Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 3:53 am
Well, things changed quickly. Enchant ain't going today either
Who should go though?In post 775, geraintm wrote:Well, things changed quickly. Enchant ain't going today either
if only there was a wayof going through my posts to see who i am voting for...In post 776, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Who should go though?In post 775, geraintm wrote:Well, things changed quickly. Enchant ain't going today either
I don't think anyone should give any Townpoints to someone pointing at their own post and going "why does scum say this?" in the "this is too scummy for scum to say" sense. You obviously think it's Townie, why wouldn't Scum!you say it.
In post 61, AliceK wrote:I think MargotRosa entry is awkward, repeating my joke could be a scum not having an idea how to enter the thread. And Kyouko could notice that as well and stack a vote, distancing herself early.In post 56, Jolyne wrote:What is scummy about Kyouko?In post 53, AliceK wrote:MargotRosa and ssbm are the scumiest from entries.
I doubt Jackson will come to play.
Is the vote result of the meta? If so, sell me on it?In post 770, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:VOTE: Kazyan
Still gotta read the other players, got pulled into some meta here.
His entrance into the game seemed scummy from the get-go, but 257 held my scumread at bay. Rereading it though, I dont feel compelled by 257 the way I did the first time. It doesnt feel strong enough in the current gamestate where I'm developing more TRs or tableing players like geraintm/enchant for later.In post 780, Nathann wrote:Is the vote result of the meta? If so, sell me on it?In post 770, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:VOTE: Kazyan
Still gotta read the other players, got pulled into some meta here.
Actually sell me on it regardless, I'm not sure where to vote.
In post 738, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm not trying to figure out who is paired with who right now. I could make an associative based reads list but I don't think it'll be very helpful this early. I think if you're scum you're scum even if it isn't with someone else I think might be scum.
I expected a better reaction to this -- you haven't refuted anything in my scumcase.In post 739, Dwlee99 wrote:I also think your point on 575 completely misses the context that Koba is trying to call me a town leader which I don't think I ever really am this early in the game.
What do you think about dwlee as well. They have also been passive and if you look at their iso -- you would see the similar things that is happening in your own analysis of your scumread's iso.In post 782, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:His entrance into the game seemed scummy from the get-go, but 257 held my scumread at bay. Rereading it though, I dont feel compelled by 257 the way I did the first time. It doesnt feel strong enough in the current gamestate where I'm developing more TRs or tableing players like geraintm/enchant for later.In post 780, Nathann wrote:Is the vote result of the meta? If so, sell me on it?In post 770, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:VOTE: Kazyan
Still gotta read the other players, got pulled into some meta here.
Actually sell me on it regardless, I'm not sure where to vote.
Additionally, I skimmed his iso in his 2 newbie games, 1 he is town, the other he is scum, and I feel like he as a person associates "vote-parking" with a scummy behavior from reading his iso here and in the 2 newbies. He opens the game vote parking here, and I feel like the reason he associates it with scummy behavior is because it is what he is inclined to do as scum.
I also feel like he's been waiting a lot, very passive. Like he wants to see what others do before committing. Looking at 70 for example, is one example of this, but there are more instances to be found in his ISO
Didn't you call me scum? Shouldn't you be voting me now?In post 780, Nathann wrote:Is the vote result of the meta? If so, sell me on it?In post 770, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:VOTE: Kazyan
Still gotta read the other players, got pulled into some meta here.
Actually sell me on it regardless, I'm not sure where to vote.
Why Margo rather than ssbm?
In post 778, Nathann wrote:I don't think anyone should give any Townpoints to someone pointing at their own post and going "why does scum say this?" in the "this is too scummy for scum to say" sense. You obviously think it's Townie, why wouldn't Scum!you say it.
Regarding the rest of the post, I didn't say you had no reads or no analysis, but even what you quoted, most of it is pretty weak questioning. 727 is more what I think of when I say "analysis".
I don't love 727 because a lot of it feels like nitpicking the fact that Dwlee's two scumreads are scumreading each other. Or just in general things that he concludes can be NAI or "fair". It's better than his previous content sure, but meh.
re: Kazyan's grid - I Townread everyone who wasn't on the list of people I said I would vote.
basedIn post 757, Andresvmb wrote:You’re being obtuse and annoying. Even if I could figure out exactly what alignment you are I don’t think I would care.
because i read kyouko as town and i have a consistent record on them.
Like this as town.In post 59, Nixie wrote:yeah not happy with the IC diving line from geraintm. It gets us nowhere and is busywork for everyone.
Vote: geraintm
That question was for Dwlee as you hadn't weighed in at the time.In post 792, Jolyne wrote:because i read kyouko as town and i have a consistent record on them.
Okay very good question -- this literally falls on my line of reasoning with the pairing with ssbm / and dwlee.
It feels town but I don't really get jokes soooIn post 779, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:@Titus
What do you think of this post? Need to read RVS for contextIn post 61, AliceK wrote:I think MargotRosa entry is awkward, repeating my joke could be a scum not having an idea how to enter the thread. And Kyouko could notice that as well and stack a vote, distancing herself early.In post 56, Jolyne wrote:What is scummy about Kyouko?In post 53, AliceK wrote:MargotRosa and ssbm are the scumiest from entries.
I doubt Jackson will come to play.
I don't recommend you play IC like this. Wait for a wagon to form, then veto imo.In post 797, Jolyne wrote:i have already declared nathan andres and kyouko off the table for d1
Oh... that kyouko?In post 797, Jolyne wrote:i have already declared nathan andres and kyouko off the table for d1