Newbie 2007: Air [game over!]

[QuantumQuasar]

I was talking to the few afk players

[LuckyLuciano]

Oh. Is there a particular piece of literature you use as inspiration for your style of communication? Something I could study to better understand you when I play with you?

[QuantumQuasar]

It's either the time-frame is so rigid like after 24 hours you get a prod and players running to mods for a prod and time check to check their entitlement and privilege when after spewing posts of sololiquys to live as if an argument would give them a reason to be alive and feel something the silence radio turns out to be deafening

With two failed lynches at L-1 and this one at L-3, town might have clues to spot one but passive? You can't behave like that. You know this saying of a suspect put in custody and locked up for the night in jail, if the suspect sleeps well then he's more likely to be guilty (from exhaustion and relief of finally being caught) and if the suspect stays up all night worried and protests his innocence, the suspect is more likely to be innocent and defendable.

Are players caught between a durrr sublimed with an overload of information or frozen into behaving like someone else so I might be like them regardless of their alignment.

I think the game is still active, it's just the non-stop posting of Quick and Poyzin (who realized that he had to stop arguing).

But waiting on GB for some read-list? Preaching to the choir, your words are less important than you at the source is my take on GB delaying some defense and non-voters or stubborn parallel voters just cause I didn't realize we're this many and I'm fixated on my tunnel vision

[LuckyLuciano]

Is there a particular piece of literature you use as inspiration for your style of communication? Something I could study to better understand you when I play with you?

[QuantumQuasar]

Oh. Is there a particular piece of literature you use as inspiration for your style of communication? Something I could study to better understand you when I play with you?

Uh it depends because according to Jungian archetypes applied to methods I wouldn't get too smart as goes that saying

Don't take it personally would be good? As in stay professionally within your bounds from Day 1 until the game is over or wat because the meter is running mind you

[QuantumQuasar]

Yo Mara where you at

LuckyLuciano, take a load off this guy he has no clue where he's posting on a board like any other this isn't even comedy

Not directed at me, but I think the ISO case on Jumble is pretty solid. One thing I'd like to point out, his read list is in the order of the player list from post 0, so I do think it's possible that it was a copy paste error. I'm ok with applying pressure here. VOTE: Jumble

THIS IS L-1

PEdit -

This post is why teacher and jumble could be not guilty because teacher would never refer as "both" and "us"

Why wouldn't scum!teach use "both" here?

As for my question, I think it stands - from where I'm seeing it, he's saying both he and jumble have more posts than you as of that time. That's NAI because it's something that can be easily checked. I just did - as of post 214, teacher had roughly double the number of your posts and Jumble had exactly one more post than you did.

PEdit - I agree that he shouldn't be hammered yet. If anyone is considering it, please declare intent and wait for his defense.

If the question is about who is talking more be my guest, you can't expect a lesson explaining everything each time.

One can't appeal constantly to a popularity contest for plebiscite

You're the one who brought up the point on semantics by positing that, by teacher using the words "both" and "us", he and jumble cannot be scum. (Incidentally, the pronoun used in the post you quoted was "We" and not "us") I am requesting clarification on how the use of pronoun is alignment indicative.

I'm also confused about how a popularity contest for an advisory referendum is relevant.

[QuantumQuasar]

*Are players caught between a durrr sublimed with an overload of information or frozen into behaving like someone else so I might be like them regardless of their alignment.

Are players caught between a durrr sublimed with an overload of information or frozen into behaving like someone else to behave and say "I might be like them regardless of their alignment."

herd mentality

What I meant to say here is that some players are so far up in their theories and intrigues that they don't understand the basics of pragmatism in accepting to make mistakes and learning from them, the plea for validation, the plea for acknowledgment to be correct and triumphantly idolized

[LuckyLuciano]

I'll have to reread those posts for context. Although, I think it's worthwhile that you bring up Jumble having been at L-1. It happened before I replaced in and fell apart around the time I did. I need to go back and look at that wagon again. I think my predecessor was on him, it'll probably be revealing if my SoP unvote was the first unvote at L-1.

[Marashu]

Hey marashu we're talking about you here who are you hiding from

You ask at 3:45AM...

So, does 402 reflect your actual thoughts, or is it bait that you don't actually agree with?

It's what I thought, but I also wanted to see how he would react if I addressed that point directly.

PEdit - Where I'm at is currently getting ready for work.

[QuantumQuasar]

Like is that game related with the tennis courts discussed earlier

[LuckyLuciano]

Marashu, I don't like saying that activity is AI, partly because I understand how real life can get in the way of mafia, and partly because I don't have town meta from you to judge what your town activity looks like. However, you have consistently, as scum, disappeared until you have to get ready for work, promised content after work, and then disappeared again until you had to get ready for work again. Can I expect real content from you this evening?

[QuantumQuasar]

Poyzin was let down a few pages back so that doesn't count much.

