Mafiascum.net

right, wimpo's probably town. it was an overreaction but his tone read as genuine frustration. ank is a great replacement for that slot, she'll get some work done

omnom's frustration at Gjt seemed real, but could come from either alignment i believe. could definitely see scum genuinely frustrated at being scumread/questioned for such bizarre reasons. omnom, could i ask where your me/invis suspicions arise from?

VOTE: Gjt for now

his reaction to looker questioning his real life commitments: i think he'd be a little more outraged as town. his scumhunting on omnom recently and his retort to kanna reads as fake to me

In post 739, joges wrote:

In post 734, Gjt wrote:I would've thought you would have already checked their ISO when you took over. It's not a stupid question, but then if your Scum you wouldn't need to I guess as you would know who is Town and can just call it your own reads

Here's a theory. This is a scum point of view. Why would a town player need to read what their replacement has done? I would think scum replacing in would want to see what kind of BS the previous player in their slot has posted or thought. People lying will care what their spot has said, people not lying will just start from their entrance and go.

Gjt asking this makes me think they have a scum point of view as I feel only scum would want to read the previous player said.

VOTE: Gjt

i'm liking joges more, this seems too nuanced for scum

In post 725, Looker wrote:Do you TR ankamius like you TR wimpy?

i townread the slot, slight town pings from Ank calling omnom town in the way she did it but otherwise nothing on her

In post 745, Ankamius wrote:lmao nomnomnom is town

nice

i know it's slightly contradictory to read this post as town and then question it, but i'm TRing it's tone(?) rather than the read itself. why did you call omnom town after her interaction with gjt? can her frustration not come from scum?

still haven't got round to reading Rex' towngame, i'll try and meta him tomorrow. alting is hard work

In post 775, Nicholai wrote:right, wimpo's probably town. it was an overreaction but his tone read as genuine frustration. ank is a great replacement for that slot, she'll get some work done

omnom's frustration at Gjt seemed real, but could come from either alignment i believe. could definitely see scum genuinely frustrated at being scumread/questioned for such bizarre reasons. omnom, could i ask where your me/invis suspicions arise from?

Explained it earlier: I think joges' vote on sala early on was bad and that pinged me, and you two sheeped that vote so it left me with an even worse impression, so I think there's scum in the trio. I think the follow-up looks worse than joges and since I won't get anything from invis I'm voting you to get a reaction and talk.

also beetlejuice beetlejuice beetlejuice

i'm disliking Gjt and the salsa/omnom slot currently. i got townpings from rex linking me his completed towngame since he seemed eager for me to see and it would make sense for him to be town here then, but otherwise he's still down there until i actually go have a look at it

Unsure how I feel about Gjt by the way. Obviously the reasoning is bad but the fact that I've seen a lot of town players so self centered about what they would do as town and using that to scumhunt (despite that being bad) sounds tonally ok?

Nothing jumped to me about the slot when I skimmed anyway so

You mentioned you were an alt right? Have we played together before Nic?

In post 248, Salamence20 wrote:

In post 242, Wimpy wrote:

In post 231, Invisibility wrote:

In post 206, Wimpy wrote:Mislynch day 1 is actually preferable

no

Yes

VOTE: Wimpy

For worrying about mislynching

In post 250, Salamence20 wrote:He just said hed perfer to mislynch D1.

Wheres the town motivation. Hmm? HMMM?

you think pushing these posts wasn't warranted? the only way he scumreads wimpo there is if he thinks wimpo is scum openly admitting he'd like to mislynch today. i don't see that train of thought as reasonable

wimpo exclaiming mislynching is good for day 1 was likely nai

In post 783, nomnomnom wrote:You mentioned you were an alt right? Have we played together before Nic?

i don't believe we have, amigo

No I was specifically referring to joges' justification which seemed really bad to me and a sort of like "I need to get grips into this game let me make up a reason why" that's the tone I got from that post.

In post 122, joges wrote:

In post 95, Salamence20 wrote:Everyone lurks.

This site is dying

VOTE: Salamence

Seems a good way to make town not care about the game is to lull them to depression with negative insight.

