Page 32 of 189

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:35 am
by Chara
@mod: i'll be v/la friday and saturday.

i'll still be here tonight.

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:37 am
by Enter
In post 774, xRECKONERx wrote:
In post 766, Enter wrote:Reck I would love to bring back Lynch all lurkers, lynch qll liars, lynch all sled voters, but not this game. Look at NMSA. Point out a post that makes him town
that's not how burden of fucking proof works

chances are, he's town
it's on the CHORUS OF PEOPLE SCREAMING THAT HE'S SCUM to present a compelling case, which absolutely ZERO of you have done
Turns out it goes both ways. The only argument for him being scum is resistance which there's a surprise large amount of for this to be a solid argument.

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:38 am
by Ankamius
resistance to a scum wagon is not indicative of the wagonee being scum

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:38 am
by xRECKONERx
uhhh no. that's not how it works.

let me show you a really cool object lesson to help you understand:

You guys: NMSA IS SCUM
Me: what why
You guys: AHA DONT YOU SEE THEY WONT AGREE WITH US THEREFORE WE MUST BE RIGHT

now i want you to point me to me in the diagram where this all falls apart from a logic standpoint

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:39 am
by xRECKONERx
if we squint really hard!!!
Image

and put on our thinking caps!!!
Image

i...believe....we can figure it out!!!!!!!!
Image

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:40 am
by u r a person 2
That's not the only argument. The meta argument is good. More importantly,
it's correct.


His reads list is bullshit both because the reasoning is bullshit and because it doesn't jive AT ALL with his inability to make any reads whatsoever as town in his last game.

His questions are easy questions that don't imply any actual thought process about the game

He can't back up his votes with decent reasons, and he had to switch his votes after being called out on his votes and his reads not making any sense

He's fucking scum

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:40 am
by u r a person 2
jesus spoiler that shit if you're going to post giant photos

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:40 am
by xRECKONERx
here's a fun thing you can do at home

stop using meta as the foundation for your case

better yet, stop using it at all

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:41 am
by u r a person 2
or at least make the post amusing

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:42 am
by xRECKONERx
id like to append this to my original object lesson

You guys: NMSA IS SCUM!!!!
Me: why
You guys: BECAUSE META!!!!!
Me: but meta sucks, why else
You guys: BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT AGREEING WITH US!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:42 am
by Ankamius
two games is not enough for a meta read

unless it's blatantly obvious what the personality behind those two games mean that indicate town or scum

even then, it takes a lot more than 2 to be able to meta somebody and call it a good case

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:43 am
by u r a person 2
In post 780, u r a person 2 wrote:His reads list is bullshit both because the reasoning is bullshit and because it doesn't jive AT ALL with his inability to make any reads whatsoever as town in his last game.

His questions are easy questions that don't imply any actual thought process about the game

He can't back up his votes with decent reasons, and he had to switch his votes after being called out on his votes and his reads not making any sense

He's fucking scum

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:43 am
by u r a person 2
In post 786, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 780, u r a person 2 wrote:His reads list is bullshit both because the reasoning is bullshit and because it doesn't jive AT ALL with his inability to make any reads whatsoever as town in his last game.

His questions are easy questions that don't imply any actual thought process about the game

He can't back up his votes with decent reasons, and he had to switch his votes after being called out on his votes and his reads not making any sense

He's fucking scum

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:43 am
by xRECKONERx
In post 765, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: nmsa
wait did flubb hammer

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:44 am
by Ankamius
it's another fake hammer

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:44 am
by xRECKONERx
In post 787, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 786, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 780, u r a person 2 wrote:His reads list is bullshit both because the reasoning is bullshit and because it doesn't jive AT ALL with his inability to make any reads whatsoever as town in his last game.

His questions are easy questions that don't imply any actual thought process about the game

He can't back up his votes with decent reasons, and he had to switch his votes after being called out on his votes and his reads not making any sense

He's fucking scum
hey idk man your first line here is just meta again stated differently

the last two are interesting food for thought but they do NOT match the passionate fervor of this wagon

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:45 am
by xRECKONERx
In post 789, Ankamius wrote:it's another fake hammer
ill tell you hwhat

here's a real one

VOTE: NSMA

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:45 am
by tris
!!!

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:45 am
by u r a person 2
Good Fucking Vote

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:45 am
by Ankamius
scandalous

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:46 am
by Ankamius
does this mean it's time to lynch me for playstyle reasons?

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:46 am
by u r a person 2
I don't know how to use that vote scrubber thing. Can someone do that so I don't have to go back and count votes again

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:47 am
by tris
In post 760, Ankamius wrote:I'm not townreading the fake hammer
Isn't that why you said you townread me?

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:47 am
by xRECKONERx
ank is playing semantics

Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:47 am
by Ankamius
I'm townreading your actions around the fake hammer and what I can deduce about your mindset from it