Mafiascum.net

In post 7498, petapan wrote:

In post 6122, Bell wrote:I'm town and I think Peta is town.
and if both groups miss we lose right?

p much

In post 6123, Annie Edison wrote:We have one day after this I’m pretty sure?

I’m really struggling with their scumread on you.

we'd have "one more day" but the likelihood of a comeback from 7:6 is astronomically small, scum only need one incorrect vote to win the game from there. between town disunity and advantage in numbers it's virtually guaranteed, if not on day 4 then on a later day. it's like a team being down 2-0 in the NBA - game 3 isn't literally "must win" but it is effectively that, since coming back from being down 3-0 simply does not happen.

In post 6124, Annie Edison wrote:If they seriously elim peta this games a joke lol

there's no actual chance it happens unless one of the people currently townreading me flips on me (and if they do, it's a scumclaim)

big lul about this one

hey you hear that ffery

if you scumread peta it's a scum claim.

In post 7489, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7487, petapan wrote:

In post 7473, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Peta you come out swingign at me, refuse to engage with me on day 2 about reads and now you're full blown apathy mode.

the main problem was actually that i tried to read reassess in the time we had, i tunneled superbowl, you told me "fu he's town", and that was about the end of it. over the night decided i didn't have good reason to townread you compared to other people

and i'm not in apathy mode no matter how many times you say it, nor is apathy a scumtell for me

cause he's fucking town

and i'm sorry you can say I'm not apathy mode all you want but

you're vote parking me and saying we're gonna lose we're gonna lose

what's your read on me rn then?

i think me vote parking you implies i don't really think you're town and no one's trying to talk me down out of it

bork i'm sorry that was an overaction, i apologize
i'm just very frustrated but i probably shouldn't have actually written that all out that way

@LLD That's not even what he said

In post 7501, petapan wrote:

In post 7489, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 7487, petapan wrote:

In post 7473, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Peta you come out swingign at me, refuse to engage with me on day 2 about reads and now you're full blown apathy mode.

the main problem was actually that i tried to read reassess in the time we had, i tunneled superbowl, you told me "fu he's town", and that was about the end of it. over the night decided i didn't have good reason to townread you compared to other people

and i'm not in apathy mode no matter how many times you say it, nor is apathy a scumtell for me

cause he's fucking town

and i'm sorry you can say I'm not apathy mode all you want but

you're vote parking me and saying we're gonna lose we're gonna lose

what's your read on me rn then?

i think me vote parking you implies i don't really think you're town and no one's trying to talk me down out of it

okay so all this shit where you do the interaction bit with me and try to look genuine it's all for show?

like I've been saying?

cause if you think i'm scum after how i've approached this game state peta

you know

it's a scum claim

In post 7503, midwaybear wrote:@LLD That's not even what he said

bitch who the fuck you think he meant about that line

he means deacon and dandelion

the people i am trying to convince.

don't think he meant you, lol

In post 7504, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:cause if you think i'm scum after how i've approached this game state peta

How would you say your play here deviates from what you would do as scum?

In post 7501, petapan wrote:i think me vote parking you implies i don't really think you're town and no one's trying to talk me down out of it

i don't think i could convince u to come down from that read as much as i can for LLD to come down from her read on u tbh

In post 7491, skitter30 wrote:you're saying that you're taking a concrete action to help with this problem that is literally impossible for me to see or know about without *asking the people in said hood how you're interacting there*.
like why would it even occur to me to think you're not posting there in order to mitigate this when you've made no indication as such here?
again literally the exact thing i'm complaining about?

I mean the only reason I brought it up is I wanted to note that I was making a good faith effort to not do the things that you (and others) have taken umbrage to in the past...and your angle seemed to be that since I can't prove I'm doing it that I'm not, and when I ask you what exactly your issue is with my play today you just say "they're not solving" or "you show me where they're solving" and you just keep falling back on that argument or flipping the burden of proof on me

re: naked vote: I am not required to convince you you're scum.

re: -ev to town: whatever. If I'm bad, post game I'll mea culpa to your heart's content if that will help. I do the best w/ what I've got. (I'm not taking it as a personal attack)

p-edit: haven't read like the last 10 posts yet

lld is absurdly tunneled on someone i'm p sure is town

In post 7506, midwaybear wrote:

In post 7504, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:cause if you think i'm scum after how i've approached this game state peta

How would you say your play here deviates from what you would do as scum?

I'm not doing self meta, bruv.

It's a waste of fucking energy. I could say a million lines and then people would say "lul self meta" and it would be a waste of time.

If you want to use meta, go look at my past games. I have 2 recent town games. Knock yourself out.

In post 7509, skitter30 wrote:lld is absurdly tunneled on someone i'm p sure is town

Yeah but not much to do.

In post 7500, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:big lul about this one

hey you hear that ffery

if you scumread peta it's a scum claim.

yes, i'm saying if fferybork or whoever abruptly pulls a reversal after strongly expressing a townread on me to get me eliminated then it's because they're scum. i don't expect any of them to because anyone who knows me at all knows this is as flagrantly town as i can get but it's possible i have a blind spot somewhere

people w/ skitter experience: is this ATE legit? does she do this as scum to wriggle out of stuff?

-b

In post 7507, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7501, petapan wrote:i think me vote parking you implies i don't really think you're town and no one's trying to talk me down out of it

i don't think i could convince u to come down from that read as much as i can for LLD to come down from her read on u tbh

i feel like i'm a lot more open to reason than her but it's also a moot point becaue she's obviously not going down today and i don't think i am either

In post 7512, petapan wrote:

In post 7500, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:big lul about this one

hey you hear that ffery

if you scumread peta it's a scum claim.

yes, i'm saying if fferybork or whoever abruptly pulls a reversal after strongly expressing a townread on me to get me eliminated then it's because they're scum. i don't expect any of them to because anyone who knows me at all knows this is as flagrantly town as i can get but it's possible i have a blind spot somewhere

peta

this is as flagrantly town as i get

i'm currently turning on my "lld is town" pheremones

i'm definitely town telling and anyone who thinks i'm scum must be scum

i definitely can't turn this on as scum.

definitely.

oh dude i just realized that this whole "look at me i'm doing the town thing" schtick a bunch of you do is just trust telling without being so obvious about it

amazing

i should start doing this more

In post 7513, Deacon Blues wrote:people w/ skitter experience: is this ATE legit? does she do this as scum to wriggle out of stuff?

-b

i dont recall skitter ever AtE tbh

and you can be scum while doing it and say "gotcha"

and still do it

amazing

skitter is too sweet to be mean this was a bit out of character

In post 7517, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7513, Deacon Blues wrote:people w/ skitter experience: is this ATE legit? does she do this as scum to wriggle out of stuff?

-b

i dont recall skitter ever AtE tbh

more to the point do you think this AtE makes her town?

-b

Because I'll admit I'm legitimately concerned about it

-b

In post 7520, Deacon Blues wrote:

In post 7517, Firebringer wrote:

In post 7513, Deacon Blues wrote:people w/ skitter experience: is this ATE legit? does she do this as scum to wriggle out of stuff?

-b

i dont recall skitter ever AtE tbh

more to the point do you think this AtE makes her town?

-b

i think the frustration is real. I don't think the frustration matters as i think she would be frustrated with u either way as i would be if i was mad at u and had to deal with u. So NAI

honestly if this is skitter being mean then I want her in every playerlist i play with until the end of time

-b

that was the meanest she will ever be.