This isn't your vlog livejournal

[QuantumQuasar]

Some townie players actually don't care: play to win

Poyzin might be close to voting but Marashu you already voted Quick before and you're voting him again, it's possible that the 3 votes (including mine) sway to Quick and before calling to arms as I say that check the nonsense of 3 players (quick, poyzin, teacher) not voting

Teacher besides whatever you posted and did can you vote ? Did you have enough time or are you just running on a tread milll expecting the scenery outside the window of the train to move

[QuantumQuasar]

Another format would be:

3 votes guilty
2 votes guilty

the accused goes up the stand

defends himself

another vote from three options: innocent, guilty, no vote

highest vote count determines the fate of the accused

when innocent, another vote round

that goes on maximum two times until night falls

in the event guilty, execution by town lynch then night falls

[QuantumQuasar]

Some people don't have all the time in the world imagine playing this on your deathbed from terminal illness

[Marashu]

After waking up a bit, I realize that QQ was asking where my HEAD was at, not where I was at physically.

Marashu, I don't like saying that activity is AI, partly because I understand how real life can get in the way of mafia, and partly because I don't have town meta from you to judge what your town activity looks like. However, you have consistently, as scum, disappeared until you have to get ready for work, promised content after work, and then disappeared again until you had to get ready for work again. Can I expect real content from you this evening?

I can, real quick, say where my mind's at right now. Still have an SL on 72, but my SR on Quick is stronger. I thought Poyzin's case on Jumble was pretty convincing, and I can see Jumble as being more likely to be Quick's partner than 72. My vote on Jumble wasn't doing much as while looking for a replacement so I figured it would be better to push on my next strongest SR. With 4 days until deadline Quick should still be an option, but if we're taking that off the table I think I would prefer Jumble over GB.

I'm not sure what you expect of me by "real content", but if you have anything specific I can address it. Beyond that, I'll probably continue contributing to trying to solve the game tonight.

[LuckyLuciano]

Who do you have townreads on, and why?

[LuckyLuciano]

You seem to be leaning scum on 72, Quick, and Jumble. What has George done to earn a pass today? Why exactly is he more likely to be town than Jumble?

[QuantumQuasar]

You know what LuckyLuciano who called me an alt account call me a social justice warrior from a non-profit organization while you're at it with some brain in the vat experiments from the cave on top

Quick was so close to being hammered and whoever unvoted him is likely to be town right

Then who was close to being voted again - jumble? yeah well he was close to being voted off, both of them at L-1 and then that fell through because he had enough of quick

Now if GB is at three and Quick at 2 then the standstill might hold because someone is rubbing their hands in the background saying we've got all the time in the world paradoxically not realizing that secrets are taken to the grave

With an undecisive bunch and a standstill then let it be

Who knew opinions had so much worth

[QuantumQuasar]

LuckyLuciano you're asking too many questions that's messed up. On this forum it's like some tradition to grill people by asking them questions like an angelic child with a voice of reason

[LuckyLuciano]

Quick was never at L-1. Jumble was. Poyzin unvoted first. Then I unvoted upon replacing in as SOP. Marashu's unvote game after the wagon collapsed. George was the last one on the wagon. I already had town reads on Jumble and Poyzin. This only serves to reinforce my belief that at least one of {George, Marashu} has to be scum.

[QuantumQuasar]

Quick is at L-1

that makes this GB vote even more suspect in hindsight

I have formed opinions about people here. I just didn't feel like those opinions were strong enough to use my vote on. Now with that being said...

VOTE: Quick

I'm just not a huge fan of his constant sarcastic replies.

Why would you think that comes from scum?

VOTE: NotAJumbleOfNumbers

[LuckyLuciano]

If Jumble was mafia, then he pretty much played against his wincon in the way he interacted with the gamestate created by the Quick v Poyzin 1v1. If Jumble is town, and no mafia were on his wagon, he probably would had been lynched. This leads me to believe that there was between 1-2 mafia on his wagon. I think Poyzin's mistake that I replaced Jumble doesn't cohere with the idea of mafia planning in the PT. If Poyzin is mafia, then the mafia probably are not communicating their moves to each other because his partner would have corrected him. So we're back to 1-2 scum between {George, Marashu}.

pedit: I guess I need to fact check. Looking through Datisi's iso I never saw Quick at L-1 in the VCs. Let me take some time and look at the votes around the posts you just linked.

[QuantumQuasar]

Tell me why I'm talking to you when gibus didn't say much. Gibus voted me D1 so one could reasonably say that unless a clever move gibus/you did by voting me to arrive to this conclusion that we are not associated with each other
I find your demeanor different from your grandiloquent multitasking entry over a 24hours back

[QuantumQuasar]

Too many ifs, you can build the world with ifs. Do not speak what you do not know of. Simple.

Hypotheses only go so far in exact sciences with a proper metric