Mafiascum.net

ninja'd down to the second wow

In post 768, The Bulge wrote:

In post 739, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 737, Infinity 324 wrote:Killing taylor might just be the play

Tbh a taylor/bulge scumteam makes sense since the ascetic member will always perform the kill. That was kinda my solve anyway.

Yes, she is the only non-confirmable slot. We should hear what Bulge says but that’s a really good point. If Tayl0r is buddies with Bulge, then his clear is meaningless.

~M

what does my clear have to do with taylor? I could opt to not perform the kill regardless of my partner's abilities. also if taylor is scum how do we know she's telling the truth about her role?

We don’t but what we do know is that Alchemist tracked you and you didn’t kill Gamma.

In post 769, The Bulge wrote:

In post 743, Venus and Mars wrote:Sorry if it’s not you but your aesthetic role makes you the best fade.

is this something town ever says in mylo?

We’re town, so it obviously must be true. Nice shade though.

~M

In post 770, The Bulge wrote:

In post 751, Venus and Mars wrote:I also hard vetoed both yours and Creature wagons D1.

what does this mean?

What do you think it means? How much of D1 have you read?

~M

In post 771, The Bulge wrote:did I miss something? why are so many people removing creature from their PoEs with the same confidence as if he were mechanically cleared

A) strong meta read

B) Why does scum!Creature kill Gamma who was tr him?

C) Why are you and Tayl0r the only ones who are pushing him?

In post 776, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 768, The Bulge wrote:

In post 739, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 737, Infinity 324 wrote:Killing taylor might just be the play

Tbh a taylor/bulge scumteam makes sense since the ascetic member will always perform the kill. That was kinda my solve anyway.

Yes, she is the only non-confirmable slot. We should hear what Bulge says but that’s a really good point. If Tayl0r is buddies with Bulge, then his clear is meaningless.

~M

what does my clear have to do with taylor? I could opt to not perform the kill regardless of my partner's abilities. also if taylor is scum how do we know she's telling the truth about her role?

We don’t but what we do know is that Alchemist tracked you and you didn’t kill Gamma.

my point is why even bring that up except to push your taylor/bulge team theory? my clear is meaningless already.

In post 777, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 769, The Bulge wrote:

In post 743, Venus and Mars wrote:Sorry if it’s not you but your aesthetic role makes you the best fade.

is this something town ever says in mylo?

We’re town, so it obviously must be true. Nice shade though.

~M

I shade those i find shady. how does this post accomplish more than mine? I'm signalling to others that they should be reading more into your slot. you're just shading my shade, you feel?

In post 778, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 770, The Bulge wrote:

In post 751, Venus and Mars wrote:I also hard vetoed both yours and Creature wagons D1.

what does this mean?

What do you think it means? How much of D1 have you read?

~M

I'm asking how that makes you town.

In post 779, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 771, The Bulge wrote:did I miss something? why are so many people removing creature from their PoEs with the same confidence as if he were mechanically cleared

A) strong meta read

B) Why does scum!Creature kill Gamma who was tr him?

C) Why are you and Tayl0r the only ones who are pushing him?

where did I push creature?

In post 780, The Bulge wrote:

In post 776, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 768, The Bulge wrote:

In post 739, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 737, Infinity 324 wrote:Killing taylor might just be the play

Tbh a taylor/bulge scumteam makes sense since the ascetic member will always perform the kill. That was kinda my solve anyway.

Yes, she is the only non-confirmable slot. We should hear what Bulge says but that’s a really good point. If Tayl0r is buddies with Bulge, then his clear is meaningless.

~M

what does my clear have to do with taylor? I could opt to not perform the kill regardless of my partner's abilities. also if taylor is scum how do we know she's telling the truth about her role?

We don’t but what we do know is that Alchemist tracked you and you didn’t kill Gamma.

my point is why even bring that up except to push your taylor/bulge team theory? my clear is meaningless already.

I know it’s not us and I don’t believe it’s Creature and Alchemist is confirmed by his role. I’m not pushing anything but both of you keep bringing up Creature and no one else is.

~M

In post 781, The Bulge wrote:

In post 777, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 769, The Bulge wrote:

In post 743, Venus and Mars wrote:Sorry if it’s not you but your aesthetic role makes you the best fade.

is this something town ever says in mylo?

We’re town, so it obviously must be true. Nice shade though.

~M

I shade those i find shady. how does this post accomplish more than mine? I'm signalling to others that they should be reading more into your slot.

you're just shading my shade

, you feel?

