Mafiascum.net

In post 755, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 753, superbowl9 wrote:Why the unvote titus?

i'll go out on a limb and say it's Titus trying to be unconventional and deciding that as soon as a good reason to vote you comes up, that's the time to unvote.

I don't like your opportunistic posting. At first you're for hessian. Then it's NPOM. Then it's superbowl9 at the same time. The wagons being S v S makes no sense. You make zero attempt to resolve this conflict at all. Then when I call you out on it, you go back to Hessian.

It doesn't read like you're solving but flailing instead, particularly with your discredit of me before finding out why I scumread you now.

While claiming we need more data to get an elimination off, you're not actually doing anything to get it. You're not showing a consistent thought process or any attempt to resolve the conflicts you report to have. Instead, its on to the next target.

In post 771, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 763, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 760, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 758, Battle Mage wrote:plus my neighbour thinks you're town based on some meta or something.

I will second this you just kind of have to get used to the playstyle

ok can we just do Hessian then?

I'm being stubborn and not moving off my policy unless i reeeeeaally need to. I think I will only do me or quickhammer person today (I can never remember the name) which is why I think you and the other black and white avi should just stay on me, titus will hammer eventually

dude are you actually scum trying to do me a favour here?

VOTE: superbowl9
I’m not thrilled about letting inactives ride along, but if it takes a day end keep active players from getting bored, let’s do it and fix the other slots later. That’s E-2 or E-1 or whatever. I have no idea.

SB9|BM|Wivyern is my solve right now.

alright let's just do it

VOTE: superbowl9

-1 again

In post 778, NoPowerOverMe wrote:SB9|BM|Wivyern is my solve right now.

pfft, if i was scum with SB here, we'd have probably already won.

In post 775, Titus wrote:

In post 755, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 753, superbowl9 wrote:Why the unvote titus?

i'll go out on a limb and say it's Titus trying to be unconventional and deciding that as soon as a good reason to vote you comes up, that's the time to unvote.

I don't like your opportunistic posting. At first you're for hessian. Then it's NPOM. Then it's superbowl9 at the same time. The wagons being S v S makes no sense. You make zero attempt to resolve this conflict at all. Then when I call you out on it, you go back to Hessian.

It doesn't read like you're solving but flailing instead, particularly with your discredit of me before finding out why I scumread you now.

While claiming we need more data to get an elimination off, you're not actually doing anything to get it. You're not showing a consistent thought process or any attempt to resolve the conflicts you report to have. Instead, its on to the next target.

lol i'm just trying to do something. there are good reasons to elim lots of people, and im fairly ambivalent between them, but i do want more flips for info.

In post 776, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 771, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 763, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 760, superbowl9 wrote:

In post 758, Battle Mage wrote:plus my neighbour thinks you're town based on some meta or something.

I will second this you just kind of have to get used to the playstyle

ok can we just do Hessian then?

I'm being stubborn and not moving off my policy unless i reeeeeaally need to. I think I will only do me or quickhammer person today (I can never remember the name) which is why I think you and the other black and white avi should just stay on me, titus will hammer eventually

dude are you actually scum trying to do me a favour here?

LOL i’ve given the scumteam my head on a platter twice now so i think it’s the opposite

In post 778, NoPowerOverMe wrote:SB9|BM|Wivyern is my solve right now.

I actually can see this. BM being a superbowl9 partner makes sense with BM's recent posting being god awful and him not wanting sb until it took off.

BM ignored my case on superbowl9 because he hadn't caught up (when he had the whole nightphase to do so). Despite his alleged lack of catch up, he had the time to pick a fight with me.

His push on Hessian is bad.

He comes to superbowl9 only when its popular, having little substance to explain the shift.

I scumread BM more individually but I wouldn't rule out S v S.

Titus can you hammer please and just 1v1 BM tomorrow please

i wish i hadnt claimed vanilla, or this wouldve been a great game to eat an NK in

In post 784, superbowl9 wrote:Titus can you hammer please and just 1v1 BM tomorrow please

this sounds like the least fun scenario, can i pass?

