Mafiascum.net

In post 772, Lie Ren wrote:

In post 43, Trojan Horses wrote:VOTE: Trojan Horses

-Stuxnet

Please don’t. If anyone wasn’t aware this is a secret alt, and I intend to use it to take games at least mildly seriously, as well as post in a way I don’t do on my main.

In post 776, RadiantCowbells wrote:Let's policy lynch NSG because she kept tunneling me when she was a newbie

In post 771, RadiantCowbells wrote:CUZ MAYBE YOUR GONNA BE THE ONE THAT SAVES ME

In post 780, Baezu wrote:

In post 771, RadiantCowbells wrote:CUZ MAYBE YOUR GONNA BE THE ONE THAT SAVES ME

Not helpingggg

In post 74, We are not helping wrote:page 2 read lists are scummy

gobble probably leaning town cause 73

-bitmap

In post 160, RadiantCowbells wrote:if you say one more word about the playerlist I am going to scumread you for it

this seems like a really good way to create personality conflicts and given your team in TM had no qualms about abetting personality conflicts to win the normal I'm not putting it even slightly past you to be doing this deliberately to destroy town unity because that is objectively what shitting on half of the players in a game accomplishes

In post 161, RadiantCowbells wrote:this isn't a policy scumread either. i've been sitting here for a while thinking about how pro-scum a lot of this is. calling RC and NSG both scums to prevent us potentially mutually townreading each other and making us both impossible mislynches? manufacturing drama by calling a bunch of players shitty people to play with?

this isn't okay. and i have never known you as a player who deliberately stirs toxicity and that is exactly what you are doing right now.

In post 172, mastina wrote:

In post 170, Trojan Horses wrote:This game feels too easy, actually

It does, actually. Kinda boring, to be honest--I'm trying to find ways to generate fun since I legit feel the game's been close to solved in less than eight pages.

It's obviously not fully fully solved, but like. I feel like we're just waiting for people to show up and all agree on what's already obvious right now, and then to refine, hone in, on perfection so to speak, closer to the time when we need to, so like.

Just chilling right now.

I feel like this belief is foolhardy. We’ve barely started the game, despite having thirty pages.

In post 177, mastina wrote:

In post 175, RadiantCowbells wrote:I think that if you're claiming that you have reads this certain 7 pages in there's something really wrong with your thinking process.

There's a difference between having reads this certain in 7 pages in any given game, in general, generically...

...And having reads this certain in 7 pages in

this specific

game.

In this specific game, fuck yes, I feel that there's very damn good reads to be had off of 7 pages, reads that for D1 are exceptionally good--not perfect reads, of course, because it's D1, but right now I feel like we have better reads available from 7 pages, than most games have by the last day of D1 when there's less than 24 hours until deadline.

And frankly if you don't think these 7 pages contain enough information to get us a very damn good head start on solving the game, then there's something really wrong with

your

thinking process.

Do I think I have perfect reads or that perfect reads are possible right now?

Of course not!

Do I think we have enough information to,

for D1

, have a DAMN good starter solve?
Yes, yes I do.

In post 220, Trojan Horses wrote:"Scum are likelier to not understand jokes/irony from town"
What do you guys make of this statement?

In post 232, Trojan Horses wrote:Thank you. I went back to her readslist to check for slots which were outside null and didn't post by that point.

In post 48, mastina wrote:

We are not helping

jjh

DrDolittle

SirCakez

Elmo teh AzN

gobbledygook
Baezu
Amrun
northsidegal
Shuichi Saihara

Jormungand
Lie Ren
BBMolla
Wonderwall

Bernadetta

Trojan Horses

RadiantCowbells

Locktown, strong town, weak town, null, scum.

So the non-posters were divided into "weak town" and "null", interesting.
Mastina, on what basis did you bucket non-posters to weak town?

In post 245, BBmolla wrote:Are we really analyzing Mastinas jokepost or am I falling for an elaborate ruse

In post 783, RadiantCowbells wrote:Here's a spicy take

NSG is just scum and everyone should know that by now

But it feels like cheating for that to be half of our win condition so let's leave her alive

In post 302, jjh927 wrote:Here's the abridged version of jingle posts
Game A and Game B have the same number of players.
Game A and Game B each have 2 SCUM REMAINING!
Days will last indefinitely bla bla bla
Some stuff about night actions and how they resolve indicating this probably ain't mountainous
The MAFIA faction will win if at any time they control 50% of the votes in either game.

In post 310, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 309, Amrun wrote:

In post 308, We are not helping wrote:I think we need to stagger night phases personally. I don't think both games should go to night phase the same time.

-bitmap

If my game is in night but the other one isn’t, can I still post?

Yeah it’s wild amrun