Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 7:23 pm
Like there are myriads of reasons you keep me alive, some of which i already outlined. And they even go beyond logic. It can be as simple as "I want to endgame Wisdom. We're not killing him."
1) sparing oversoul isn't the key to turning everything around, he's just my strongest townread currently so i'd like to spare him.In post 777, Wisdom wrote:so even if i accept everything else
how is sparing oversoul the key to turning this, in your opinion, bad gamestate, around?
It’s not really a thing at the moment. I kinda gave him a day 1 pass because I know Nachos a really good player that if he’s town will give some results. I’ve been pretty focused on other people. I did see he made a ton of posts that I’ll have to read so that’ll change hopefully soon.In post 742, Wisdom wrote:whats your nacho read
You know, saying your vote is purely for pressure kinda defeats the purpose of a pressure vote.In post 744, Elements wrote:More seriously. To apply more pressure to nacho so they feel like they could be a viable lynch target etc you know how the game works, and because I doubt anyone is going to follow my wisdom vote. At least for now.In post 741, Xayah wrote:Ele how do you get from point A to B? I get that your meta is supposed to be 'flip your stuff around a ton' but. Well I'll let you answer before I lead this somewhere.
In other news, water is wet. I don’t really remember you having any problem with the Rakan or Gin lynch so why this outlook? We should be lynching today for information. We don’t lose if we spared a scum. I really don’t get this outlook. Can you explain it to me more?In post 747, Oversoul wrote:I think sparing is actually the better move than lynching. If we have spared scum already and then lynch a townie we essentially just lose
I don’t remember you really trying to do this. Like, I understand you were afk/busy or whatever. But I don’t recall you trying to push this outlook that much and that’s where I have issue.In post 751, Nachomamma8 wrote:My thought is that the best way to play the game is from a neutral standpoint; you can form a strong towncore by attempting to hunt together and taking a couple shots at the scumteam and getting a ton of information early in the game (and because of the investigative aspect, scum are put in a shit position in having to try to avoid getting TOO much towncred or it fucks them later), which requires slowing down, posting a lot of content early game, engaging and listening to people. That didn't happen.
Then we have this. This is all 100% true and it’s why this route is pretty meh. I guess I have the same question for you that I do oversoul. What’s your feel on Rakan/Ginngie? I would understand this viewpoint if you were hard scumreading some of them, but I think the only one who was sucmreading someone in the group was Mastina. You’re basically saying let us put our blind faith and keep on going. When we can very well kill and be in a fine spot. I’m just confused for the most part.In post 751, Nachomamma8 wrote:I think the pacifist line is the poorest for two reasons. The first is that the scum strategy to play it is remarkably straightforward - kill active people until the game is dead or the voices alive are bad influences. You can fake distance your partners p much all you like because you won't be forced to go through with it, and you don't have to attack townies and deal with righteous fury because you're sparing people and pushing back against momentum usually isn't worth it. Secondly, there are no real chances to reassess. Generally, when I am in a tunnel, it takes a whole lot of work to pull me out of it, but you can push people hard enough where they can produce genuine reactions and everything's all good. However, if I'm townreading scum pretty strongly, it's much harder to pull me out - scum usually don't super fuck up in thread, so the only way I'm able to truly reassess is when my working POE is proven wrong. Pacifist doesn't allow for either of those so we just gotta hope that we didn't fuck up in initial reads and that's it.
Are you really trying to claim that scum you is stubborn enough to take full control of the night kills considering how hard you were lurking? Like if you thought your partner could win you would you let them pick the nightkill or no?In post 759, Nachomamma8 wrote:i felt safe with someone who was calling me scum and shutting me down at every turn?In post 758, Wisdom wrote:unless i was a pacifist supporter so you felt safe
do you really believe that?
As I was GOING to say before SOMEONE decided to lolhammer Nacho and cause the thread to be locked literally five minutes before I could post...In post 781, Wisdom wrote:srsly now?