In post 781, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 775, Titus wrote:

In post 755, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 753, superbowl9 wrote:Why the unvote titus?

i'll go out on a limb and say it's Titus trying to be unconventional and deciding that as soon as a good reason to vote you comes up, that's the time to unvote.

I don't like your opportunistic posting. At first you're for hessian. Then it's NPOM. Then it's superbowl9 at the same time. The wagons being S v S makes no sense. You make zero attempt to resolve this conflict at all. Then when I call you out on it, you go back to Hessian.

It doesn't read like you're solving but flailing instead, particularly with your discredit of me before finding out why I scumread you now.

While claiming we need more data to get an elimination off, you're not actually doing anything to get it. You're not showing a consistent thought process or any attempt to resolve the conflicts you report to have. Instead, its on to the next target.

lol i'm just trying to do something. there are good reasons to elim lots of people, and im fairly ambivalent between them, but i do want more flips for info.

Why does info only come from rushing the day? We can wait on a Non replacement (which I am sure will happen).

You can't simultaneously bitch about the lack of discussion/info and do everything you can to cut it off.

In post 785, Battle Mage wrote:i wish i hadnt claimed vanilla, or this wouldve been a great game to eat an NK in

Changed my mind I'm actually a 10-shot JOAT

In post 784, superbowl9 wrote:Titus can you hammer please and just 1v1 BM tomorrow please

No. I'm not hammering anyone until we get replacements in.

This will give them and Hessian no excuse not to be caught up and give content.

In post 789, Titus wrote:

In post 784, superbowl9 wrote:Titus can you hammer please and just 1v1 BM tomorrow please

No. I'm not hammering anyone until we get replacements in.

This will give them and Hessian no excuse not to be caught up and give content.

Fair enough

I feel like BM is bussing SB9 here

In post 783, Titus wrote:

In post 778, NoPowerOverMe wrote:SB9|BM|Wivyern is my solve right now.

I actually can see this. BM being a superbowl9 partner makes sense with BM's recent posting being god awful and him not wanting sb until it took off.

i'm completely obvtown here

In post 783, Titus wrote: BM ignored my case on superbowl9 because he hadn't caught up (when he had the whole nightphase to do so). Despite his alleged lack of catch up, he had the time to pick a fight with me.

This is not true - i responded to your case on superbowl, and said it was really bad.

In post 783, Titus wrote: His push on Hessian is bad.

My argument is good - you just don't want to elim Hessian, despite being quite content to look at other low posters. You haven't explained why.

In post 783, Titus wrote: He comes to superbowl9 only when its popular, having little substance to explain the shift.

I voted superbowl cause of his claim and the fact we could actually flip him. not sure if that's the same thing

I'm townreading BM because he's mirroring my thoughts in a way that seems natural.

I expressed the same sentiment about day end as town in Mini Theme 2172 and got pilloried for it. https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12222345 Might be interesting to go back now and look at who was scum on my wagon in that game.

In post 789, Titus wrote:

In post 784, superbowl9 wrote:Titus can you hammer please and just 1v1 BM tomorrow please

No. I'm not hammering anyone until we get replacements in.

This will give them and Hessian no excuse not to be caught up and give content.

Hessian did give some content. didn't you read it?

In post 791, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I feel like BM is bussing SB9 here

Like I said, it's quite possible. Superbowl9 has just been rolling over apathetic today, not telling us who is scum (a policy lynch doesn't count). Given the evidence, I'm ok with nuking Superbowl9. I just feel BM is a better chance of netting scum.

Regardless, we need subs in here.

In post 791, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I feel like BM is bussing SB9 here

i am not

In post 795, Titus wrote:

In post 791, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I feel like BM is bussing SB9 here

Like I said, it's quite possible. Superbowl9 has just been rolling over apathetic today, not telling us who is scum (a policy lynch doesn't count). Given the evidence, I'm ok with nuking Superbowl9. I just feel BM is a better chance of netting scum.

Regardless, we need subs in here.

I think you're just being opportunistic, and picking on me because i'm not trying which makes me an easy target

maybe it is just Titus and the lurkers. consistent with her constant appeals for replacements haha