Page 32 of 76

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:12 pm
by Pink Ball
No it's not. Explain why it's scummy, go.

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:13 pm
by SirCakez
you're trying to dunk on Galron for something that's NAI
looks like scum who wants LHF elim

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:13 pm
by petapan
In post 762, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 756, petapan wrote:
In post 753, Pink Ball wrote:One more thing: you missed my question, did you follow the previous game after your elimination?
didn't see that, sorry. yeah, i did, was mostly a lot of stalling and nothing and jingle made a really great infographic. why do you ask?
'Cause you're voting DV and he was your partner in the previous game. I'm interested in that read
the read was as i said: i think he saw the conflict between mathblade and dkkoba and rather than try to defuse it he tried to at first be passive and then instigate it

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:13 pm
by petapan
In post 774, SirCakez wrote:
In post 771, petapan wrote:
In post 761, SirCakez wrote:peta can be in there too
not falling for his shtick again
??? lol dude i am nothing like the first game
i mean general paranoia
we already have pooky we can't have 2 people in this game with peta paranoia

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:14 pm
by SirCakez
i do have to say that defusing mb vs koba would have been literally impossible

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:15 pm
by MathBlade
In post 779, SirCakez wrote:i do have to say that defusing mb vs koba would have been literally impossible
Then why is it defused now?

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:15 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 776, SirCakez wrote:you're trying to dunk on Galron for something that's NAI
looks like scum who wants LHF elim
I called out Galron because of his activity and he retaliated trying to make me look bad for it; I'm not even voting Galron, I'm asking him to git gud

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:16 pm
by SirCakez
In post 780, MathBlade wrote:
In post 779, SirCakez wrote:i do have to say that defusing mb vs koba would have been literally impossible
Then why is it defused now?
It ran its course naturally
In post 781, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 776, SirCakez wrote:you're trying to dunk on Galron for something that's NAI
looks like scum who wants LHF elim
I called out Galron because of his activity and he retaliated trying to make me look bad for it; I'm not even voting Galron, I'm asking him to git gud
You said what he did was scummy though

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:16 pm
by MathBlade
I can see a DV+PB if I am wrong on Cakez

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:19 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 777, petapan wrote:
In post 762, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 756, petapan wrote:
In post 753, Pink Ball wrote:One more thing: you missed my question, did you follow the previous game after your elimination?
didn't see that, sorry. yeah, i did, was mostly a lot of stalling and nothing and jingle made a really great infographic. why do you ask?
'Cause you're voting DV and he was your partner in the previous game. I'm interested in that read
the read was as i said: i think he saw the conflict between mathblade and dkkoba and rather than try to defuse it he tried to at first be passive and then instigate it
Yes, your read is based on this game solely; my question is if you think that could be premeditated by scum!DV based on the previous game, like a kind of play that would be in his scum range

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:20 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 782, SirCakez wrote:It ran its course naturally
In post 781, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 776, SirCakez wrote:you're trying to dunk on Galron for something that's NAI
looks like scum who wants LHF elim
I called out Galron because of his activity and he retaliated trying to make me look bad for it; I'm not even voting Galron, I'm asking him to git gud
You said what he did was scummy though
It IS scummy

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:25 pm
by SirCakez
No it's not he's literally just inactive

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:27 pm
by petapan
In post 784, Pink Ball wrote:Yes, your read is based on this game solely; my question is if you think that could be premeditated by scum!DV based on the previous game, like a kind of play that would be in his scum range
i don't really know enough about his scum range, we barely talked in the PT lol. he crushed my spirit once as scum a long time ago but i don't really remember how he played. i just think the approach he took there was scummy

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:31 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 786, SirCakez wrote:No it's not he's literally just inactive
Change the word scummy for "pro scum". Do you get my approach now?

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:35 pm
by DeasVail
MathBlade was a strong townread for me so Koba’s fixation on him was weird imo

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:35 pm
by SirCakez
In post 788, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 786, SirCakez wrote:No it's not he's literally just inactive
Change the word scummy for "pro scum". Do you get my approach now?
That makes a lot more sense why did you word it differently

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:38 pm
by Pink Ball
In post 790, SirCakez wrote:
In post 788, Pink Ball wrote:
In post 786, SirCakez wrote:No it's not he's literally just inactive
Change the word scummy for "pro scum". Do you get my approach now?
That makes a lot more sense why did you word it differently
I usually use them as synonyms but I get what the difference is in this context

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 6:46 pm
by MathBlade
In post 789, DeasVail wrote:MathBlade was a strong townread for me so Koba’s fixation on him was weird imo
What’s your read on the ball of pink?

Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 8:09 pm
by DeasVail
In post 792, MathBlade wrote:
In post 789, DeasVail wrote:MathBlade was a strong townread for me so Koba’s fixation on him was weird imo
What’s your read on the ball of pink?
Initial impression is possible scum but I will be reading over things again when I finish work.

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 12:52 am
by DeasVail
Can confirm the above

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 2:44 am
by SirCakez
In post 793, DeasVail wrote:
In post 792, MathBlade wrote:
In post 789, DeasVail wrote:MathBlade was a strong townread for me so Koba’s fixation on him was weird imo
What’s your read on the ball of pink?
Initial impression is possible scum but I will be reading over things again when I finish work.
so noncommittal again
"could be scum" really?
any of us could be scum

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 3:01 am
by Pink Ball
Ah, the good ol' days of being scumread early D1. That's the Silver Bullet style, glad it hasn't changed. That means I'm on the right track with my reads

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 3:04 am
by SirCakez
In post 796, Pink Ball wrote:That means I'm on the right track with my reads
How?

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 3:21 am
by Pink Ball
I'm probably right about my townreads and I'm not pushing what seems to be the scum agenda

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 3:56 am
by SirCakez
Are you calling me scummy then?