I think Fenrir might be a better vote because his Claire vote looks like scum trying to put momentum back onto a town wagon

so scum is std and I, we're both on different vanity wagons, and just allowing this cross to build. very good theory gamma. let's see if anyone actually buys it.

In post 757, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:

In post 750, Cape90 wrote:

In post 740, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 709, Greeting wrote:Though

Frog

kinda has a point, the Crescent/

BCG

slot is bad and we might need to just policy elim them.

It isn't a policy if they're legit scummy. If they were just a townie-looking player with a bad playstyle it would be a policy and I oppose that. But it isn't imho.

one reason i called it policy is that I didn't think BCG was actually scummy

so whats the reason for policy then

1. You were not reading the game CLEARLY. Acting like it at least.
2. You are looking at the game through the lens of extreme bias and this really annoying "I am right" lens that will make us lose the game if we pay full attention to you.

So while I don't think either of these things necessarily point to scum, it's an anti-town playstyle that frankly annoys me

i join games on alts so i can act more chill and not have to go as hard as i normally do but then gamma has to go and intentioanlly force me to revert back, probably intentional here to bait me into being aggro so he can hide behind the shield and then out my main as a weapon.

no, you will not.
VOTE: Gamma

This is not town.

In post 767, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:

In post 765, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 763, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:

In post 761, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 715, Enchant wrote:

Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 704, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:charloux and std are town

ur bad

bruh Gamma

What
Even if I overlook BCG TRing two people I don’t, they’re also pushing 3 slots that I think are town (and 1 that I know is town)

maybe dont roll scum against me

Maybe don’t be a fucking creep
You hide behind this newbie facade but it’s painfully obvious who you are. Given that, your play seems remarkably like last time I saw scum!you.

i haven't had a "newbie" facade. I indicated I knew several people including you just was lying on the down low.

and no, that's quite impossible for this to resemble the last time you saw scum me other than it matching me personality wise.

you couldn't even explain basic progression on your reads and got caught. its ok. better luck next time.

I opted not to explain because when I asked you a question in response to yours you got pompous
So I’m not gonna play ball with you when you’re just gonna be an assclown. Instead you can just die.

In post 770, Cape90 wrote:

In post 757, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:

In post 750, Cape90 wrote:

In post 740, KittyTacky wrote:

In post 709, Greeting wrote:Though

Frog

kinda has a point, the Crescent/

BCG

slot is bad and we might need to just policy elim them.

It isn't a policy if they're legit scummy. If they were just a townie-looking player with a bad playstyle it would be a policy and I oppose that. But it isn't imho.

one reason i called it policy is that I didn't think BCG was actually scummy

so whats the reason for policy then

1. You were not reading the game CLEARLY. Acting like it at least.
2. You are looking at the game through the lens of extreme bias and this really annoying "I am right" lens that will make us lose the game if we pay full attention to you.

So while I don't think either of these things necessarily point to scum, it's an anti-town playstyle that frankly annoys me

im allowed to have as much confidence as i'd like on things tyvm lmfao

interesting that this standard doesn't hold for you for gamma who is actually playing up a "i am right" lens or frog who well, is frogsterking, and as well as pooky too who has naked shifted votes and not attempted to sort my slot genuinely.

but yeah, i'm not reading "clearly" or whatever? nah you saw someone mention a policy and you wanted to force me to be PoE via that.

In post 771, Big Chungus Gaming wrote:i join games on alts so i can act more chill and not have to go as hard as i normally do but then gamma has to go and intentioanlly force me to revert back, probably intentional here to bait me into being aggro so he can hide behind the shield and then out my main as a weapon.

no, you will not.
VOTE: Gamma

This is not town.

I assure you there was ulterior motive but I’m still not scum. But yeah you just confirmed my whole triple-imposter theory I had on you. You’re a sick fuck and I kinda thought of you as a friend before but I sure as hell don’t now!