Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:12 pm
No it's not. Explain why it's scummy, go.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
the read was as i said: i think he saw the conflict between mathblade and dkkoba and rather than try to defuse it he tried to at first be passive and then instigate itIn post 762, Pink Ball wrote:'Cause you're voting DV and he was your partner in the previous game. I'm interested in that readIn post 756, petapan wrote:didn't see that, sorry. yeah, i did, was mostly a lot of stalling and nothing and jingle made a really great infographic. why do you ask?In post 753, Pink Ball wrote:One more thing: you missed my question, did you follow the previous game after your elimination?
we already have pooky we can't have 2 people in this game with peta paranoiaIn post 774, SirCakez wrote:i mean general paranoia
Then why is it defused now?In post 779, SirCakez wrote:i do have to say that defusing mb vs koba would have been literally impossible
I called out Galron because of his activity and he retaliated trying to make me look bad for it; I'm not even voting Galron, I'm asking him to git gudIn post 776, SirCakez wrote:you're trying to dunk on Galron for something that's NAI
looks like scum who wants LHF elim
It ran its course naturallyIn post 780, MathBlade wrote:Then why is it defused now?In post 779, SirCakez wrote:i do have to say that defusing mb vs koba would have been literally impossible
You said what he did was scummy thoughIn post 781, Pink Ball wrote:I called out Galron because of his activity and he retaliated trying to make me look bad for it; I'm not even voting Galron, I'm asking him to git gudIn post 776, SirCakez wrote:you're trying to dunk on Galron for something that's NAI
looks like scum who wants LHF elim
Yes, your read is based on this game solely; my question is if you think that could be premeditated by scum!DV based on the previous game, like a kind of play that would be in his scum rangeIn post 777, petapan wrote:the read was as i said: i think he saw the conflict between mathblade and dkkoba and rather than try to defuse it he tried to at first be passive and then instigate itIn post 762, Pink Ball wrote:'Cause you're voting DV and he was your partner in the previous game. I'm interested in that readIn post 756, petapan wrote:didn't see that, sorry. yeah, i did, was mostly a lot of stalling and nothing and jingle made a really great infographic. why do you ask?In post 753, Pink Ball wrote:One more thing: you missed my question, did you follow the previous game after your elimination?
It IS scummyIn post 782, SirCakez wrote:It ran its course naturallyYou said what he did was scummy thoughIn post 781, Pink Ball wrote:I called out Galron because of his activity and he retaliated trying to make me look bad for it; I'm not even voting Galron, I'm asking him to git gudIn post 776, SirCakez wrote:you're trying to dunk on Galron for something that's NAI
looks like scum who wants LHF elim
i don't really know enough about his scum range, we barely talked in the PT lol. he crushed my spirit once as scum a long time ago but i don't really remember how he played. i just think the approach he took there was scummyIn post 784, Pink Ball wrote:Yes, your read is based on this game solely; my question is if you think that could be premeditated by scum!DV based on the previous game, like a kind of play that would be in his scum range
Change the word scummy for "pro scum". Do you get my approach now?In post 786, SirCakez wrote:No it's not he's literally just inactive
That makes a lot more sense why did you word it differentlyIn post 788, Pink Ball wrote:Change the word scummy for "pro scum". Do you get my approach now?In post 786, SirCakez wrote:No it's not he's literally just inactive
I usually use them as synonyms but I get what the difference is in this contextIn post 790, SirCakez wrote:That makes a lot more sense why did you word it differentlyIn post 788, Pink Ball wrote:Change the word scummy for "pro scum". Do you get my approach now?In post 786, SirCakez wrote:No it's not he's literally just inactive
What’s your read on the ball of pink?In post 789, DeasVail wrote:MathBlade was a strong townread for me so Koba’s fixation on him was weird imo
Initial impression is possible scum but I will be reading over things again when I finish work.In post 792, MathBlade wrote:What’s your read on the ball of pink?In post 789, DeasVail wrote:MathBlade was a strong townread for me so Koba’s fixation on him was weird imo
so noncommittal againIn post 793, DeasVail wrote:Initial impression is possible scum but I will be reading over things again when I finish work.In post 792, MathBlade wrote:What’s your read on the ball of pink?In post 789, DeasVail wrote:MathBlade was a strong townread for me so Koba’s fixation on him was weird imo
How?In post 796, Pink Ball wrote:That means I'm on the right track with my reads