@Pere - You're voting Smargaret - why, did that vote come brand new to you and with new info from the flips?
Please.
@TSO - pretty weak reasoning, why do you think Pere leaped with you particularly...and again?
Do you think he's town?
@Antihero - Meh, okay, but I see town make ludicrous connection cases all the time, what's so scummy about it besides lacking logic? It's not like I wouldn't expect BRO to do that sort of case, it seems in line for him, am I missing something?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:07 am
by T S O
In post 775, Thor665 wrote:
@TSO - pretty weak reasoning, why do you think Pere leaped with you particularly...and again?
Weak reasoning is hmm. I think his jump is ...wait, it's completely natural, because he's been pushing smargaret since ages.
I don't remember anything the slot's done all game, which is bad. Even in a game like this where I'm not super tryharding, I should still have *some* impression of the slot.
I'm going to reread the game soonish to try to get better grounding. I haven't gotten too invested in this one yet.
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 1:52 pm
by BROseidon
My main issue with the Yates kill (and also to a degree with the Porkens kill) is why Thor hasn't been shot yet.
I still can't decide if it's funnier or sadder that I can do these things and know they will happen.
I am amused that I now get to link to them when they do just for lulz though.
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 5:09 pm
by BROseidon
Which explains why I voted for you right out the gate.
Instead of, y'know, town reading you and ascribing other reasons to you not getting shot
In post 788, PeregrineV wrote:Considering I figured Cxin was town and you thought he was scum, your information was updated.
I had Yates as a null read, what was your read on him? Was it updated?
I had you or him as scum.
I had Yates as town.
Thankfully the flips totally rearranged my world.
I never got that you considered him town the way you argued with him. Do you state that anywhere?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:26 am
by BROseidon
Thor, y u no reply to me
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:57 pm
by Thor665
In post 790, PeregrineV wrote:I never got that you considered him town the way you argued with him. Do you state that anywhere?
No. Neither do I state him as a scum read except in relation to a Cxin scum flip.
I also always spend a lot of time talking about reads with people without calling them scummy when I'm scumreading hem </sarcasm>
In post 790, PeregrineV wrote:I never got that you considered him town the way you argued with him. Do you state that anywhere?
No. Neither do I state him as a scum read except in relation to a Cxin scum flip.
I also always spend a lot of time talking about reads with people without calling them scummy when I'm scumreading hem </sarcasm>
This is terrible reasoning. No, you aren't Smudger, but you got the same role pm.
TSO - Gut is a horrible reason to vote someone on Day 3. Horrible.
Why are people voting Broseidon again?
VOTE: Peregrine - but I'm going to reread Antihero/Smudger tonight, because I also don't remember anything particularly memorable out of that slot, and that may change my vote.
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:21 am
by Antihero
In post 787, PeregrineV wrote:I'm merely pointing out the link. Not sure why you are getting so defensive about it.
because you're
of
fensive. that's why
smargaret wrote:This is terrible reasoning. No, you aren't Smudger, but you got the same role pm.
i think you're misplacing the burden of proof, marge
so you're agreeing with the nk analysis or not?
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:41 am
by jasonT1981
I am force replacing Yiley. His activity is the main factor in this. This would have been his 3rd prod. Though I operate a 4 in total or 3 in one day rule, there is no evidence Yiley has interest in this game.
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:23 am
by penguin_alien
Antihero, do you think that when a slot is replaced none of the previous occupants' previous posts are relevant in reading them?
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:38 am
by Antihero
holy shit, what is this, strawman hour?
i point out how stupid it is that NK analysis based on a self-described weak read is stupid and now i'm getting irrelevant questions about ^ this
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:39 am
by Antihero
but i guess the scum smoke generator has to keep on going, so whatever
