Mafiascum.net

we should worry bout getting the RBsince RB > MD im assuming and given what Drap has done.. they would usually focus on not bussing their own RB but that can't always be reliable looking at townreads @bingle

In post 765, GrandpaMo wrote:wait why out a inno on the dead person . is it because of babysitter can protect u?

Hypoclaiming. Everyone claims a result, that way if the actual psychomologist has an innocent we don't lose it to them dying and they can remain unclaimed until just before XLO to hopefully narrow the lim pool. At this point they're functionally a visitor, but we know the role exists so they can selfconftown via claiming.

If roleblocked, the psychologist knows it due to a lack of results and so can avoid a fake innocent by claiming the invest on the dead player.

In post 774, GrandpaMo wrote:isn't the point of this, not to worry bout the result?

Bingle said all fake results should be innocent results, and that the psycologist should hard claim if they got a guilty result. So now I don't know if you are actually the psychologist hard claiming, or you misunderstood the directions.

wait was i not supposed to fake claim no result

that part wasnt clear to me at all

In post 776, Bingle wrote:Everyone claims an innocent result, that way if the actual psychomologist has an innocent we don't lose it to them dying and they can remain unclaimed until just before XLO to hopefully narrow the lim pool. At this point they're functionally a visitor, but we know the role exists so they can selfconftown via claiming.

FTFM, but we specifically want inno hypos. Actual guilties should just out, since a babysitter getting outed isn't the end of the world, particularly when we're up a lim.

In post 778, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:wait was i not supposed to fake claim no result

that part wasnt clear to me at all

It's suboptimal to fake a no result since scum would know if you did or didn't get roleblocked but wouldn't know if you did or didn't target Dann.

If you did get roleblocked, it tells them nothing, but it risks outing additional information to them for no reward.

Luke is innocent

I see

in that case I checked Dannflor and he is very innocent

In post 781, T3 wrote:Luke is innocent

Can confirm

I checked myself and it said innocent.

Oh, feel free to ask me questions about my proposed strategy from D1 today, as the psychologist is now a largely useless role and it being outed is not a big deal, tbh, as scum won't be too worried about killing there. (Far more important from their POV to hit the other PRs)

A large part of my Gypyx scumread early was what I saw as a manufactured slip. Luke doubling down on it was also :/

In post 785, Bingle wrote:Oh, feel free to ask me questions about my proposed strategy from D1 today, as the psychologist is now a largely useless role and it being outed is not a big deal, tbh, as scum won't be too worried about killing there. (Far more important from their POV to hit the other PRs)

A large part of my Gypyx scumread early was what I saw as a manufactured slip. Luke doubling down on it was also :/

I think it was just a misunderstanding from my part, but I am good now once I figured out what you were actually saying for us to do. So, just poor reading comprehension

In post 782, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:I see

in that case I checked Dannflor and he is very innocent

no u

In post 779, Bingle wrote:FTFM

smh make me the only fake guilty claim ok? thank u

well actually u might despise it since its guilty on you. dw tho i just pmed mod, and it was a mod error, they said guilty on t3 :3

In post 789, GrandpaMo wrote:well actually u might despise it since its guilty on you. dw tho i just pmed mod, and it was a mod error, they said guilty on t3 :3

So your solution was to make a new guilty claim. Nice.

In post 790, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 789, GrandpaMo wrote:well actually u might despise it since its guilty on you. dw tho i just pmed mod, and it was a mod error, they said guilty on t3 :3

So your solution was to make a new guilty claim. Nice.

shh

Hey, funky monkey. I don't have you as locktown yet. What gives?

so i had a quick reply written but got deleted.

as i said, in all seriousness, i see t3 + mena as the possible narrative for today.

if mena flips town, then pooky is most likely scum. and that sitatuion follows along with my first approach where pooky + a50 could be alligned if both were scumread. post 431 gives a lot of info imo

In post 719, GrandpaMo wrote:Can anyone tell me what Cowardly modifier does or is?

Can't makr the kill themselves unless they are the last scum alive. (Sorry if it has been answered, but I always answer as I read, and if I'm going to read this gigantic wall you can expect me responding with several posts that have already been said by someone else beyond this point)

^^Worst English I've spoken in a while, but I won't be arsed to rephrase it.

In post 719, GrandpaMo wrote:First approach analysis

Response: I usually brush off such cases and don't even care to respond (please write that down in case we meet in a future game and I do just that). But -since you appear to be either really tryharding or a noob- I want to say this: "I won't even go check the posts you refer to that probably link me to Drap. I'll just quote the one I remember saying:

In post 456, Almost50 wrote:IMHO, Drapion is more likely scum than T3 and/or Luke.

Question: Why would I pick my partner to shade over 1 or 2 townies? (They can't BOTH be Scum because that would be the whole Scum team and would make me 100% Town to begin with).

In post 719, GrandpaMo wrote:Everything else

I am confused when you say Mann.. do you mean Dann or do you mean ManWithNoName? My confusion stems from the fact it appears you prepared all this BEFORE theD2 started, so Dann wasn't flipped, and you also refer to N_M by his name, so I am leaning that you meant Dann, but still I see you typed Dann's name correctly at least 3 times within these spoilers 9and a 4th time at the bottom), so I can't be too sure which is it.

In post 722, GrandpaMo wrote:I FUCKING FORGOT MANN WAS REPLACED WITH N_M LOL.

OK.. I guess this answers my question

In post 724, T3 wrote:Dannflor kill? Thanks for killing a nullread
At this point I'm ready to assume everyone on Drap is not scum.
I haven't seen GM scumplay so idk.
VOTE: A50

Good vote.. (considering..)

In post 725, GrandpaMo wrote:A50 was on Drap

Correction: I actually wasn't. I wanted to, but I didn't actually vote because I didn't want the day to end just yet (and knew N_M would hammer as soon as he sees E-1).

Why I didn't want the day to end? I wanted to know WHO would put Drap to E-1.