Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:52 am
Titus, why did you vote loha again?
Page 32 of 43
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:52 am
Like Im having trouble fully understanding why you did
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:14 pm
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:15 pm
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:16 pm
Quotes were excatly what I was looking for. I just saw some jump.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:18 pm
Tell you what I'll even be the nice person for a moment.
If Titus is that great at finding scum with one post and is town I will totally eat crap and nominate her for paragon of Mafia hunter
If Titus is that great at finding scum with one post and is town I will totally eat crap and nominate her for paragon of Mafia hunter
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:19 pm
Ego.
Case was fine. It got people to lynch Loha obvscum. Rather than just saying I am weak because you disagree, you never think I could be right.
You thought the Ocean Persivul case was weak in Blitz One too. Ever consider that you're just dismissing facts as weak?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:22 pm
Titus case:
post she is harping about
↑ Titus wrote:VOTE: Loha
Aquanum and Yakko would the next pick.
Loha votes me for reasons that aren't clear. The only thing I said was I needed a counter to itep to get things going. That indicates not much is alignment indicative.
Loha sheeps that thought process, but votes me. If he thinks my thought process is scummy, why would he follow it? If he doesn't, then why is he voting me?
All around, that's pretty bad. If I am right, itepip is almost certainly town.
↑ Titus wrote:@farside, cause it's not. The only thing that vote did was eliminate itpip and Lola as buddies.
You can quibble my use of the word buddying, but Loha voting me for reasons he agreed with is rather scummy.
Voting a survival wagon isn't scummy. It's natural instinct unless ipip was explicitly town reading Loha. I didn't see that.
post she is harping about
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:22 pm
Was anybody on the LoHa wagon there because of Titus' case? Hands up.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:23 pm
You never made a case on persivul first off and second not even in the same category.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:26 pm
↑ itlepip wrote:↑ hi im Yakko wrote:The vote from pip. Opportunistic as fuck. I like it even more now. Go ahead and hang him.
I 100% accept this, but it doesn't mean that LoHa isn't scum.
↑ itlepip wrote:TLDR: Titus is a god and you should just give in and follow whatever she says, because if she is town we will win and if she is scum the game is already over...
Dangit, I was liking Titus's defense of me.
Also not a fan of pisskops pings that seem to just be following the aqua-farside-yakko groupthink.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:28 pm
↑ farside22 wrote:
You never made a case on persivul first off and second not even in the same category.
I didn't wall Persivul but I laid out why he was scum a lot. Don't need a wall to have a strong case.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:28 pm
Scum is 100% in Aqua, Pisskop, Yakko.
Take the bet Farside?
Take the bet Farside?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:32 pm
↑ Titus wrote:↑ itlepip wrote:↑ hi im Yakko wrote:The vote from pip. Opportunistic as fuck. I like it even more now. Go ahead and hang him.
I 100% accept this, but it doesn't mean that LoHa isn't scum.
↑ itlepip wrote:TLDR: Titus is a god and you should just give in and follow whatever she says, because if she is town we will win and if she is scum the game is already over...
Dangit, I was liking Titus's defense of me
Also not a fan of pisskops pings that seem to just be following the aqua-farside-yakko groupthink.
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that was sarcasm.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:36 pm
Oh also, from the site rules:
Can we not go here?
Do not bring outside influences into the game - this includes threats, bribes,>>> wagers, promises <<<, "trust tells", alliances, etc. Using knowledge from previous games is perfectly acceptable, but try not to carry grudges from one game to another.
Can we not go here?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:40 pm
↑ Aquanim wrote:Oh also, from the site rules:
Do not bring outside influences into the game - this includes threats, bribes,>>> wagers, promises <<<, "trust tells", alliances, etc. Using knowledge from previous games is perfectly acceptable, but try not to carry grudges from one game to another.
Can we not go here?
Fine.
Takes back word on it.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:41 pm
Still say Titus is scum though
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:43 pm
Deadline is at (expired on 2015-11-21 21:30:00).
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:44 pm
↑ Titus wrote:↑ farside22 wrote:
You never made a case on persivul first off and second not even in the same category.
I didn't wall Persivul but I laid out why he was scum a lot. Don't need a wall to have a strong case.
Yeah that's why you asked me why he was scum that game.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:53 pm
If you're town titus I am dissapoint.
I do think that if the vig claims now we can simply create a list and go down it.
I do think that if the vig claims now we can simply create a list and go down it.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:00 pm
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:05 pm
TITUS, WHY AM I BUTTHURT? OVER WHAT? WHY ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT NONSENSE AND BETS WHEN YOU FLAT OUT IGNORE HONEST QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS?
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:10 pm
Cuz you won't vote scum when I'm proven right/smart. By your logic when I bus, I bus hard, which means scum are in my pool anyway.
You aren't putting honest questions but raving like a lunatic.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:14 pm
Have you rtead
get out of here.
anyything
youve posted?get out of here.
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 1:15 pm
''right/smart''? How? You made a vote some of us consider sketchy on obvscum.