Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:27 am
Vi, I still don't understand why you unvoted, since Ghostlin is in your scum tier.
I just realized something... Isn't reck in this game?
Page 32 of 47
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:31 am
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:31 am
oh nvm he was killed my bad
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 4:57 am
Unvote, vote: 'marble
Vi, with me!
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:31 am
I wanted time to reread.
Wait, you're not following someone else's vote?CES wrote:Vi, with me!
Vote: Llamarble
(L-6)--
Oh, one other thing.
Vi 772 wrote:Immortal Tier
Amrun
Sotty7
That One Tier
Untrod Tripod
Kublai Khan
Quilford
Cogito Ergo Sum
That Other Tier
VP Baltar
jasonT1984
xvart
Scum Tier
Debonair Danny DiPietro
Ghostlin
glowball
Llamarble
jason should probably move up in my 772 list.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:34 am
Forgot to answer Sotty.
I wouldn't be against an xvart wagon.
I wouldn't be against an xvart wagon.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:36 am
Vote: Llama
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:48 am
lol, so if Vi repeats what I've been saying all damn day, it suddenly makes Llama seem scummier. Good to hear my opinion is so valued 'round these parts.
unvote, vote: Llama
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 6:02 am
Erm why am I getting lynched again?
What was so slimy about my posting?
Careful immortal-tiering Sotty; unless she's Towned recently I was a little worried about her.
Pretty sure none of these things are actually scummy and I can provide a hojillion examples of all of them from me-town.
There's time before deadline; don't lynch me till I at least get available to talk again.
What was so slimy about my posting?
Careful immortal-tiering Sotty; unless she's Towned recently I was a little worried about her.
↑ Ghostlin wrote:
The Llamarble case:
1) General uselessness (Fluff, lack of scumhunting).
Posts that indicate this behavior: 139, 200 (mostly the beginning of 200), 223, 340 (mostly a game mechanic that doesn't talk about scumhunting), 453-455 (he mostly explains how he came to the reads without any real analysis), 457, 484 (with this many posts, no wonder you were third), 490 (is really just waving himself around).
2) Lack of explanation on most of his town/scum reads: I've hit this point a lot, but he often will say X is town or Y is scum without really giving a case or much of a reason. Besides 'my ISO', the only reason why I think Llam's voting for me is because he didn't like the reason I voted for him via case. He did claim it was inaccurate, but Sotty, point #1 is the reason I voted for Llam in the first place. (Particularly since he listed me as a town read end of Day 1).
3) Excessive use of one or more of the following phrases, 'more to come', 'I'll do a deepread', etc. This is forgivable if he coughs up the goods, but yesterday he waited until the 11th hour to post a town/scum list. He never goes into detail why he suspects the way he does; and his case on me was really 'I guess I better have a case on Ghostlin. 'His ISO', and OMGUS.
4) I don't like #654. You can argue about meta until the cows come home, but it reads as an excuse to shift his vote off of VP onto a more poplous wagon.
5) #656 has either an associative tell with no reasoning or calling out three players as scum for no reason.
Pretty sure none of these things are actually scummy and I can provide a hojillion examples of all of them from me-town.
There's time before deadline; don't lynch me till I at least get available to talk again.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 6:05 am
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:13 am
↑ Llamarble wrote:Erm why am I getting lynched again?
What was so slimy about my posting?
Careful immortal-tiering Sotty; unless she's Towned recently I was a little worried about her.
Pretty sure none of these things are actually scummy and I can provide a hojillion examples of all of them from me-town.
There's time before deadline; don't lynch me till I at least get available to talk again.
Yeah, going to follow my case now that town's decided this direction. This glorified proddodge cements what I was saying.
Unvote, Vote: Llam
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:26 am
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 8:35 am
That was a prod-response, not a prod-dodge.
Anyway, I said I don't have much time right now.
Nobody has actually called anything I've done scummy, they just have said I haven't done enough.
I drove from Chicago to DC Tuesday, was at the White House / Capitol Wednesday, Drove to NYC yesterday, and now I'm here. I should have a little time today but I haven't yet.
Anyway, I said I don't have much time right now.
Nobody has actually called anything I've done scummy, they just have said I haven't done enough.
I drove from Chicago to DC Tuesday, was at the White House / Capitol Wednesday, Drove to NYC yesterday, and now I'm here. I should have a little time today but I haven't yet.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:12 am
I reread VP / Xvart / Ghostlin. All I can say about them is HOLY BALLS ALL THREE NEED TO DIE.
