Page 32 of 44

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:24 pm
by northsidegal
Image
Votecount 3.5
Image



no lunch (3):
OkaPoka , Aubrey , u r a person 2
u r a person 2 (1):
Slaxx
OkaPoka (1):
no lunch

Not voting (2):
Gamma Emerald, brassherald

With 7 alive, it’s 4 to lynch. The Day 3 deadline is in (expired on 2019-01-29 20:07:59).

Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:30 pm
by Aubrey
In post 770, Slaxx wrote:Okay, funny joke

What if I just wanted to forget the last week and we just lynch Aubrey again
Or how about we lynch in that god awful Shoshin wagon from the other day?

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:15 am
by brassherald
On reread, I thought URAP2 replaced in, was wrong about what slot he was. Has been good before Day 3. Not a good lynch, glad I unvoted because it was a case of mistaken identity. Gamma, who was the one who replaced into the slot I was thinking he was is townie for different reasons.

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:17 am
by brassherald
VOTE: OkaPoka

I don't like him peddling his vote, and he's been doing it for a while. Anyone else pinged by this?

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:11 am
by OkaPoka
What's wrong with that?

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:15 am
by brassherald
In post 779, OkaPoka wrote:What's wrong with that?
How is it pro town to remove your own voice? In your book, you are the only one who should be 100% town, why would you even risk giving your vote away when the person you are handing it to might be scum?

Are your reads so bad that you don't trust yourself?

Or, are you just trying to buddy up to someone?

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:16 am
by brassherald
Oh, third option, you want to continue to mislynch but also retain plausible deniability.

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:29 am
by u r a person 2
@BH Fmpov, oka is only scum with you, slaxx, and gamma because I doubt they are the FB, and they have shown willingness to keep aubrey and nl at l-1

I'm town reading you, so I don't want that lynch, but slaxx and gamma are both in my lynch pool today.

If we're going to lynch oka, why not gamma or slaxx instead?

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:31 am
by OkaPoka
I'll take double vote today and have no vote tomorrow

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:33 am
by u r a person 2
Also, unless someone makes a good case for

who oka is with

and/or

how oka's play is persuing their scum strat

ya'll are going to have to get this lynch without me

because I'm pretty deep in the town!oka rabbit hole atm

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:37 am
by u r a person 2
If ya'll want to lynch oka because you're worried about (oka, U2), I guess I understand, but this lynch is worse than shoshin

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:37 am
by u r a person 2
actually, no, I don't. If you think it's (oka, u2) you should lynch me because I'm FB 100% of the time in that team.

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:01 am
by u r a person 2
In post 764, no lunch wrote:VOTE: OkaPoka
#1 preferred lynch by far if this is supported.
So we're just going to ignore every question I posed to you

okay

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:03 am
by Slaxx
Leroy Jenkins

VOTE: No Lunch

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:05 am
by Slaxx
If anyone’s curious,

Refusal to address U2’s questioning while pushing other viable lynches.

Bold strategy let’s see if it works.

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:08 am
by u r a person 2
good vote

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:10 am
by Slaxx
Gamma is a terrible lynch, I think.

I always have the hardest time reading her but usually it’s a scumread on town. I never townread Gamma and I am so I’m running with it.

Why Gamma?

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:13 am
by brassherald
I have a pretty good history of reading Gamma. Definitely on the town side of things in my book.

Tone's a big part of the read, but this game has seemed like town tone.

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:14 am
by u r a person 2
If you can find a town!BH, he's really the one to sheep on gamma, I imagine. I should probably do that, as well.

@BH I don't actually know what your read on gamma is. Whatcha got?

But my read on gamma is because I just don't see any will to solve the game and push her perspective.

I want to see the flip and evaluate it before going too much further

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:14 am
by u r a person 2
nm

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:09 am
by no lunch
In post 778, brassherald wrote:VOTE: OkaPoka

I don't like him peddling his vote, and he's been doing it for a while. Anyone else pinged by this?
Yes. He stopped looking like he was trying to solve a fair while ago.

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:10 am
by no lunch
In post 787, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 764, no lunch wrote:VOTE: OkaPoka
#1 preferred lynch by far if this is supported.
So we're just going to ignore every question I posed to you

okay
I didn't think I ignored anything.

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:15 am
by northsidegal
-

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:15 am
by northsidegal
-

Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 11:15 am
by northsidegal
-