Mafiascum.net

In post 567, skitter30 wrote:

In post 517, The Dark Wanderer wrote:@northsidegal I have heard that your favorite month is december. I would be interested in finishing this game before that month and you showing up to thread and helping to conclude this game would help with that.

why is this townie to you?

In post 574, skitter30 wrote: i mean when i read it i thought it was nai, maybe a little buddying-y but he'd been townreading you the whole time so it felt kinda in-line with how he'd been approaching you the whole game

skitter, why did you ask me this question and say this? you already had TDW in your coalition, so i don't understand the mindset behind these posts - and if you just wanted to hear my reasoning for the post being towny, why?

I can take you at your word on Raya36 town.

I'm still unsure of who in the remaining 5 I would want to add to the coalition but I'd speedlynch them if the coalition failed.

In post 769, YurikoJasmine wrote:checking in. re-reading (on page 18 right now so a long way to go... gosh you guys really like talking on weekends)

so, uh, are we going to get your thoughts on recent happenings?

In post 773, northsidegal wrote:probably doesn't actually mean much but i actually think NM's play so far has been scum indicative

? why

bleargabl pagetop

i wos watchin jeppardy....

In post 775, northsidegal wrote:

In post 567, skitter30 wrote:

In post 517, The Dark Wanderer wrote:@northsidegal I have heard that your favorite month is december. I would be interested in finishing this game before that month and you showing up to thread and helping to conclude this game would help with that.

why is this townie to you?

In post 574, skitter30 wrote: i mean when i read it i thought it was nai, maybe a little buddying-y but he'd been townreading you the whole time so it felt kinda in-line with how he'd been approaching you the whole game

skitter, why did you ask me this question and say this? you already had TDW in your coalition, so i don't understand the mindset behind these posts - and if you just wanted to hear my reasoning for the post being towny, why?

cuz i was reading it as nai and you mentioned townreading it two or three seperate times in a short period of time so i could tell you felt strongly about it and so i was wondering what you were getting out of a post i read as nai

Raya36
Gamma Emerald
DVa
YurikoJasmine

The Dark Wanderer, Not_Mafia, northsidegal, probs a robot, skitter30



[/area]

HURT: not_maifa
HEAL: Raya36

for now

not at all a fan of not_mafia popping in then not posting at all.

Yeah I think I agree. I had a bit of a spat with N_M in my last game with him so I didn't want to come at him out of the gate, but I feel like in my last game he was shitposting and making jokey reads and coming up with nicknames, whereas here he's just done a wolfy pop-in and then popped out.

I don't know that "total disengagement" is reliably scum-indicative but I don't think I right now have a better candidate for scum than N_M.

VOTE: Not_Mafia

Thread seems to be stalling again and my 'WIM' has kinda dropped honestly.

Sorry for going quiet. I need to reengage with skitter when I am less preoccupied with finding the MEANING OF LIFE.

Completing the first day phase with a policy lynch of Not_Mafia in case of coalition failure is a good idea.

In post 784, DVa wrote:whereas here he's just done a wolfy pop-in and then popped out.

i think i've seen him do this as town and as scum tho

In post 785, probs a robot wrote:Completing the first day phase with a policy lynch of Not_Mafia in case of coalition failure is a good idea.

do you want him in the coalition?

also

i believe theoretically the correct course is to lynch from within the coalition given a coalition failure although

i know but i don't want him in it in the first place

just to make sure:
we vote on the coalition first, and if it fails we can vote on a lynch later, right?

(ie selecting a coalition doesn't end the day?)

me neither

i think i was going to follow that thought with some other statement but i just ended up not doing that.

the game would be radically different if day 1 ended upon the coalition vote and i'm pretty sure schadd hasn't changed it like that - as far as i remember the only change he made was that lynches can't be hammered before a coalition is met

yeah i'm pretty sure the day doesn't end but i'm just checking; there was some confusion over it last time and the coalition won the game anyways so the rest of the day didn't play out

In post 788, skitter30 wrote:i know but i don't want him in it in the first place

i feel like if he's town having him in it and it fails makes him an *incredibly* easy mis-lynch

Yeah... That one was what some humans refer to as a "blonde moment"

when you're around lmk so that we can talk
i wanna try to resort you now that i know who you are

and i want to hear more about your not-scumread on me

I need a few days. It will be before the end of this phase (working around your weekend v/la)

cool cool
i'm going to be around a little less this weekend btw because of thanksgiving and friends coming from out of town

In post 789, skitter30 wrote:

@schadd

just to make sure:
we vote on the coalition first, and if it fails we can vote on a lynch later, right?

(ie selecting a coalition doesn't end the day?)

yup! specifically, the rule is that a majority lynch cannot be achieved before a coalition majority. in the event that a majority of votes existed for a lynch, and then a failed coalition majority occurred, the lynch majority person would immediately explode in a fireball.

Rather than exploding into a fireball, may I suggest the insertion of deadly toxins into the chosen lynch candidate?
According to my sources, this is a substantially more controlled and effective way to cause the cessation of a human life. ^_^

Though I have not studied this at length of course.