In post 648, Dolly Parton wrote:You shouldn't be upset that I caught scum. It's unorthodox but it workrd. Letting Jake survive this lynch will just pushbhim into endgame eventually. Who wants to Lylo with Jake this game?
That slot is compromised.
I wouldn't wanna LYLO with Tris either.
Uh. . . This came outta nowhere, why?
This didn't really come out of nowhere, read my ISO
In post 665, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
@Alim - I didnt devote alot of time to talking about you because my read of your slot is mostly null. Its null-town and I was scumreading Sausa so when I was commenting on Jake's readslist I didnt want to communicate that I was scumreading you. I get why it may have confused you, but that was my thought process.
I forgot to mention this last day, but you said I'm null-town but you were also scumreading me?
Billy slot is weird (I haven't reread kcda)
I think you misinterpreted that. I said you were null/town. I was scumreading Sausa, and you were close in proximity to him on Jake's readslist. Because I said I was concerned by the top of the list, I didnt want anyone to incorrectly infer that I was scumreading you.
My lynchpool today: {Billy, tris}
Maybes: {Invis, wake, jake}
When did you start scumreading Tris?
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 12:37 am
by Saladman27
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 12:53 am
by Saladman27
Arkias has requested replacement
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 1:00 am
by ofrhz
zzz I just skimmed sauce’s last two mafia games, and I think he has already demonstrated greater depth of reasoning here than in either of those two games
In post 85, alimdia wrote:I'm saying you voting Jake was opportunistic because you could have voted Lil Uzi Vert for the same reason.
So either you didn't see that Lil also didn't post or you wanted to put another vote on Jake.
fry
I was gonna flip out that you were gonna do the same thing tris did
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 1:21 am
by alimdia
In post 783, ofrhz wrote:zzz I just skimmed sauce’s last two mafia games, and I think he has already demonstrated greater depth of reasoning here than in either of those two games
VOTE: billy
so are you saying sauce is scummy, but you're voting billy?
Walk me through what you were thinking when you posted 576
I didn't catch that, but now scum or town there will be a valid defence ~ ~
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 1:23 am
by alimdia
In post 776, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
I think you misinterpreted that. I said you were null/town. I was scumreading Sausa, and you were close in proximity to him on Jake's readslist. Because I said I was concerned by the top of the list, I didnt want anyone to incorrectly infer that I was scumreading you.
In post 783, ofrhz wrote:zzz I just skimmed sauce’s last two mafia games, and I think he has already demonstrated greater depth of reasoning here than in either of those two games
VOTE: billy
so are you saying sauce is scummy, but you're voting billy?
No, I think Sauce sounds smarter here than he did in his last two mafia games. It makes him more likely town compared to my initial read on him
I wouldn’t call it a strong townread. Let’s see what he says
In post 776, Billy Pilgrim wrote:
I think you misinterpreted that. I said you were null/town. I was scumreading Sausa, and you were close in proximity to him on Jake's readslist. Because I said I was concerned by the top of the list, I didnt want anyone to incorrectly infer that I was scumreading you.
I still have no idea what you're saying
Ok, let me try one last time, then I'm gonna give up.
In the original post, I said that Jake's readslist set me off, mostly because he was only townreading 2 people both of whom were townreading him. At the same time, I was reading Sausarex as kinda scummy, and he was one of the people in Jake's townreads. Given that you were the other person that Jake was townreading and I had you as null town, I commented on that because I thought there was a risk of somebody drawing an improper inference about my read of you since you were in the category that I was commenting on.
Basically, I did it to avoid confusion and it just seems to have created it. So I apologize.
Can someone explain to me how Jake is town? Because I'm not seeing it.
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 2:29 am
by ofrhz
In post 665, Billy Pilgrim wrote:Damnit Dolly, if you're town, you broke this game. I do not understand why the fuck you think it was town motivated to set these ridiculous conditions and then badger people over them. You got evidence of this working even once? You said that scum cant resist, you got any proof of that or just your dogged insistence that that's the case?
This is an overreaction to what dolly did. It feels fake
Also billy was voting for dolly and presumably had her as a scumread of some strength
Why would you get mad at someone’s gameplay if they’re a scumread who was doing dumb things and getting voted?
@Wake - in response to your wall, what the actual fuck was the purpose of your question? You asked me about 491 amd said if I had to choose just one to vote between Dolly, invis, and Jake, who would it be? Well I chose one. And that was 15 posts later at 504. So seriously, what was the purpose of that question? And you said nothing else. I want that read list since you said you were working on it
I feel like this was weirdly aggressive.
I’ve played with billy before - i think this kind of tone is out of character.
——
generally Billy’s posts are pretty towny when he’s town. He has a sort of scumhunting energy that really shines through his posts that I’m not seeing here.
I found his original reasons for voting dolly kind of weak as well.
Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 2:35 am
by ofrhz
Can you scumcase Jake without pointing to “noise” like the self vote out of frustration and joke fake claiming?
I find it hard to believe a new scum player would approach the game in his manner
And underneath the noise, I think he’s trying to gamesolve