I’m what? If you think I’m scum then tell me why, because fmpov, it just looks like straight up omgussing. But assuming Infinity is telling the truth about his role. he can confirm you.

And despite him reading us incorrectly, their mindmeld with me on Creature looks better to me than you and Tayl0r who are reading him differently.

~M

In post 782, The Bulge wrote:

In post 778, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 770, The Bulge wrote:

In post 751, Venus and Mars wrote:I also hard vetoed both yours and Creature wagons D1.

what does this mean?

What do you think it means? How much of D1 have you read?

~M

I'm asking how that makes you town.

So did you actually read it or not and why are you tunnelling me?

~M

In post 783, The Bulge wrote:

In post 779, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 771, The Bulge wrote:did I miss something? why are so many people removing creature from their PoEs with the same confidence as if he were mechanically cleared

A) strong meta read

B) Why does scum!Creature kill Gamma who was tr him?

C) Why are you and Tayl0r the only ones who are pushing him?

where did I push creature?

In post 771, The Bulge wrote:did I miss something? why are so many people removing creature from their PoEs with the same confidence as if he were mechanically cleared

seriously?

In post 781, The Bulge wrote:

In post 777, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 769, The Bulge wrote:

In post 743, Venus and Mars wrote:Sorry if it’s not you but your aesthetic role makes you the best fade.

is this something town ever says in mylo?

We’re town, so it obviously must be true. Nice shade though.

~M

I shade those i find shady. how does this post accomplish more than mine? I'm signalling to others that they should be reading more into your slot. you're just shading my shade, you feel?

I’m not tr this post.

In post 784, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 780, The Bulge wrote:

In post 776, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 768, The Bulge wrote:

In post 739, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 737, Infinity 324 wrote:Killing taylor might just be the play

Tbh a taylor/bulge scumteam makes sense since the ascetic member will always perform the kill. That was kinda my solve anyway.

Yes, she is the only non-confirmable slot. We should hear what Bulge says but that’s a really good point. If Tayl0r is buddies with Bulge, then his clear is meaningless.

~M

what does my clear have to do with taylor? I could opt to not perform the kill regardless of my partner's abilities. also if taylor is scum how do we know she's telling the truth about her role?

We don’t but what we do know is that Alchemist tracked you and you didn’t kill Gamma.

my point is why even bring that up except to push your taylor/bulge team theory? my clear is meaningless already.

I know it’s not us and I don’t believe it’s Creature and Alchemist is confirmed by his role. I’m not pushing anything but both of you keep bringing up Creature and no one else is.

~M

??? i mentioned creature once today, asking people to explain their hard TRs

how is that a push? i have no read on creature, and it seems to me that the only reads people have are unexplained meta reads so it would be cool to be clued in.

In post 790, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 781, The Bulge wrote:

In post 777, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 769, The Bulge wrote:

In post 743, Venus and Mars wrote:Sorry if it’s not you but your aesthetic role makes you the best fade.

is this something town ever says in mylo?

We’re town, so it obviously must be true. Nice shade though.

~M

I shade those i find shady. how does this post accomplish more than mine? I'm signalling to others that they should be reading more into your slot. you're just shading my shade, you feel?

I’m not tr this post.

In post 789, The Bulge wrote:seriously?

There is a pretty obvious difference between how you and Infinity are approaching our slot. Your read on us just seems empty, like you just keep asking like what makes us town as opposed to actually explaining anything. I don’t get the impression you’re actually trying to read us.

~M

In post 779, Venus and Mars wrote:

In post 771, The Bulge wrote:did I miss something? why are so many people removing creature from their PoEs with the same confidence as if he were mechanically cleared

A) strong meta read

B) Why does scum!Creature kill Gamma who was tr him?

C) Why are you and Tayl0r the only ones who are pushing him?

My answer to your question.

fair, I haven't reread anything so my read is entirely based on your d2 play. rn im mainly just frustrated at the misreps. i super dont have the energy for explaining myself over and over again today so im gonna hit pause

ebwop fair re:empty read on your slot

In post 796, The Bulge wrote:fair, I haven't reread anything so my read is entirely based on your d2 play. rn im mainly just frustrated at the misreps. i super dont have the energy for explaining myself over and over again today so im gonna hit pause

In post 797, The Bulge wrote:ebwop fair re:empty read on your slot

So what are your reads on the rest of the playerlist?

I mean besides us, Creature?

~M

In post 740, Alchemist21 wrote:The only 2 caveats are the existence of a scum ninja

Quite hard if there's already a scum ascetic