Page 32 of 72
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:17 am
by Mario4
In post 772, Marquis wrote:Because he knows notscience and I are both town and pasted a town perspective to the end of that? It's much too easy of a slip but it's one I really would like to be true.
VOTE: Mario4
As far as I'm concerned, one of notscience and Mario4 is scum. I'm leaning notscience just because he's too composed for my liking this game, but for now I'm with Nacho.
lol what this logic is terrible right here. It helps us because if we are not sure if they are scum or not we don't lynch a town.
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:18 am
by Mario4
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:28 am
by Nachomamma8
I like the increased activity today! Where was this yesterday?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 11:34 am
by Mario4
Me? I was trying to get caught up and ive been really busy irl.
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:11 pm
by Marcrell
In post 775, Mario4 wrote: In post 772, Marquis wrote:Because he knows notscience and I are both town and pasted a town perspective to the end of that? It's much too easy of a slip but it's one I really would like to be true.
VOTE: Mario4
As far as I'm concerned, one of notscience and Mario4 is scum. I'm leaning notscience just because he's too composed for my liking this game, but for now I'm with Nacho.
lol what this logic is terrible right here. It helps us because if we are not sure if they are scum or not we don't lynch a town.
We're never 100% sure and we have ni investigative role in this game we never will be. Lynching gives us much needed information in how their reads stack up with their roles and how other's reads of them fit in.
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 1:30 pm
by bubbajack8
In post 742, Sakura Hana wrote:I'll be looking heavily at the people that forced a no lynch
(notscience, SoS, bubba)
In post 749, BROseidon wrote:Final Vote Count 1.11:
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch
Mario4 – Nachomamma8, Neonizer
Sound of Silence –
notscience
notscience –
bubbajack8
, Marquis,
Sakura Hana
, BoroPhil, Marcrell, Dry-Fit
Marquis – startfromtheheart, Dry-Fit, Mario4,
Sound of Sielence
Not voting: Ms Marangal, Marcrell
Day 1 ends in a NO-LYNCH
Flavor:
The bros stood around, drunkenly pointing fingers at one another. They could not resolve to expel any from the group, and they switched back and forth among whom they thought to be the killers. Each felt the weight of the beery stupor, and as the sun rose, they felt the grasp of sleep slowly encompass them. Each wandered drunkenly upstairs to a couch, where they could pass out, waiting for the afternoon. The hangover would be brutal...
Three oh so tricky ones, however, had tricked them all. They had taken Berocca, and were waiting for the others to pass out to strike.
Deadline is in
(expired on 2013-11-09 22:51:45). Anyone with night actions has until then to submit them.
The only player who really forced a NL was Not, neo, nacho, mrs mangal, and marcell. There were 2 wagons they could have joined. The fact you posted this 3 people seems VERY forced.
VOTE: Sakura
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 2:50 pm
by notscience
Nacho do you want my vote
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 3:56 pm
by Sakura Hana
Actually I didn't realize you were voting ns since before. Tbf ns forced a no lynch by voting SoS and then leaving like "screw deadline"
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:02 pm
by notscience
lol, it's called sleep deprivation
It tends to cause people to fall asleep on themselves
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 4:13 pm
by Sakura Hana
So ns, what are you doing this game?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 5:24 pm
by notscience
Apparently deathtunneling.
You?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:15 pm
by Sakura Hana
I'm voting scum.
Deathtunneling on who?
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:18 pm
by Ms Marangal
What?
I swear I was on Marquis before deadline had hit, I had put my vote there as a compromise
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:26 pm
by Ms Marangal
In post 732, Marquis wrote:Mara if you're town you should be able to read the meta here and if you're scum then here's your chance to bus for towncred.
this is shitty, and a really weird appeal
In post 772, Marquis wrote:Because he knows notscience and I are both town and pasted a town perspective to the end of that? It's much too easy of a slip but it's one I really would like to be true.
VOTE: Mario4
As far as I'm concerned, one of notscience and Mario4 is scum. I'm leaning notscience just because he's too composed for my liking this game, but for now I'm with Nacho.
and then he posts this as a possible explanation as to why Mario said what he said?
I've explained this, when Ffery asked
but then, I rarely like Nacho and Ffery can read him better than I can. Her being dead, and flipping town is enough for me to leave him alone for the time being.
VOTE: Marquis
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:29 pm
by Ms Marangal
In post 762, Mario4 wrote:Can someone explain to me why nobody was lynched? I am really confused
In post 764, Mario4 wrote:i still don't get it, why wouldnt notscience have been lynched since he has the most votes on him?
In post 767, Mario4 wrote:I don't get why thats the rules. Every time i have played this game you don't need a majority you just need one guy with the most votes. but whatever I guess it technically helps us out.
if Notsci is scum, I can't see these sequences of posts coming from scum
I can't really see them coming from scum, even if notsci was town
this reeks of genuine confusion
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:59 pm
by Ms Marangal
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 9:24 pm
by Nachomamma8
Sure.