If you people leave any of them alive to endgame there will be ANGER (well, assuming they flip scum. I'm always happy to be ignored when I'm wrong. They will flip scum though.). I'm okay with my 11 win streak ending because I played bad, but I'll be disappointed if I get lynched while I don't even have proper access and then the town fails to eliminate the scums I found for them.
If you people leave any of them alive to endgame there will be ANGER (well, assuming they flip scum. I'm always happy to be ignored when I'm wrong. They will flip scum though.). I'm okay with my 11 win streak ending because I played bad, but I'll be disappointed if I get lynched while I don't even have proper access and then the town fails to eliminate the scums I found for them.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:25 am
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:30 am
I didn't have a particular pair of balls in mind, though a wise man running for office once used his balls as a platform for the election, saying we could hide behind them in the event of nuclear attack and such. That seems like a good pair.
I reread them because they were my top scumreads. A lot of the time when I reread scumreads I get second thoughts, but this time that didn't happen.
I reread them because they were my top scumreads. A lot of the time when I reread scumreads I get second thoughts, but this time that didn't happen.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:31 am
I didn't have a particular pair of balls in mind, though a wise man running for office once used his balls as a platform for the election, saying we could hide behind them in the event of nuclear attack and such. That seems like a good pair.
I reread them because they were my top scumreads. A lot of the time when I reread scumreads I get second thoughts, but this time that didn't happen.
I reread them because they were my top scumreads. A lot of the time when I reread scumreads I get second thoughts, but this time that didn't happen.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:36 pm
Wait.. what? I get sick for a couple of days and come back to see my Ghostlin wagon decimated in favor of a Llamarble wagon?
And it looks like Llamarble is conceding without any kind of claim? Well... shit. That's a scum-tell in itself.
I'm not totally happy with this turn of events. I think there are better lynches for today.
And it looks like Llamarble is conceding without any kind of claim? Well... shit. That's a scum-tell in itself.
I'm not totally happy with this turn of events. I think there are better lynches for today.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 1:56 pm
You really are trying to say that I'm misrepping what when down when I just illustrated exactly how wrong you are? The "push" jason put on Llamarble consisted of
- asking for a proper case; and,
- talks about how high post count doesn't mean anything.
But my point still stands because f you were to read jason's ISO without knowing anything about the game and with all his votes removed I cannot believe anyone would actually think he was voting Llamarble over glowball. The difference in stated suspicion and intent is obviously favored towards glowball by a wide margin.
Well compared to your reasons for thinking jason are scum (one post gut read, not posting, etc.) I would say that I have a less shitcase than you do. Speaking of your read on jason, while looking through your ISO to see why you have a varying level of suspicion on jason I would some interesting things. You had a gut scum read on his first post. You then further explain your first vote as a gut scum read. You then ask Amrun to consider lynching Llamarble over jason. Then you call jason wrongtown. Then you ask ghostlin why he is voting Llamarble over Amrun/CES/jason. Then you come back and confirm you are suspicious of jason. That is certainly a lot of dancing around voting jason if I've ever seen it.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 2:08 pm
Less posturing please.↑ Kublai Khan wrote:Wait.. what? I get sick for a couple of days and come back to see my Ghostlin wagon decimated in favor of a Llamarble wagon?
And it looks like Llamarble is conceding without any kind of claim? Well... shit. That's a scum-tell in itself.
I'm not totally happy with this turn of events. I think there are better lynches for today.
xvart is doing :awesome: at not pretending to participate beyond his own sideshow.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 2:37 pm
I'm not posturing. Since Roxi is assumed to be the hammering vote, I'm prodding him for a roleclaim. This is a role madness game, so there's no reason for him to be giving up like a VT.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 2:38 pm
Mmkay so should Llam turn out to be town, Vi deserves death.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 2:44 pm
I'm more talking about:↑ Kublai Khan wrote:I'm not posturing. Since Roxi is assumed to be the hammering vote, I'm prodding him for a roleclaim. This is a role madness game, so there's no reason for him to be giving up like a VT.
Don't say "there are better lynches" without advertising them.KK 794 wrote:I'm not totally happy with this turn of events. I think there are better lynches for today.
...For calling you scum? ...For suggesting that I could go from one wagon you weren't on to other wagons you also aren't on? ...For not being on your scumteam?glowball 796 wrote:Mmkay so should Llam turn out to be town, Vi deserves death.
I only get three guesses.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 2:45 pm
Reading.
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 2:49 pm