Mafiascum.net

In post 774, Titus wrote:

In post 748, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 731, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 637, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: Titus
I townread your entire hero solve and the third one is me. Picking three names and none of them being scum is what I think happened here, and I think that is scum!indicative for Titus.

This answers one of my questions so fair enough. What makes the other two wrong in Titus' solve?

I explained this already

No you didn't. You gave vague responses and told us to go fish.

In post 773, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 766, Titus wrote:

In post 764, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 761, Titus wrote:Dwlee dropped his happy go lucky demeanor (words not quite right but there was a tonal shift towards aggression).

Nope

Yes. I just checked your ISO. There's no content (you admitted this) prior to my FoS on you. Your biggest non-RVS vote was on a lurker. Then, you're suddenly after me when I propose my hero solve in a long, delayed OMGUS.

That's not a tonal shift.

In post 761, Titus wrote:Dwlee dropped his happy go lucky demeanor (words not quite right but there was a tonal shift towards aggression).

In post 776, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't have super detailed wall reads

In post 778, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Alright, in response i'll UNVOTE: . Since you using that point against me was the biggest reason for my vote on you.

In post 761, Titus wrote:Dwlee dropped his happy go lucky demeanor (words not quite right but there was a tonal shift towards aggression).

I'll take a look at this first of all.

In post 782, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm scum hunting you Titus

In post 781, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I actually had this unmentioned theory that Dwlee could be intentionally playing up the difference to his scum meta to make sure we townread him here. But i would probably need to look at his actual towngames to verify if this is his actual style.

@Dwlee Can you link me to some of your towngames that you feel represent your towngame clearly and typically?

In post 730, RCEnigma wrote:I was on the fence about committing to defending Titus tbh but after jumping around a bit I'm on board with town in Titus, norwee.

Maybe gcb and maybe emperor.

Bingle is in a weird place I can't visit.

SS is my best fos and Mastina doesn't FEEL town halfway through the day but that's vague and floaty.

Also by virtue of weak engagement from dwlee on their wagon stance AND my opinion that the Titus wagon is built on quicksand dwlee can be on the bottom pile with SS for now.

In post 418, Fairy Circle wrote:

In post 388, Green Cap Boys wrote:

In post 386, Fairy Circle wrote:Could you elaborate on Bingle and Titus? I haven't really felt strongly either way on Bingle, but I do quite like Titus thus far.

-Malefleacent

...why do you like

Titus

?

I admit I have slight bias, it's part of why I wish to talk to Momcinda about reads.

In post 426, Fairy Circle wrote:

In post 390, NorwegianboyEE wrote:

In post 386, Fairy Circle wrote:Could you elaborate on Bingle and Titus? I haven't really felt strongly either way on Bingle, but I do quite like Titus thus far.

-Malefleacent

No i don’t want to elaborate on Bingle yet.
Titus, just really meh so far.
Also what do you make of them saying you need votes? They don’t seem to underline much of any of their votes so far with much reasoning.

That's standard Titus.

In post 392, Green Cap Boys wrote:So, anyway, my thoughts on the acceptable strategy for Pain potion usage is that we should have a vig pool of at most 2 names for people to shoot at.

This has the benefit of:

1. Concentrating town's firepower such that it's actually possible to flip a suspect. It doesn't matter if scum chooses to shoot there because it's on town, it's still a town-directed kill and is clearing out someone who otherwise would have been an elimination candidate.
2. It makes it scarier for scum to shoot in people outside the pool - in addition to the possibility of having a shot blocked by a doctor/jailkeeper potion, any result from a harmography potion is a hard guilty - they cannot get away with an excuse of "Oh I used my pain on [insert obvtown player here] because I scumread them"

If people want no vig shots at all, I think that's also an acceptable strategy, I just flat-out Do Not Want people shooting on a whim because that is likely to end badly and affords scum too much in the way of wiggle room

-R

Absolutely not.
We give scum free kills with a pool, and honestly trying to control town's shots is never going to end well.

In post 395, Bingle wrote:

In post 376, Fairy Circle wrote:Maths is not my strong suit. Neither is English apparently.

Mafia are aware of who to target, their pool is 8, I will not discuss scum tactics here.
Each one of us are only aware of ourselves. Our pool is 10.

2 people need to successfully target any one person to obtain a kill.

Town still has 1-in-10 (2:20) of hitting that kill in a single night. Over two nights it's a lot greater chance of hitting the kill and cannot be estimated without long calculations which frankly I do not have the time nor patience for.

I suspect there will be as much town invoked death as scum invoked. Greatest difficulty in this game is that NKA cannot feasibly happen.

-Malefleacent.

Not only is this math completely wrong, it’s also completely irrelevant.

We need to either mass holster like we should have done in Ygg or turn the pain potions mechanic into additional eliminations, like we did after morph was confirmed.

I said it wasn't my strong point, and this isn't Ygg. The only similarity is HP and chip potential. Everyones got 2HP and we don't get updates beyond that.
Dwlee has already said they're not following this tactic. (I see in my PEdit a possible agreement for pool shots)
No matter how perfect your strategy is, you will have the human element to battle against.

In post 398, Bingle wrote:

In post 392, Green Cap Boys wrote:2 names for people to shoot at.

These names should be leashed. First five can shoot at one, second five can shoot at the other. Additional benefit of mafia risking having to justify why they didn’t shoot.

And this is an absolutely waste of any power town has, and I know you're not stupid enough to suggest this legitmately.

In post 789, Dwlee99 wrote:Oh right flea had a meta town read on you. I don't think that's scum defending you. Rc didn't give reasons so idk. He has to think about what I said with your solve

In post 793, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't think the defense of you is scummy, why would it be? Cause it's undefined?

Pedit: I'm not active enough to do what you're saying I should be doing

In post 593, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I’d appreciate it if Datisi or Emperor could chime in what their opinion is, and i’ll take it into account.

In post 586, Fairy Circle wrote:Now as for this read that is being disagreed with, it is my understanding that Norwee is of the mind that we are to be eliminated, as the scummiest hydra.

In post 568, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Anyway i do not wish to fight you on this. I’ve stated my point and i believe it is logical and just. You may disagree but i’m not discussing it anymore.

In post 586, Fairy Circle wrote:Norwee has since disengaged under guise of believing that I think he is a hydra, which I clearly know he is not given we have played together before.