Honestly, this is a stretch, but nothing else has stood out.

Concerning the self vote, it's RVS. And no amount of making it anything more than that will make it more than that.

Then invisibility sheeps that vote and your vote came after and it also felt like a sheep when I skimmed it so that's why I suspect you 3.

In post 149, Nicholai wrote:joges' read sure is weird though, people come up with the craziest ideas of how scum are doing crazy strats like "making town not care about the game to lull them to depression with negative insight." when in reality scum are just trying to appear not scummy 95% of the time

actually, this was my opinion on the joges' post there

Must have skipped that one, you do post a lot

Has your opinion changed then? Besides your reaction to his most recent post that is.

yeah, i've liked him more since then. his flip one me seemed odd when i was a viable wagon if he's scum. his 1v1 invitation on Leafy was towny, and i like his annoyance at Wimpo yet setting that apart and displaying the logic he uses in 605 where he suggests scum!wimpo has no reason to be so abrasive/antagonistic

555 seemed off and his nitpicking on fuzzy's 597 felt unnecessary and something scum!him could do to look active

overall fine

I see. How about Invis, any insights?

pedit: That only works until people understand your meta

In post 776, Nicholai wrote:VOTE: Gjt for now

his reaction to looker questioning his real life commitments: i think he'd be a little more outraged as town. his scumhunting on omnom recently and his retort to kanna reads as fake to me

Why would I be outraged? That is some weird logic. I don't really care if I'm beleived in regards to real life or not, not like I know anyone or can prove it.

I'm just here to play the game, gave a brief explanation for my absence also mentioned it couple days earlier as a courtesy heads up. I'm more concerned about being beleived to be Town aligned and not get into petty arguments or real life defenses with people I don't know online .

lolrandom town comes to mind but let's look through his ISO

i like 85, 125 is terrible, his progression on bob is weird where he calls him bad town because he's new or scum 339, but then switches off him after finding out he's not actually new 342 344. 699 feels off. 703 is bad, i don't think it's valid to TR rex based on the number of people disliking his posts at this point, content/context matters. i do like his progression on wimpo, being unsure until eventually thinking genuine in 717

a lot of his ISO is fluff/naked reads and it's hard to tell. someone with my meta with him should enlighten me. overall, a scumlean after that

In post 792, Gjt wrote:

In post 776, Nicholai wrote:VOTE: Gjt for now

his reaction to looker questioning his real life commitments: i think he'd be a little more outraged as town. his scumhunting on omnom recently and his retort to kanna reads as fake to me

Why would I be outraged? That is some weird logic. I don't really care if I'm beleived in regards to real life or not, not like I know anyone or can prove it.

I'm just here to play the game, gave a brief explanation for my absence also mentioned it couple days earlier as a courtesy heads up. I'm more concerned about being beleived to be Town aligned and not get into petty arguments or real life defenses with people I don't know online .

i think Looker was reaction testing when she said she didn't believe you. i thought you'd be a little more annoyed at someone questioning how busy you are in real life, considering the reasons you just gave where no one can know or prove it

Hm.

UNVOTE:
This discussion is nice.

alright i'm done here, that's more than enough effort for one day.

omnom rex gjt invis are potential scum for me right now

let me know who you're townreading omnom, and please elaborate your scumread on me if it still there outside of the salsa vote

@gjt: what's your opinion of rex so far this game?

In post 796, Nicholai wrote:alright i'm done here, that's more than enough effort for one day.

omnom rex gjt invis are potential scum for me right now

let me know who you're townreading omnom, and please elaborate your scumread on me if it still there outside of the salsa vote

@gjt: what's your opinion of rex so far this game?

I think what you posted reads more town. Wimpy's slot is town imo so Ank must be town. I read FL as town. I don't recognize Bob's posts as belonging to his scumgame, he's much more assertive here, so slight town lean.

I'm not sold on your Gjt scumlean.

I think joges or invis is where it's at, despite invis being lolrandom because if there's any day to deal with this, it's day 1 imo.

-

-