In post 789, Ms Marangal wrote:if Notsci is scum, I can't see these sequences of posts coming from scum
I can't really see them coming from scum, even if notsci was town
this reeks of genuine confusion
He's probably genuinely confused, yeah. I don't see why that makes him town.
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:03 pm
by Neonizer
I like the lists of people causing a NL. Don't forget with less than a day to go there was a wagon on mario which built up and I wasn't on after that.
Surely those trying to change the lynch with less than a day are just as responsible.
Phil why do you think me and bubba re scummy? you never really explain anything
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 1:47 am
by Marcrell
In post 789, Ms Marangal wrote: In post 762, Mario4 wrote:Can someone explain to me why nobody was lynched? I am really confused
In post 764, Mario4 wrote:i still don't get it, why wouldnt notscience have been lynched since he has the most votes on him?
In post 767, Mario4 wrote:I don't get why thats the rules. Every time i have played this game you don't need a majority you just need one guy with the most votes. but whatever I guess it technically helps us out.
if Notsci is scum, I can't see these sequences of posts coming from scum
I can't really see them coming from scum, even if notsci was town
this reeks of genuine confusion
They can look that way. Someone who was hopelessly confused early on in my last game turned out to be scum flying under the radar the whole time. It could go both ways as being confused happens regardless of alignment.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 4:55 am
by Dry-fit
Marcrell when are you going to do some actual scumhunting in this game?
Activity actually wasn't bad yesterday, especially near the end. We just had chuckleheads like Boro and ns who didn't show any awareness about deadline at all.
I blame Boro for this more than anyone. His play in general has been scummy as well.
Vote: BoroPhil.
Marquis is still also probably scum.
notscience wrote:Apparently deathtunneling.
Sound of Silence is dead now. You need a new strategy.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:33 am
by bubbajack8
In post 782, Sakura Hana wrote:
Actually I didn't realize you were voting ns since before. Tbf ns forced a no lynch by voting SoS and then leaving like "screw deadline"
Which makes it seem more forced. You thought that me, sos, and not were "forcing a nl" When in reality you failed to check. NS I understand. Me and SOS were on wagons that actually could have gone somewhere.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 5:46 am
by Sakura Hana
In post 795, bubbajack8 wrote: In post 782, Sakura Hana wrote:
Actually I didn't realize you were voting ns since before. Tbf ns forced a no lynch by voting SoS and then leaving like "screw deadline"
Which makes it seem more forced. You thought that me, sos, and not were "forcing a nl" When in reality you failed to check. NS I understand. Me and SOS were on wagons that actually could have gone somewhere.
If anything YOUR statements feel like they are following some sort of scum agenda, you yourself said yesterday that it was better to no lynch than lynch town, which means you wanted to force a no lynch on purpose. According to this post:
And then after deadline had expired, you post something like this because you messed up and wanted to look more town:
Which is funny how you telegraphed your own scum agenda with your RVS Vote:
Unvote
Vote: bubba
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:45 am
by BoroPhil
neo, try reading back through the thread, I've explained my reasons for you, bubba and start. that's why you are my top three and possibly bar not I can't really see my vote moving elsewhere today.
What, you aren't reading the thead properly because you are scum? Oh, sorry about that.
not sure what Dry's game is, and whilst I think I admitted I was a bit surprised by the deadline arrival, I actually tried to get a lynch on someone I wasn't convinced on (notscience) to try and stop a no lynch. So, your vote is frankly baffling.
I think you are town, but town having a bad game. I suggest you have another think and try and improve.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:08 pm
by Neonizer
In post 549, BoroPhil wrote:quick reads
leaning scum
notiscience
start
bubba
Null
Marcrell
Mario
Regina
neo
leaning town
Dry
nacho
Marangal
Sakura
ETL
In post 619, BoroPhil wrote:and of the people on it, I'd say neonizer is the most likely scum. there is time for a counter wagon.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: neonizer
In post 757, BoroPhil wrote:trying to be friendly now start? I still think you are scummy.
not as much as bubba or neonizer though granted.
not sure on notscience, and I wonder if SoS now regrets not hammering? certainly potential for a good double-bluff there?
In post 797, BoroPhil wrote:neo, try reading back through the thread, I've explained my reasons for you, bubba and start. that's why you are my top three and possibly bar not I can't really see my vote moving elsewhere today.
What, you aren't reading the thead properly because you are scum? Oh, sorry about that.
not sure what Dry's game is, and whilst I think I admitted I was a bit surprised by the deadline arrival, I actually tried to get a lynch on someone I wasn't convinced on (notscience) to try and stop a no lynch. So, your vote is frankly baffling.
I think you are town, but town having a bad game. I suggest you have another think and try and improve.
These are all posts mentioning me. Its not really informative of why you think I am scum. Just lots of name dropping. Putting my name in there with bubba. couple of votes but with no reasoning other than scum. So yer call that explaining reasoning I think not?
seems like you are trying to attach us together incase you get lynched, I get looked at.
Thers a little bit more on bubba but not a whole lot. So maybe you are saying stuff in your head and thinking you've explained it.
Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:10 pm
by Neonizer
In fact I see no reason at all in any of those posts. The closest you get is 'most likely scum'